本文選題：本土資源論　切入點(diǎn)：法治現(xiàn)代化　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自黨的十五大報(bào)告將“依法治國”確立為治國方略以來，我國法治建設(shè)取得可喜成績，但不可否認(rèn)的是我國尚與法治國家或法治社會存在很大差距，十八大報(bào)告中進(jìn)一步提出“全面推進(jìn)依法治國”、“加快建設(shè)社會主義法治國家”，在這樣的背景下探討如何實(shí)現(xiàn)以及如何更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)法治現(xiàn)代化，，具有著極大的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。作為法治研究重要學(xué)說的“本土資源論”，曾經(jīng)影響和啟發(fā)了眾多學(xué)人，本文正是由“本土資源論”出發(fā)，全面認(rèn)識法治的“本土資源”，進(jìn)一步厘清對法治的“本土資源”認(rèn)識上的爭議和利用上的誤區(qū)，嘗試論證我國法治現(xiàn)代化的“本土資源”路徑——實(shí)現(xiàn)政府推進(jìn)型法治道路之上對“本土資源”最大化利用。 本文結(jié)構(gòu)包括三大章八小節(jié)。第一章主要介紹何謂法治的“本土資源”。這部分內(nèi)容，首先從“本土資源論”提出的社會背景、理論背景展開，進(jìn)而從為何需要法治的“本土資源”、如何界定法治的“本土資源”兩部分三小節(jié)邏輯性的、漸進(jìn)性的認(rèn)識法治的“本土資源”，最后通過對“本土資源論”認(rèn)識論及方法論上價(jià)值分析，肯定“本土資源論”對我國法學(xué)研究、法治建構(gòu)的重要意義所在。 第二章主要介紹“本土資源論”引發(fā)的爭議。以最具代表性的兩種批判學(xué)說：謝暉的“引進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)論”和鄧正來的“中國法律理想圖景”來回顧爭議。“真理不辨不明”，法學(xué)研究需要學(xué)說爭鳴，分析爭議，有助于我們?nèi)�、客觀的認(rèn)識“本土資源論”——堅(jiān)持其合理性、承認(rèn)其矛盾性。不僅于此，爭議還給我們的法學(xué)研究、法治研究帶來這樣的理論意義：警惕“法治保守主義”、反思“法律實(shí)用主義”、認(rèn)真對待“本土資源”。在全面認(rèn)識爭議的基礎(chǔ)之上，本文進(jìn)一步厘清對“本土資源”的兩大認(rèn)識誤區(qū)：復(fù)古主義與排他主義。 第三章主要介紹我國法治現(xiàn)代化的“本土資源”路徑。“本土資源論”功在“破”而不在“立”，“本土資源論”本身以及其支持們一直以來重心集中在論證其合理性和必要性，對究竟如何利用法治的“本土資源”，對如何使得“本土資源論”從理論層面走向法律實(shí)踐，卻較少研究。作為同是“本土資源論”支持者的筆者而言，嘗試論證一條我國法治現(xiàn)代化的“本土資源”路徑。這部分第一節(jié)指明我國當(dāng)下一則處于政府推進(jìn)型法治道路的法治現(xiàn)實(shí)，二則無可能走上社會演進(jìn)型法治道路發(fā)展模式，進(jìn)而得出第二節(jié)的主題結(jié)論：實(shí)現(xiàn)對政府推進(jìn)型法治道路下“本土資源”的最大化利用——立法面向中國現(xiàn)實(shí)、司法融合民俗習(xí)慣、法學(xué)研究本土問題。
[Abstract]:Since the report of the 15th National Congress of the Party established "ruling the country according to law" as the general plan of governing the country, China has made gratifying achievements in the construction of the rule of law, but it is undeniable that there is still a big gap between our country and the country under the rule of law or the society under the rule of law. In the 18 report, it was further proposed that "comprehensively promote the rule of law" and "accelerate the construction of a socialist country ruled by law." under such a background, it is discussed how to realize and how to better realize the modernization of the rule of law. It has great theoretical and practical significance. As an important theory in the study of rule of law, the theory of native resources has influenced and inspired many scholars. Fully understand the "local resources" of the rule of law, and further clarify the dispute on the understanding of "local resources" of the rule of law and the misunderstanding of their utilization. This paper tries to demonstrate the path of "local resources" in the modernization of our country's rule of law-to maximize the utilization of "local resources" on the road of government's promoting the rule of law. The structure of this paper consists of three chapters and eight sections. The first chapter mainly introduces what is the "local resources" of the rule of law. Then, from why the "local resources" of the rule of law are needed, how to define the "local resources" of the rule of law is logical in two sections and three sections. Finally, by analyzing the epistemology and methodology value of "native resource theory", the author affirms the significance of "native resource theory" to the study of law and the construction of rule of law in our country. The second chapter mainly introduces the controversy caused by "Native Resource Theory". It reviews the controversy with two most representative critical theories: Xie Hui's "introduction experience Theory" and Deng Zhenglai's "the ideal Prospect of Chinese Law". "unclear," the need for legal research to argue with the doctrine, The analysis of disputes is helpful for us to fully and objectively understand "the theory of native resources"-to insist on its rationality and admit its contradiction. The research on the rule of law brings such theoretical significance: to be on guard against the "conservatism of the rule of law", to reflect on the "legal pragmatism", to treat "local resources" seriously, and on the basis of a comprehensive understanding of the controversy, This paper further clarifies two misunderstandings of local resources: retro-antiquity and exclusivity. The third chapter mainly introduces the path of "local resources" in the modernization of our country's rule of law. "Local resource theory" is "breaking" rather than "standing", and "local resource theory" itself and its support have always focused on demonstrating its rationality and necessity. As to how to make use of the "local resources" of the rule of law and how to make the "local resource theory" move from the theoretical level to the legal practice, it is less studied. As the author is also a supporter of the "local resource theory", The first section of this part points out that the current legal reality of our country is in the road of the government advancing the rule of law, and the second is that it is impossible to take the development mode of the social evolution type of the rule of law. Then the main conclusions of section two are as follows: to realize the maximum utilization of "local resources" under the road of the government advancing the rule of law-the legislation is facing the reality of China, the folk custom of judicial integration, and the study of local problems by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 謝暉;法治保守主義思潮評析——與蘇力先生對話[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年06期

2 湯唯;郭曉燕;;地方立法中的法律文化本土資源[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

3 王干,王浩;什么才是法治的本土資源——兼對蘇力本土資源理論的考察[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

4 張法 ,張頤武 ,王一川;從“現(xiàn)代性”到“中華性”——新知識型的探尋[J];文藝爭鳴;1994年02期

5 支鳳巧;;淺談法治的本土資源[J];新西部(下旬.理論版);2011年02期

6 鄧正來;中國法學(xué)向何處去(下)——對蘇力“本土資源論”的批判[J];政法論壇;2005年03期

7 鄧正來;;中國法學(xué)的批判與建構(gòu)——就《中國法學(xué)向何處去》答吉林大學(xué)理論法學(xué)讀書小組[J];政法論壇;2006年01期

8 蘇力;市場經(jīng)濟(jì)對立法的啟示[J];中國法學(xué);1996年04期

9 許紀(jì)霖;文化認(rèn)同的困境──90年代中國知識界的反西化思潮[J];戰(zhàn)略與管理;1996年05期

本文編號：1582065