本文選題：民國(guó)時(shí)期　切入點(diǎn)：息訟　出處：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在中國(guó)古代的發(fā)展歷史中,息訟以及息訟機(jī)制源流久遠(yuǎn)。對(duì)于在中國(guó)這個(gè)儒家思想占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位的國(guó)度來(lái)說(shuō),息訟已經(jīng)成為了歷朝官員乃至天子,所奉行的至高準(zhǔn)則和社會(huì)治理目標(biāo)。我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)息訟制度得到了社會(huì)的廣泛好評(píng)和充分肯定,并作為“東方經(jīng)驗(yàn)”得以保留下來(lái),也是碩果僅存的中華法系在當(dāng)代仍然發(fā)揮影響力的歷史成就。我國(guó)民事調(diào)解制度很大一部分就是受到了中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)息訟制度的影響。 民事調(diào)解制度,從大的范圍上來(lái)看,是屬于民事訴訟的一種制度,但是從解決民事糾紛上來(lái)看,其與民事訴訟處于并列的狀態(tài),其是由第三方居中進(jìn)行勸解糾紛而使雙方互相妥協(xié)退讓,從而化解糾紛的一種民事訴訟程序。無(wú)可厚非民國(guó)時(shí)期是我國(guó)法律現(xiàn)代化的大發(fā)展時(shí)期,民國(guó)時(shí)期在中國(guó)整個(gè)法律發(fā)展歷程中有著不可取代的地位。從清末修律開(kāi)始,中國(guó)的法律現(xiàn)代化就已初具成效,經(jīng)過(guò)民國(guó)初期對(duì)法律的完善,‘中國(guó)的法律已日趨西化。自1911年辛亥革命以后,到1949年新中國(guó)成立之前,當(dāng)時(shí)的中國(guó)處于社會(huì)動(dòng)蕩、軍閥割據(jù)狀態(tài),而東西方文化的激烈碰撞,也使得當(dāng)時(shí)的法律制度具有一定的時(shí)代特色。而在對(duì)當(dāng)時(shí)的民事調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行分析探討的過(guò)程中,更以晚清政府出臺(tái)的《民事訴訟律草案》以及其后出臺(tái)的《民事調(diào)解法》及《民事訴訟法》為核心以及重要標(biāo)志。 當(dāng)今中國(guó)所實(shí)施的民事調(diào)解制度是我國(guó)司法制度的一大特色,它不僅繼承了民國(guó)時(shí)期的優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng),而且是中國(guó)法治文化和長(zhǎng)期司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)相結(jié)合的智慧結(jié)晶,民事調(diào)解制度也是我國(guó)民事審判中最富有特色的一種制度。這種以“調(diào)解為主”的審判方式不僅在國(guó)內(nèi)得到很好的適用,并且在國(guó)際上也飽受好評(píng)。 本文的主體包括7項(xiàng)內(nèi)容, 引言‘,簡(jiǎn)單的介紹了民事調(diào)解以及民事調(diào)解制度在中國(guó)的歷史長(zhǎng)河中所處于的地位。 第一部分,評(píng)析了中國(guó)的傳統(tǒng)息訟機(jī)制。這一部分主要從中國(guó)古代的息訟機(jī)制溯源、中國(guó)近代的糾紛調(diào)解機(jī)制和中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)息訟機(jī)制的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與智慧三個(gè)方面來(lái)闡述中國(guó)的傳統(tǒng)息訟機(jī)制。 第二部分,概述了民國(guó)時(shí)期民事調(diào)解制度。這一部分主要從民國(guó)時(shí)期民事調(diào)解制度的背景和立法概況兩個(gè)方面來(lái)記述。 第三部分,論述了民間調(diào)解以及它的得失。該部分先敘述民國(guó)時(shí)期民間調(diào)解對(duì)傳統(tǒng)民間調(diào)解的沿革,之后敘述了民間調(diào)解的基本途徑以及其特征,之后再?gòu)拿耖g調(diào)解的運(yùn)作過(guò)程來(lái)進(jìn)行探析,從而讓我們充分了解民間調(diào)解和它的得失。 第四部分,論述了行政調(diào)解及其得失。此部分先從我國(guó)民國(guó)時(shí)期至今行政調(diào)解的狀況進(jìn)行闡述,之后再記述鄉(xiāng)、鎮(zhèn)、縣調(diào)解委員會(huì)及其運(yùn)作規(guī)程,最后再總結(jié)出行政調(diào)解的積極和消極的作用,從而讓我們對(duì)此部分有所了解。 第五部分,論述了司法調(diào)解及其得失。這部分一開(kāi)始從《民事調(diào)節(jié)法》的頒布和它的立法原則開(kāi)始概述。之后敘述了《民事調(diào)解法》及相關(guān)法律當(dāng)中的司法調(diào)解,然后概述民事調(diào)解與民事訴訟的銜接。 第六部分,總結(jié)了民國(guó)時(shí)期民事調(diào)解制度的經(jīng)驗(yàn)以及對(duì)當(dāng)代的借鑒。從“批判地借鑒古代息訟經(jīng)驗(yàn)”、“正確評(píng)價(jià)以息訟為目的的調(diào)解制度”、“積極推進(jìn)基層法院尤其是人民法庭調(diào)解息訟能力建設(shè)”三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述。
