本文選題：Q幣 + 虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 進(jìn)入新世紀(jì)以來(lái),網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪案件層出不窮,尤其以網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪案件最為常見(jiàn),預(yù)防和懲治網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪成為迫切的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求。然而,目前我國(guó)立法對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪的規(guī)制缺乏足夠的法律依據(jù)。本文選取網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪案件中比較典型的廈門(mén)Q幣案為例,理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際,通過(guò)分析案件反映出的問(wèn)題來(lái)論述當(dāng)前我國(guó)法律在此方面存在的缺陷,并借鑒發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和地區(qū)先進(jìn)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),結(jié)合中國(guó)實(shí)際情況,提出一些法律建議,以促進(jìn)中國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)法制化進(jìn)程。 本文寫(xiě)作分為以下幾個(gè)部分: 首先,通過(guò)對(duì)廈門(mén)Q幣案案情和爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)的介紹,引出虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)法律地位及價(jià)值認(rèn)定,侵犯虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪案件如何定罪,電子證據(jù)法律地位等問(wèn)題,介紹法檢雙方以及社會(huì)各界在這些問(wèn)題上的觀點(diǎn)與分歧。 其次,對(duì)廈門(mén)Q幣案進(jìn)行全面的法律分析,對(duì)爭(zhēng)議的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行辨析,提出虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)應(yīng)當(dāng)屬于受刑法保護(hù)的財(cái)產(chǎn),虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)應(yīng)當(dāng)是一種兼具物權(quán)屬性和債權(quán)屬性的新型財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的觀點(diǎn),并對(duì)本案等侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪涉案數(shù)額的認(rèn)定提出自己的看法;在綜合比較分析電子證據(jù)有關(guān)學(xué)說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上,論述電子證據(jù)在本案等侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪案件中的法律地位,對(duì)本案的定罪量刑提出自己的看法。 最后,對(duì)案件進(jìn)行反思,總結(jié)案件反應(yīng)出的問(wèn)題,提出一些立法建議。包括應(yīng)當(dāng)立法的幾個(gè)方面,應(yīng)遵循什么樣的立法模式和基本要求,并提出在目前法律對(duì)相關(guān)問(wèn)題還沒(méi)有明確規(guī)定的情況下,為維護(hù)罪刑法定和統(tǒng)一司法實(shí)踐的權(quán)宜之計(jì)。 侵犯網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)類(lèi)犯罪案件本身爭(zhēng)議就很大,許多問(wèn)題至今沒(méi)有定論,本文的撰寫(xiě)意在引起社會(huì)全面、客觀的認(rèn)識(shí)網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪的復(fù)雜性,溝通理論和實(shí)務(wù),統(tǒng)一裁判標(biāo)準(zhǔn),完善立法和提高司法功效,增強(qiáng)防控網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪的能力。
[Abstract]:Since entering the new century, the network crime cases emerge in endlessly, especially in the network virtual property crime cases are the most common, the prevention and punishment of the network virtual property crime has become an urgent practical need. However, the legislation of our country lacks sufficient legal basis to regulate the crime of network virtual property. This paper takes Xiamen Q coin case, which is a typical crime case of virtual property on the network, as an example, combines theory with practice, and discusses the defects of current Chinese law in this respect by analyzing the problems reflected in the case. Based on the advanced network legislation experience of developed countries and regions and the actual situation in China, some legal suggestions are put forward in order to promote the process of network legalization in China. This paper is divided into the following parts: First of all, through the introduction of the case of Q coin in Xiamen and the focus of the dispute, the legal status and value determination of virtual property, how to convict the crime case of infringing virtual property, the legal status of electronic evidence, etc. This paper introduces the views and differences on these issues between the two parties and the community. Secondly, it makes a comprehensive legal analysis of Q coin case in Xiamen, differentiates the focus of the dispute, and puts forward that the virtual property should belong to the property protected by criminal law. The virtual property right should be a new property right with the property of real right and the attribute of creditor's rights, and put forward its own opinion on the confirmation of the amount involved in the crime of infringing on the network virtual property, such as this case. On the basis of comprehensive comparison and analysis of relevant theories of electronic evidence, this paper discusses the legal status of electronic evidence in the case of network virtual property crime, and puts forward its own views on the conviction and sentencing of this case. Finally, reflect on the case, summarize the problems reflected in the case, and put forward some legislative suggestions. It includes several aspects of legislation, what kind of legislative model and basic requirements should be followed, and puts forward some expedient measures for maintaining the punishment of crime and unifying judicial practice under the circumstances that there are no clear provisions on the relevant issues in the present law. The crime case of infringing the network virtual property itself is very controversial, many problems have not yet been decided, the writing of this article is intended to cause the society to comprehensively and objectively understand the complexity of the crime of network virtual property, and communicate the theory and practice. Unify the judgment standard, perfect the legislation and improve the judicial effect, strengthen the ability of preventing and controlling the crime of the network virtual property.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D920.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邱業(yè)偉;程鈺文;李麗;吳斌;李霽;;電子證據(jù)的法律地位新探——案件事實(shí)信息理論在電子證據(jù)中的作用[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

2 楊鯉逢;劉蕾;胡靈飛;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的性質(zhì)與保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年13期

3 侯國(guó)云;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)刑事保護(hù)的不當(dāng)性——讓虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)永遠(yuǎn)待在虛擬世界[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

4 陳開(kāi)琦;論計(jì)算機(jī)犯罪主體[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1997年02期

5 馮亞?wèn)|;;犯罪認(rèn)知體系視野下之犯罪構(gòu)成[J];法學(xué)研究;2008年01期

6 吳漢東;無(wú)形財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的若干理論問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年04期

7 王利明;;再論物權(quán)的概念[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2006年05期

8 李少尉;;虛擬貨幣的三大風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];電子商務(wù)世界;2006年10期

9 皮勇;張晶;;論盜竊網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)行為的性質(zhì)——以網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的法律屬性為視角[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2006年10期

10 陳旭琴,戈壁泉;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的法律屬性[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2004年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1916265