本文選題：Q幣 + 虛擬財產(chǎn)��； 參考：《蘭州大學》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 進入新世紀以來,網(wǎng)絡犯罪案件層出不窮,尤其以網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪案件最為常見,預防和懲治網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪成為迫切的現(xiàn)實需求。然而,目前我國立法對網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪的規(guī)制缺乏足夠的法律依據(jù)。本文選取網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪案件中比較典型的廈門Q幣案為例,理論聯(lián)系實際,通過分析案件反映出的問題來論述當前我國法律在此方面存在的缺陷,并借鑒發(fā)達國家和地區(qū)先進的網(wǎng)絡立法經(jīng)驗,結合中國實際情況,提出一些法律建議,以促進中國網(wǎng)絡法制化進程。 本文寫作分為以下幾個部分: 首先,通過對廈門Q幣案案情和爭議焦點的介紹,引出虛擬財產(chǎn)法律地位及價值認定,侵犯虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪案件如何定罪,電子證據(jù)法律地位等問題,介紹法檢雙方以及社會各界在這些問題上的觀點與分歧。 其次,對廈門Q幣案進行全面的法律分析,對爭議的焦點問題進行辨析,提出虛擬財產(chǎn)應當屬于受刑法保護的財產(chǎn),虛擬財產(chǎn)權應當是一種兼具物權屬性和債權屬性的新型財產(chǎn)權的觀點,并對本案等侵犯網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪涉案數(shù)額的認定提出自己的看法;在綜合比較分析電子證據(jù)有關學說的基礎上,論述電子證據(jù)在本案等侵犯網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪案件中的法律地位,對本案的定罪量刑提出自己的看法。 最后,對案件進行反思,總結案件反應出的問題,提出一些立法建議。包括應當立法的幾個方面,應遵循什么樣的立法模式和基本要求,并提出在目前法律對相關問題還沒有明確規(guī)定的情況下,為維護罪刑法定和統(tǒng)一司法實踐的權宜之計。 侵犯網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)類犯罪案件本身爭議就很大,許多問題至今沒有定論,本文的撰寫意在引起社會全面、客觀的認識網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪的復雜性,溝通理論和實務,統(tǒng)一裁判標準,完善立法和提高司法功效,增強防控網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪的能力。
[Abstract]:Since entering the new century, the network crime cases emerge in endlessly, especially in the network virtual property crime cases are the most common, the prevention and punishment of the network virtual property crime has become an urgent practical need. However, the legislation of our country lacks sufficient legal basis to regulate the crime of network virtual property. This paper takes Xiamen Q coin case, which is a typical crime case of virtual property on the network, as an example, combines theory with practice, and discusses the defects of current Chinese law in this respect by analyzing the problems reflected in the case. Based on the advanced network legislation experience of developed countries and regions and the actual situation in China, some legal suggestions are put forward in order to promote the process of network legalization in China. This paper is divided into the following parts: First of all, through the introduction of the case of Q coin in Xiamen and the focus of the dispute, the legal status and value determination of virtual property, how to convict the crime case of infringing virtual property, the legal status of electronic evidence, etc. This paper introduces the views and differences on these issues between the two parties and the community. Secondly, it makes a comprehensive legal analysis of Q coin case in Xiamen, differentiates the focus of the dispute, and puts forward that the virtual property should belong to the property protected by criminal law. The virtual property right should be a new property right with the property of real right and the attribute of creditor's rights, and put forward its own opinion on the confirmation of the amount involved in the crime of infringing on the network virtual property, such as this case. On the basis of comprehensive comparison and analysis of relevant theories of electronic evidence, this paper discusses the legal status of electronic evidence in the case of network virtual property crime, and puts forward its own views on the conviction and sentencing of this case. Finally, reflect on the case, summarize the problems reflected in the case, and put forward some legislative suggestions. It includes several aspects of legislation, what kind of legislative model and basic requirements should be followed, and puts forward some expedient measures for maintaining the punishment of crime and unifying judicial practice under the circumstances that there are no clear provisions on the relevant issues in the present law. The crime case of infringing the network virtual property itself is very controversial, many problems have not yet been decided, the writing of this article is intended to cause the society to comprehensively and objectively understand the complexity of the crime of network virtual property, and communicate the theory and practice. Unify the judgment standard, perfect the legislation and improve the judicial effect, strengthen the ability of preventing and controlling the crime of the network virtual property.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D920.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 邱業(yè)偉;程鈺文;李麗;吳斌;李霽;;電子證據(jù)的法律地位新探——案件事實信息理論在電子證據(jù)中的作用[J];重慶郵電大學學報(社會科學版);2008年02期

2 楊鯉逢;劉蕾;胡靈飛;;論網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)的性質(zhì)與保護[J];法制與社會;2008年13期

3 侯國云;;論網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)刑事保護的不當性——讓虛擬財產(chǎn)永遠待在虛擬世界[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2008年03期

4 陳開琦;論計算機犯罪主體[J];貴州大學學報(社會科學版);1997年02期

5 馮亞東;;犯罪認知體系視野下之犯罪構成[J];法學研究;2008年01期

6 吳漢東;無形財產(chǎn)權的若干理論問題[J];法學研究;1997年04期

7 王利明;;再論物權的概念[J];社會科學研究;2006年05期

8 李少尉;;虛擬貨幣的三大風險[J];電子商務世界;2006年10期

9 皮勇;張晶;;論盜竊網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)行為的性質(zhì)——以網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)的法律屬性為視角[J];信息網(wǎng)絡安全;2006年10期

10 陳旭琴,戈壁泉;論網(wǎng)絡虛擬財產(chǎn)的法律屬性[J];浙江學刊;2004年05期

，

本文編號：1916265