[Abstract]:In China ancient history, the origin of litigation and litigation mechanism. For long occupied the leading position in the Chinese Confucian country, interest litigation has become a Chinese officer and Emperor pursued high standards of governance and social goals. Our traditional lawsuit system has been widely praised by society and fully sure, and as the "Oriental experience" to be preserved, but also the Chinese legal system There remained but a single one. still exert its great influence on the contemporary. The civil mediation system in China is a large part of affected China traditional lawsuit system.
The civil mediation system, from the point of view, is a civil action in a system, but from the point of view to resolve civil disputes, which is tied with the state of civil litigation, which is composed of third party centered persuasion disputes make mutual compromise, a civil lawsuit procedure to resolve disputes no ground for blame. The period of the Republic of China is a period of great development of legal modernization in China, the period of the Republic of China has an irreplaceable role in the development of the China law. From the beginning of the late Qing Dynasty, the modernization of law China has begun to take effect, through the improvement of the law in the early Republic of China, "Chinese law has become increasingly westernized. Since 1911 1911 before the revolution, to the founding of new Chinese in 1949, at the time of the China in social unrest, warlords, and Western culture fierce collision, but also makes the legal system when certain The characteristics of the times, and in the process of analysis and discussion of the civil mediation system at that time, it is the core of the civil law draft issued by the late Qing Dynasty and the civil mediation law and civil procedure law promulgated later.
The Chinese implementation of the civil mediation system is a major feature of our judicial system, it not only inherited the fine tradition of the Republic of China, and is the crystallization of the wisdom China legal culture and long-term judicial practice experience combined, a system of civil mediation system of China's civil trial is the most distinctive of this. "Mediation" trial not only is good at home, and also suffering from the international praise.
The main body of this article consists of 7 items.
The introduction briefly introduces the status of civil mediation and the system of civil mediation in the history of China.
The first part analyzes the traditional litigation mechanism in China. This part mainly expounds the traditional litigation mechanism in China from three aspects, namely, tracing the origin of the litigation mechanism in ancient China, tracing the dispute mediation mechanism in modern China and the experience and wisdom of the traditional interest litigation mechanism in China.
The second part summarizes the civil mediation system in the Republic of China. This part is mainly from two aspects: the background and legislative outline of the civil mediation system in the Republic of China.
絎笁閮ㄥ垎,璁鴻堪浜?jiǎn)姘戦棿璋冭В浠ュ強(qiáng)瀹冪殑寰楀ぃ?

本文編號(hào)：1635214