本文選題：清算義務人　切入點：民事責任　出處：《蘭州大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 本文將綜合運用法解釋學、法比較學、法經(jīng)濟學、法社會學等研究方法。通過材料的整理,研讀相關(guān)著述,立足我國法律理論和社會實際,吸收國外最新理論研究成果,結(jié)合具體公司法案例,力求對清算義務人惡意侵權(quán)和欺詐注銷的民事責任做出深刻闡述,并對存在問題提出合理的解決方案。全文由引言、正文和結(jié)語三部分組成,其中正文部分包括案情介紹及問題的提出、清算義務人制度、清算義務人惡意侵權(quán)和欺詐注銷的民事責任及公司清算義務人制度的完善共四個部分。 引言：簡要概述了所涉論題的研究背景、研究現(xiàn)狀以及開展研究工作的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。 第一部分：案情介紹及問題的提出。本部分以“聲像出版社訴陳某等責任糾紛案”為例,結(jié)合案件審理情況和雙方爭議焦點,提出清算義務人制度、清算義務人惡意侵權(quán)和欺詐注銷的民事責任等法律問題,以及解決這些問題的理論和現(xiàn)實意義。 第二部分：清算義務人制度。本部分運用法解釋學、法比較學的方法,結(jié)合相關(guān)法理和具體案情對清算人和清算義務人進行區(qū)分,對清算義務人的主體范圍加以界定；從法的公平價值和法的秩序價值兩個方面闡釋清算義務人民事責任制度構(gòu)建的價值體現(xiàn)；以“信義義務理論”等為基礎(chǔ),闡釋清算義務人侵權(quán)民事責任制度構(gòu)建的法理基礎(chǔ)。在我國,清算義務人民事責任制度的構(gòu)建,更加符合我國的立法現(xiàn)狀和司法審判實際： 第三部分：清算義務人惡意侵權(quán)和欺詐注銷的民事責任。本部分詳細介紹了清算義務人因作為侵權(quán)行為對公司債務承擔民事責任的兩種情形：(1)惡意侵權(quán),即惡意處置公司財產(chǎn)的民事責任；(2)欺詐注銷,即沒有經(jīng)過公司清算程序,以虛假的清算報告騙取公司登記機關(guān)辦理法人注銷登記的民事責任。 第四部分：公司清算義務人制度的完善。 結(jié)語：本部分概括總結(jié)了論文涉及的相關(guān)法律問題,闡明作者觀點。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we will comprehensively apply the methods of law hermeneutics, law comparison, law economics, law sociology and so on. Through the arrangement of materials, we will study the relevant works and absorb the latest foreign theoretical research achievements based on our country's legal theory and social reality. Combined with the specific company law cases, this paper tries to make a deep exposition of the civil liability of the liquidation obligor for malicious infringement and fraud cancellation, and puts forward a reasonable solution to the existing problems. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The main part includes four parts: the introduction of the case, the system of liquidation obligor, the civil liability of malicious tort and fraud cancellation of liquidation obligor and the perfection of company liquidation obligor system. Introduction: this paper briefly summarizes the research background, research status and theoretical and practical significance of the research. The first part: the introduction of the case and the presentation of the questions. This part takes the case of Acoustic and Video Publishing House v. Chen as an example, combining the trial of the case and the focus of the dispute between the two sides, puts forward the liquidation obligor system. Legal problems such as malicious tort and fraudulent cancellation of civil liability of liquidation obligor, and the theoretical and practical significance of solving these problems. The second part: the liquidation obligor system. This part uses the method of legal hermeneutics and legal comparison to distinguish the liquidator from the liquidation obligor and define the scope of the subject of liquidation obligor. Based on the theory of fiduciary obligation, this paper explains the value embodiment of the civil liability system of liquidation obligor from two aspects: the fair value of law and the value of order value of law. In China, the construction of civil liability system of liquidation obligor is more in line with the current situation of legislation and the reality of judicial trial in our country. Part three: civil liability of liquidation obligor for malicious infringement and fraud cancellation. That is to say, the civil liability of maliciously disposing of the property of the company is written off fraudulently, that is, without going through the liquidation procedure of the company, the civil liability of the company registration authority for deregistration of the legal person is deceived by the false liquidation report. Part 4th: the perfection of company liquidation obligor system. Conclusion: this part summarizes the relevant legal issues involved in the thesis and clarifies the author's point of view.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D920.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐浩萍;控制股東利潤操縱的動機及其監(jiān)管研究[J];財經(jīng)研究;2005年02期

2 馮果;論控制股的轉(zhuǎn)讓[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;1999年03期

3 汪傳才;控制股東的誠信義務與少數(shù)股東的保護[J];福建政法管理干部學院學報;2001年01期

4 龍翼飛;何堯德;;我國公司法最新修訂評析[J];法學雜志;2006年02期

5 孫光焰;也論公司、股東與董事之法律關(guān)系[J];法學評論;1999年06期

6 王保樹,楊繼;論股份公司控制股東的義務與責任[J];法學;2002年02期

7 曹志才;;企業(yè)法人被不當注銷后的民事責任承擔[J];法學;2006年03期

8 廖理;沈紅波;酈金梁;;股權(quán)分置改革與上市公司治理的實證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2008年05期

9 呂濤;論公司強制清算中的責任承擔[J];河北法學;2001年01期

10 張永欽;論公司解散后清算人不能選任時的法律救濟[J];江西財經(jīng)大學學報;2005年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 吳曉鋒;[N];法制日報;2007年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 孫強;企業(yè)清算法律制度研究[D];中國政法大學;2003年

，

本文編號：1641629