本文選題：批判法學(xué)　切入點(diǎn)：德沃金　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 批判法學(xué)是當(dāng)代美國重要新興法學(xué)流派之一,它主要有三種思想淵源:西方馬克思主義、現(xiàn)實(shí)主義法學(xué)以及后現(xiàn)代主義批判法學(xué)在其產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展過程中,陸續(xù)涌現(xiàn)出一大批杰出的學(xué)者,并逐漸形成了自己獨(dú)立的學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)和學(xué)術(shù)方法。 德沃金是當(dāng)代美國最著名的法理學(xué)家之一,他的學(xué)說主要包括基于平等關(guān)心和尊重的權(quán)利論、基于原則論、限制法官自由裁量權(quán)的法律整體性理念,并將上述思想運(yùn)用到對(duì)美國憲法的道德解讀中去,對(duì)法律哲學(xué)和法律實(shí)踐都有著深刻的見解。 關(guān)于法律的確定性、法的中立性和意識(shí)形態(tài)及美國憲法解釋等熱點(diǎn)學(xué)術(shù)問題,批判法學(xué)和德沃金持有許多顯著不同、沖突嚴(yán)重、交鋒激烈的觀點(diǎn),肯尼迪、鮑爾金、加貝爾、圖什內(nèi)特、麥金農(nóng)等批判法學(xué)代表人物分別在以上諸方面對(duì)德沃金發(fā)起了猛烈的批判。 批判法學(xué)對(duì)德沃金學(xué)說的批判能夠引發(fā)我們很多的思考,其中的批判原因關(guān)涉到批判法學(xué)的自由主義法學(xué)觀,其中的批判方法突出表現(xiàn)于意識(shí)形態(tài)批判尤其是解構(gòu)的運(yùn)用,其中的批判意義集中反映在時(shí)代意義、學(xué)術(shù)意義和對(duì)于中國法學(xué)的啟發(fā)意義上,使我們受益良多。
[Abstract]:Critical law is one of the important emerging schools of law in contemporary America. It has three main ideological origins: Western Marxism, realistic jurisprudence and postmodernist critical law in the process of its emergence and development. A large number of outstanding scholars emerged, and gradually formed their own independent academic views and academic methods. Dworkin is one of the most famous jurists in contemporary America. His theories mainly include the theory of right based on equal care and respect, the theory of principle and the whole idea of law which limits the discretion of judges. The above ideas are applied to the moral interpretation of the American Constitution and have profound views on legal philosophy and legal practice. On such hot academic issues as legal certainty, the neutrality and ideology of law and the interpretation of the United States Constitution, critical jurisprudence and Dworkin hold many markedly different, serious conflicts and fierce confrontations, Kennedy, Balkin, Gaber, etc. Tushinette, McKinnon and other critical legal representatives in the above aspects launched a fierce criticism of Dworkin. The criticism of Dworkin's theory by critical law can lead us to a lot of thinking, among which the critical reasons are related to the liberal legal view of critical jurisprudence, and the critical methods are manifested in the ideological criticism, especially in the application of deconstruction. The critical significance is reflected in the significance of the times, the academic significance and the enlightening significance of Chinese law, which benefit us a lot.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 雷晶;疑難案件中法官自由裁量權(quán)的終結(jié)？[D];上海交通大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1640452