本文選題：財(cái)產(chǎn)征收　切入點(diǎn)：公共利益　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 我國(guó)是一個(gè)現(xiàn)代化的后發(fā)國(guó)家,對(duì)于統(tǒng)一的財(cái)產(chǎn)征收、行政補(bǔ)償制度還未建立。法律制度的不健全,使得在進(jìn)行財(cái)產(chǎn)征收時(shí)出現(xiàn)許多問題和矛盾,如因?yàn)闆]有法律全面規(guī)制,使得地方政府偷鉆法律空子,違法行使征收權(quán),嚴(yán)重危害財(cái)產(chǎn)被征收人的合法權(quán)益。它山之石可以攻玉,我們應(yīng)該對(duì)其他國(guó)家完善的財(cái)產(chǎn)征收制度進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的研究和學(xué)習(xí),結(jié)合具體國(guó)情,為我國(guó)完善財(cái)產(chǎn)征收制度提供有益的借鑒與啟示。 本文著重系統(tǒng)地比較中外國(guó)家及其他地區(qū)的財(cái)產(chǎn)征收制度,試圖從中找出一些對(duì)我國(guó)有借鑒性的可行性制度,從而完善我國(guó)的財(cái)產(chǎn)征收制度。本文共分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分闡釋財(cái)產(chǎn)征收的基礎(chǔ)理論。第二部分為財(cái)產(chǎn)征收的正當(dāng)性前提—公共利益。第三部分為文章的重點(diǎn),該部分為財(cái)產(chǎn)征收立法比較研究；分為四節(jié),首先是對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)征收程序的比較,其次是財(cái)產(chǎn)征收補(bǔ)償模式的比較,再次是財(cái)產(chǎn)征收救濟(jì)方式比較,最后對(duì)前三節(jié)進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)比較后得出研究結(jié)論,即我國(guó)在財(cái)產(chǎn)征收程序、補(bǔ)償、救濟(jì)方面存在的缺陷。第四部分主要是對(duì)完善我國(guó)財(cái)產(chǎn)征收法律制度提出一些建議,本部分主要從完善公共利益的實(shí)體界定及程序設(shè)計(jì)的建議；對(duì)規(guī)范及健全我國(guó)財(cái)產(chǎn)征收程序的建議；以及建議我國(guó)在財(cái)產(chǎn)征收補(bǔ)償中推行市場(chǎng)介入機(jī)制,實(shí)行公正補(bǔ)償;著重要貫徹落實(shí)補(bǔ)償?shù)目沙掷m(xù)安置及社會(huì)保障；建議規(guī)范行政救濟(jì),引入訴訟機(jī)制；最后提出制定統(tǒng)一的《財(cái)產(chǎn)征收法》的設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:Our country is a modern developing country, for the unified property expropriation, the administrative compensation system has not been established. The legal system is not perfect, so there are many problems and contradictions in the process of property expropriation, such as because there is no comprehensive regulation of the law. It makes local governments steal holes in the law, illegally exercise the right to levy, and seriously endanger the legitimate rights and interests of the property expropriated. It is a stone that can attack the jade. We should systematically study and study the property expropriation system perfect in other countries. Combined with the specific national conditions, for our country to improve the property expropriation system to provide useful reference and inspiration. This paper focuses on the systematic comparison of property expropriation systems between China and foreign countries and other regions, and tries to find out some feasible systems that can be used for reference in order to perfect the property expropriation system in China. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part explains the basic theory of property expropriation. The second part is the legitimate premise of property expropriation-public interest. The third part is the focus of the article, this part is the comparative study of property expropriation legislation; it is divided into four sections. The first is the comparison of the property expropriation procedure, the second is the comparison of the compensation mode of the property expropriation, and the second is the comparison of the relief mode of the property expropriation. Finally, the conclusion is drawn after the systematic comparison of the first three sections, that is, the property expropriation procedure, the compensation in our country. Part 4th mainly puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legal system of property expropriation in our country, this part mainly from perfecting the entity definition of public interest and the suggestion of procedure design; Suggestions on standardizing and perfecting the procedure of property expropriation in our country, as well as the suggestion that our country should carry out market intervention mechanism in property expropriation compensation, implement fair compensation, carry out the sustainable resettlement and social security of compensation. This paper proposes to standardize administrative relief and introduce litigation mechanism, and finally puts forward the idea of making a unified property expropriation law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D920.4

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 欒婧;管制征收理論探析[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

2 吳昕潔;對(duì)我國(guó)土地征收補(bǔ)償制度的研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1586999