發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-14 22:21

  本文選題：全某 + 行為　； 參考：《人民檢察》2012年17期

【摘要】：正《人民檢察》2012年第11期上發(fā)表了《利用職務(wù)之便插播廣告收取好處費(fèi)構(gòu)成何罪》一文,該文認(rèn)為,全某利用自己在A市廣播電視集團(tuán)負(fù)責(zé)串編廣告的職務(wù)之便,篡改廣告串編視頻,私自為飛揚(yáng)公司投放廣告,并按照事先約定好的結(jié)算方式收取飛揚(yáng)公司的錢款,是一種非常典型的權(quán)錢交易,應(yīng)認(rèn)定為受賄罪。筆者認(rèn)為,這一觀點(diǎn)是值得商榷的,全某的行為并非受賄,而是貪污,構(gòu)成貪污罪。
[Abstract]:The 11th issue of the people's Procuratorate, in 2012, published an article entitled "what is the Crime of using your Duty to insert advertisements in order to collect an advantage fee?" this article holds that a certain person has taken advantage of his position in the A City Radio and Television Group to take charge of serial advertising. It is a typical right and money transaction to tamper with the video of advertising string, place advertisements privately for Feiyang Company, and collect the money of Feiyang Company according to the agreed settlement method, which should be regarded as the crime of accepting bribes. The author believes that this view is open to question, the whole act is not bribery, but corruption, constitutes a crime of corruption.
【作者單位】： 廣東省東莞市人民檢察院;
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5;D924.3
，

本文編號(hào)：1889724