本文關(guān)鍵詞： 表見(jiàn)代理 共有關(guān)系 管理性規(guī)范 效力性規(guī)范　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：夫妻一方轉(zhuǎn)讓個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)，一方未經(jīng)另一方同意，相對(duì)人有理由相信行為人具有代理權(quán)的，則構(gòu)成表見(jiàn)代理，相對(duì)人可以表見(jiàn)代理主張?jiān)摯硇袨橛行�。關(guān)于《個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)法》第15條規(guī)定的個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)變更登記的性質(zhì)，目前學(xué)界有兩種觀點(diǎn)，即“管理性規(guī)范說(shuō)”和“效力性規(guī)范說(shuō)”。關(guān)于該變更登記的性質(zhì)應(yīng)采用管理性規(guī)范說(shuō)，即個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)投資人發(fā)生變更應(yīng)當(dāng)?shù)怯浂瓷暾?qǐng)辦理變更登記的，依照法律應(yīng)受到相應(yīng)的行政處罰，，但并不影響轉(zhuǎn)讓行為的效力。但是《個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)》第15條的規(guī)定比較模糊，表述不夠精確。只規(guī)定了存續(xù)期間的變更事項(xiàng)應(yīng)依法按規(guī)定日期進(jìn)行變更登記，但并未規(guī)定違反該規(guī)定應(yīng)承擔(dān)的責(zé)任及對(duì)變更行為的效力如何。這種立法漏洞導(dǎo)致了理論爭(zhēng)議不斷。 樣本案例的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)是，袁某是否有權(quán)與王某簽訂《采礦廠轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議》，未經(jīng)變更登記的《采礦廠轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議》效力如何。王某認(rèn)為袁某經(jīng)營(yíng)管理某采礦廠的行為足以證明袁某有權(quán)與其簽訂該協(xié)議，故該協(xié)議合法有效，王某則認(rèn)為袁某不是采礦廠是出資人，故其無(wú)權(quán)簽訂該協(xié)議。參照法院裁判，以夫妻代理為入口，通過(guò)對(duì)夫妻一方處分個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)的權(quán)利來(lái)源分析以及個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)權(quán)屬變更登記對(duì)買賣合同效力的影響分析，解決所選案例的兩個(gè)主要爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)，即夫妻一方處分共有財(cái)產(chǎn)的代理權(quán)問(wèn)題和個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)變更登記的效力問(wèn)題。 最后，在評(píng)析兩審法院判決的基礎(chǔ)上說(shuō)明夫妻一方處分除日常家事以外的其他事務(wù)時(shí)，在第三人善意且無(wú)過(guò)失的情況下應(yīng)按表見(jiàn)代理處理。另外個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)關(guān)于變更登記的規(guī)定略顯模糊，存在不少弊端，通過(guò)對(duì)管理性規(guī)范與效力性規(guī)范優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)的分析，確認(rèn)該變更登記為管理性規(guī)范，便于在市場(chǎng)規(guī)制和司法事務(wù)中管理和操作。
[Abstract]:One of the spouses the transfer of individual owned enterprises, a party without the consent of the other party, the party has reason to believe that the person has the right of agent of apparent agency, people can relatively apparent agency claims that the agent acts effectively. On the individual proprietorship enterprise law "provisions of article fifteenth of the sole proprietorship enterprise registration in nature, there are two kinds of viewpoints, namely" management norms "and" effective norms ". On the nature of the change of registration should adopt the management standards that said, the sole proprietorship enterprise investors change shall be registered and did not apply for change of registration, in accordance with the law shall be subject to administrative penalties. But did not affect the effectiveness of transfer behavior. But the provisions of < > fifteenth of the sole proprietorship enterprise is vague, expression is not accurate enough. Only the provisions of the alteration of duration should be carried out in accordance with the change in registration according to the provisions of the date, but There is no provision for the liability for violation of the provision and the effect on the action of the change. This legislative loophole has led to a continuous theoretical controversy.
The focus of controversy cases, Yuanmou is right and Wang signed a mining factory transfer agreement > <, > mining factory transfer agreement without registration. The validity of the < Wang Yuanmou behavior management a mining factory proves that the yuan in its right to sign the agreement, the agreement is legally valid Wang believes, Yuanmou not mining factory is invested, so it has no right to sign the agreement. According to the court, to the couple agent for the entrance, according to one of the spouses to dispose of individual proprietorship enterprises the right source of analysis as well as the sole proprietorship enterprise ownership change registration analysis of the impact on the validity of contracts, to solve the two major the selected point of controversy of the case, the validity of the registration is one of the spouses of disposal of property rights agent and sole proprietorship enterprise change.
Finally, that one of the spouses to dispose of other matters except the daily chores than on the evaluation and Analysis on the judgment of the trial court, in third people in good faith and without negligence cases should be according to the apparent agency. In addition the sole proprietorship enterprise on the change of the registration requirements slightly blurred, there are a lot of problems, through the analysis of the standard and the management the effective specification of the advantages and disadvantages, confirm the change of registration management norms, convenient management in the market regulation and judicial affairs and operation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王利明;;合同無(wú)效制度[J];人大法律評(píng)論;2012年01期

2 奚曉明;論表見(jiàn)代理[J];中外法學(xué);1996年04期

3 孫鵬;論無(wú)權(quán)處分行為——兼析《合同法》第51條[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年04期

4 尹田;我國(guó)新合同法中的表見(jiàn)代表制度評(píng)析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年05期

5 王利明,王軼;動(dòng)產(chǎn)善意取得制度研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1997年05期

6 孫鵬;表見(jiàn)代理構(gòu)成要件新論——以被代理人的過(guò)錯(cuò)問(wèn)題為中心[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2004年01期

7 張海燕;簡(jiǎn)論表見(jiàn)代理[J];政法論叢;2002年02期

8 王利明;論無(wú)權(quán)處分[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年03期

9 尹田;論“表見(jiàn)代理”[J];政治與法律;1988年06期

本文編號(hào)：1524511