本文選題：立法語(yǔ)言　切入點(diǎn)：立法技術(shù)　出處：《大連理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：已頒布的地方性乃至國(guó)家更重要的部分法律法規(guī)中,在詞語(yǔ)運(yùn)用、語(yǔ)法規(guī)范、標(biāo)點(diǎn)符號(hào)、邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)等各方面顯現(xiàn)的問題并非少數(shù)。關(guān)于立法語(yǔ)言,以往的研究大都針對(duì)國(guó)家重點(diǎn)“大法”,角度與層面主要體現(xiàn)在立法語(yǔ)言的各層次結(jié)構(gòu)規(guī)律及特殊的立法句式和表述現(xiàn)象、法律文本的翻譯等方面,即便有涉及到立法技術(shù),但對(duì)立法語(yǔ)言失范問題研究也甚是稀少,尤其是地方性法律法規(guī)。 論文第二章以陸儉明先生、李振宇先生、潘慶云先生等語(yǔ)言學(xué)家對(duì)于立法語(yǔ)言的研究理論為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合法學(xué)意義對(duì)立法語(yǔ)言進(jìn)行描述。關(guān)于“立法語(yǔ)言”和“立法技術(shù)”的定義,采用潘慶云先生的觀點(diǎn)：把用于立法的語(yǔ)言稱為“立法語(yǔ)言”；把制定修改、廢止法律的專用技術(shù)敲定為“立法技術(shù)”�！傲⒎ㄕZ(yǔ)言”與“法律語(yǔ)言”的關(guān)系,按照劉紅嬰和湯嘯天的觀點(diǎn),把法律語(yǔ)言劃為立法語(yǔ)言和司法語(yǔ)言。由此可見,立法語(yǔ)言是法律語(yǔ)言的一個(gè)分支。 論文第三章立足于立法技術(shù),搜集整理相當(dāng)數(shù)量的大連市地方法律法規(guī),并對(duì)其做客觀的描寫；雖從具體的法律法規(guī)出發(fā),但不止于數(shù)據(jù)和案例的整理,而是以定性研究作為最終的目標(biāo)。在系統(tǒng)觀察和分析立法語(yǔ)言各層次的失范現(xiàn)象基礎(chǔ)上,將立法語(yǔ)言的失范分為語(yǔ)言規(guī)則失范和語(yǔ)言風(fēng)格失范兩個(gè)層級(jí),重點(diǎn)考查的是大連市立法語(yǔ)言規(guī)則失范現(xiàn)象,即對(duì)詞匯方面、語(yǔ)法方面、邏輯方面、標(biāo)點(diǎn)符號(hào)等方面出現(xiàn)的問題進(jìn)行量化糾錯(cuò)。 論文第四章對(duì)立法語(yǔ)言失范的危害、原因、對(duì)策等問題進(jìn)行分析。語(yǔ)言規(guī)則層次的失范較明顯,問題多且不易被重視,通過提高立法者素質(zhì)和改進(jìn)立法過程等手段可得到相應(yīng)改變。語(yǔ)言風(fēng)格層的失范相對(duì)隱蔽,且有些問題是由立法語(yǔ)言本身的內(nèi)在矛盾決定的,所引起的失范問題難以及時(shí)、完全消除。筆者知識(shí)結(jié)構(gòu)單薄,對(duì)立法語(yǔ)言失范問題提出的建議是膚淺的。不過,本文立足于立法技術(shù),詳實(shí)地分析大連市部分立法語(yǔ)料,一定程度上為大連市立法語(yǔ)言失范研究提供具體實(shí)踐參照依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:There are not a few problems in the use of words, grammatical norms, punctuation marks, logical structures and so on in some of the laws and regulations that have been promulgated locally or even in the more important parts of the country. Most of the previous studies have focused on the "great law" of the state. The angles and levels are mainly reflected in the laws of various levels of structure of the legislative language, the special legislative sentence patterns and expressions, the translation of legal texts, and so on, even if there are legislative techniques involved. However, the study of legislative language anomie is also very rare, especially local laws and regulations. The second chapter of the thesis is based on the theories of linguists such as Lu Jianming, Li Zhenyu and Pan Qingyun on the study of legislative language. The definition of "legislative language" and "legislative technology" is described in the light of the meaning of jurisprudence. In the view of Mr. Pan Qingyun, the language used in legislation is called "legislative language"; The special technology for repealing laws was determined to be "legislative technology". The relationship between "legislative language" and "legal language". According to Liu Hongying and Tang Xiaotian, the legal language was classified as legislative language and judicial language. Legislative language is a branch of legal language. The third chapter is based on the legislative technology, collect and sort out a considerable number of Dalian local laws and regulations, and make an objective description of them; although starting from the specific laws and regulations, but not only in the data and case collation, On the basis of systematic observation and analysis of the abnormal phenomena in different levels of the legislative language, the anomie of the legislative language is divided into two levels, namely, the loss of language rules and the loss of language style. The focus is on the abnormal phenomenon of Dalian's legislative language rules, that is, quantifying and correcting the problems in vocabulary, grammar, logic, punctuation and so on. The fourth chapter analyzes the harm, cause, countermeasure and so on of the legislative language anomie. The level of the language rules is obvious, the problem is many and not easy to be paid attention to. By improving the quality of the legislator and improving the legislative process, the corresponding changes can be obtained. The language style level is relatively hidden, and some problems are determined by the inherent contradictions of the legislative language itself. Completely eliminated. The author's knowledge structure is weak, and the suggestion to the problem of legislative language anomie is superficial. However, based on the legislative technology, this paper analyzes some legislative corpus of Dalian City in detail. To a certain extent, the study of Dalian legislative language anomie provides a specific reference for practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D90-055;H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳炯;論立法語(yǔ)言的風(fēng)格特征[J];畢節(jié)師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2005年01期

2 閔海峰;夏天;;當(dāng)前中國(guó)立法語(yǔ)言不規(guī)范問題淺析[J];研究生法學(xué);2002年02期

3 潘慶云;;立法語(yǔ)言論略[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年01期

4 湯嘯天;;法律語(yǔ)言研究應(yīng)當(dāng)強(qiáng)化立法語(yǔ)言的審校服務(wù)[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

5 婁開陽(yáng);陸儉明;;論立法語(yǔ)言規(guī)范中的技術(shù)問題[J];修辭學(xué)習(xí);2009年03期

6 陳天恩;立法語(yǔ)言,嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)為要[J];語(yǔ)言文字應(yīng)用;1999年04期

7 劉紅嬰;立法技術(shù)中的幾種語(yǔ)言表述問題[J];語(yǔ)言文字應(yīng)用;2002年03期

8 王潔;;從“立法時(shí)代”到“修法時(shí)代”的中國(guó)大陸法律語(yǔ)言研究[J];語(yǔ)言文字應(yīng)用;2010年04期

9 寧致遠(yuǎn);立法語(yǔ)言更應(yīng)符合語(yǔ)言規(guī)范[J];語(yǔ)言文字應(yīng)用;1999年03期

10 趙微;;立法語(yǔ)言的內(nèi)涵及外延——基于語(yǔ)言學(xué)及法學(xué)雙重視角的定義[J];法治論叢(上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2008年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊穎;論立法語(yǔ)言的規(guī)范化[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1690529