本文選題：景觀　切入點(diǎn)：景觀利益　出處：《河海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2012年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：日本最高法院2006年3月30日判決認(rèn)為良好的景觀具有客觀的價(jià)值,"與良好的景觀相鄰接的地域內(nèi)居住的、日常享受該景觀惠澤之人"擁有個(gè)人的景觀利益,并確認(rèn)景觀利益是值得法律保護(hù)的利益,侵犯該景觀利益會(huì)構(gòu)成侵權(quán)行為,應(yīng)負(fù)損害賠償之責(zé)。該判決對(duì)我國(guó)景觀權(quán)或景觀利益的保護(hù)問(wèn)題有如下啟迪:公權(quán)私權(quán)化,公共利益私人化,綜合利用已有的法律調(diào)整手段來(lái)解決環(huán)境問(wèn)題,在立法上確認(rèn)景觀價(jià)值,循序漸進(jìn)解決環(huán)境問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:In March 30th 2006, the Supreme Court of Japan ruled that a good landscape has objective value, and that "those who live in areas adjacent to the good landscape and enjoy the benefits of the landscape on a daily basis" have their own landscape interests. It is also recognized that landscape interests are interests worthy of legal protection, and infringement of the landscape interests will constitute an act of infringement, and shall be liable for damages. The judgment has the following implications for the protection of landscape rights or landscape interests in our country: the privatization of public rights, Private public interest, comprehensive use of existing legal adjustment means to solve environmental problems, in legislation to confirm the value of landscape, gradually solve environmental problems.
【作者單位】： 河海大學(xué)法學(xué)院;南京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D931.3;DD913
，

本文編號(hào)：1639825