本文選題：特別權(quán)利關(guān)系　切入點：違憲審查　出處：《華中科技大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：特別權(quán)力關(guān)系，是國家和公民之間的一種特殊關(guān)系，其給予了行政主體相當大的自由裁量權(quán)，并且通過內(nèi)部規(guī)范來限制基本權(quán)利，在內(nèi)部尋求救濟。 我國尊重和保障人權(quán)，而這些特別權(quán)力關(guān)系中的人受到侵害的情形卻常常容易被人忽視。這與保障人權(quán)的相關(guān)配套機制不健全有著極大的關(guān)系。如今在我國，圍繞著違憲審查制度，這一人權(quán)救濟機制的設(shè)立及其模式還存在著種種爭論，，很多學者都對發(fā)達國家，比如說美國的司法審查模式、法國的憲政院模式等進行了詳細的探討，對于一衣帶水的日本，其違憲審查模式，特別是其中對特別權(quán)力關(guān)系中的人權(quán)保障問題更是很少有人提及。因此，本文通過對日本違憲審查的案例進行歸類分析，結(jié)合涉及公務(wù)員、被關(guān)押者、高校學生的相關(guān)案例，找出在保障這些特殊主體的基本人權(quán)的方法、理論等，并結(jié)合我國案例，試圖給我國提供一定的借鑒和參考。
[Abstract]:The special power relationship is a special relationship between the state and the citizen, which gives the administrative subject considerable discretion, and limits the basic right through the internal norm, and seeks the relief internally.Human rights are respected and protected in our country, and violations of these special power relationships are often overlooked.This has a great relationship with the imperfect supporting mechanism of protecting human rights.Nowadays, in our country, around the system of unconstitutional review, there are still various arguments about the establishment and mode of the human rights relief mechanism. Many scholars have expressed their views on the judicial review model of developed countries, such as the United States.The mode of constitutional court in France is discussed in detail. For Japan, whose unconstitutional review mode, especially the human rights protection in the special power relationship, is seldom mentioned.Therefore, by classifying and analyzing the cases of Japan's unconstitutional review, combining with the relevant cases involving civil servants, detainees and college students, this paper finds out the methods and theories to protect the basic human rights of these special subjects.And combine our country case, try to provide certain reference and reference to our country.
【學位授予單位】：華中科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D931.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 華夏;日本憲法訴訟的特點[J];比較法研究;1987年01期

2 莫紀宏;論人權(quán)的司法救濟[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2000年05期

3 吳小龍,王族臻;特別權(quán)力關(guān)系理論與我國的“引進”[J];法學;2005年04期

4 伍勁松;論特別權(quán)力關(guān)系[J];華南師范大學學報(社會科學版);2004年04期

本文編號：1717364