本文關鍵詞： 司法 社會學解釋 法律解釋　出處：《山東大學》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 由于傳統(tǒng)的概念法學適用和解釋法律過于機械,逐漸暴露出其弊端。自由法學派和法社會學派在批判概念法學過于機械、僵化的基礎上引入了社會學解釋方法。隨后社會學解釋逐漸為人們所重視并且逐漸成為一種獨立的法律解釋方法。 在司法過程中,社會學解釋方法運用得也越來越廣泛,因為在實際的案件裁判過程中,社會學解釋能夠在一定程度上彌補文義解釋的不足,尤其是在法律語言詞句產(chǎn)生邊緣模糊的含義或一些疑難案件出現(xiàn)時,需要借助于社會學解釋,才能夠實現(xiàn)裁判的公正。因此,法官經(jīng)常會運用社會學解釋方法來解決一些復雜的案件,不僅使當前的案件得到解決,而且同樣也會使法律不會僵硬而能適應社會變化。 由于社會學解釋方法在當今的司法實踐中被廣泛的運用,因此本文試圖對司法過程中的社會學解釋進行研究。文章一共分為四個章:第一章主要是介紹了社會學解釋方法的概念。首先從社會學解釋方法的內涵和外延兩個方面進行具體的闡述;其次探討了社會學解釋和民間法的區(qū)別和聯(lián)系;最后分析了社會學解釋和其他法律方法之間的關系,進一步明確了社會學解釋所具有的特征。第二章主要分析了社會學解釋方法的運用條件。首先總體分析了社會學解釋方法的運用條件:也就是在適用法律規(guī)則時,運用文義解釋出現(xiàn)了復數(shù)解釋結果,需要進行社會后果的預測和社會目的衡量的時候才適用;其次分析了社會學解釋方法和法律規(guī)則之間的關系,社會學解釋要以法律規(guī)則為基本前提,特殊情況下可以對法律規(guī)則變通適用;最后分析了社會學解釋的具體運用領域,主要是從憲法、刑法、民法三個領域進行了具體分析。第三章著重探討了社會學解釋方法的應用步驟:首先是對于每一種解釋所產(chǎn)生的社會效果進行預測和分析,其次確定社會統(tǒng)制目的,用社會目的來衡量各種解釋所產(chǎn)生的社會效果,看何者解釋更符合社會目的;然后本章第二節(jié)通過“彭宇案”、“瀘州第三者繼承案”、“賈國宇案”等一些具體的案例來詳細闡述社會學解釋的應用條件和步驟。第四章主要對社會學解釋進行了評價。主要從社會學解釋方法的必要性和局限性進行了評價。首先分析了社會學解釋方法的必要性,其次分析了社會學解釋方法與“兩個效果的統(tǒng)一”之間的關系,兩者是一脈相承或者是相通的;最后探討了社會學解釋的局限性以及局限性應當如何解決。 總而言之,社會學解釋在司法過程中是不可缺少的一種法律解釋方法,它有特有的運用條件和運用步驟,也有一定的優(yōu)勢和局限性,在司法中,通常要與其他法律解釋結合起來,共同發(fā)揮作用,這樣才能達到良好的社會效果,實現(xiàn)社會正義和社會福利。
[Abstract]:Because the traditional conceptual jurisprudence is too mechanical to apply and interpret the law, it gradually exposes its disadvantages. The liberal law school and the legal society school criticize the concept law too mechanically. On the basis of fossilization, the sociological interpretation method was introduced, and then the sociological interpretation was gradually attached importance to and became an independent legal interpretation method. In the judicial process, the sociological interpretation method is used more and more widely, because in the actual case adjudication process, the sociological interpretation can make up for the deficiency of the meaning interpretation to a certain extent. Especially when the legal language words have vague meanings or some difficult cases appear, we need to use sociological explanation to realize the justice of the judgment. Judges often use sociological interpretation to solve complex cases, not only to solve the current cases, but also to make the law not rigid and adapt to social changes. Because the sociological interpretation method is widely used in the judicial practice nowadays, Therefore, this paper attempts to study the sociological interpretation in the judicial process. The article is divided into four chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the concept of the sociological interpretation method. First, it introduces the connotation and extension of the sociological interpretation method. The specific aspects of the elaboration; Secondly, it discusses the differences and relations between sociological interpretation and folk law, and finally analyzes the relationship between sociological interpretation and other legal methods. The second chapter mainly analyzes the application conditions of sociological interpretation methods. Firstly, it analyzes the application conditions of sociological interpretation methods: that is, in the application of legal rules, The result of plural interpretation appears in the use of literal meaning interpretation, which needs to predict the social consequences and measure the social purpose. Secondly, it analyzes the relationship between the sociological interpretation method and the legal rules. The interpretation of sociology should be based on the basic premise of legal rules, which can be adapted to the rules of law under special circumstances. Finally, it analyzes the specific application areas of the interpretation of sociology, mainly from the perspective of constitution, criminal law, The third chapter focuses on the application steps of sociological interpretation methods: first, the social effect of each interpretation is predicted and analyzed, and then the purpose of social control is determined. Social purpose is used to measure the social effect of various interpretations and to see which one is more in line with the social purpose; Then the second section of this chapter elaborates the application conditions and steps of sociological interpretation through some specific cases, such as Peng Yu case, Luzhou third Party succession case, Jia Guoyu case and so on. Chapter 4th mainly reviews the sociological interpretation. This paper mainly evaluates the necessity and limitation of sociological interpretation methods. Firstly, it analyzes the necessity of sociological interpretation methods. Secondly, it analyzes the relationship between sociological interpretation method and "unity of two effects", and discusses the limitation of sociological interpretation and how to solve it. In short, sociological interpretation is an indispensable method of legal interpretation in the judicial process. It has its own application conditions and steps, as well as some advantages and limitations. In order to achieve good social effect, social justice and social welfare can be achieved by combining with other legal interpretations.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D90-052

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 沈瑜;法律如何被理解[D];西南政法大學;2011年

2 尹偉君;論民事審判中的社會學解釋[D];蘇州大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1493559