本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治化進(jìn)程中的主體問題研究　出處：《四川社會科學(xué)院》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任 法治化進(jìn)程 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任主體

【摘要】： 企業(yè)社會責(zé)任自發(fā)展至今,已由最初的出于平衡社會主體權(quán)益的企業(yè)經(jīng)營理念發(fā)展成為國際企業(yè)通行的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并成為當(dāng)今企業(yè)管理、社會學(xué)、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和法學(xué)界共同關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)問題。隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷深化和經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化態(tài)勢的加強(qiáng),尤其在加入世界貿(mào)易組織以來,國際商貿(mào)合作活動越趨頻繁,企業(yè)社會責(zé)任所包含的關(guān)注社會、關(guān)注環(huán)境、關(guān)注消費(fèi)者的精神和我國所倡導(dǎo)的以人為本理念、科學(xué)發(fā)展觀是一致的,因此決定了企業(yè)社會責(zé)任在我國的建設(shè)有良好的理論基礎(chǔ)和實(shí)踐可能。同時(shí),我國在參與國際性商事活動的過程中,還受到國際性商事規(guī)則與法律的約束,這更提出了我國進(jìn)行企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治建設(shè)的自身要求。 我國進(jìn)行企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治化建設(shè)的首要任務(wù)是認(rèn)清什么是企業(yè)社會責(zé)任,企業(yè)社會責(zé)任在我國的實(shí)踐具有什么樣的特殊性,并且通過法律制度的先行建設(shè)為企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治的推行提供現(xiàn)實(shí)保障。法治建設(shè)離不開法律制度體系的建立,而法律制度建設(shè)以明確權(quán)利主體、義務(wù)主體為第一步,其次才能確立主體的權(quán)利義務(wù)和對法律后果的保障救濟(jì)。在我國企業(yè)社會責(zé)任的研究中,多數(shù)學(xué)者從事的是對企業(yè)社會責(zé)任正當(dāng)性研究、企業(yè)社會責(zé)任內(nèi)涵研究以及我國實(shí)現(xiàn)企業(yè)社會責(zé)任的立法模式與途徑研究等等。作者在考量企業(yè)社會責(zé)任時(shí)回歸到我國法治建設(shè)的第一步,即明確法律關(guān)系主體的問題上時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn),在這方面的研究投入和理論成果較少,而將企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法律關(guān)系中的權(quán)利主體、義務(wù)主體及監(jiān)督主體進(jìn)行比較系統(tǒng)的分類研究就更少。作者認(rèn)為,我國在加強(qiáng)企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法律制度建設(shè)時(shí)必先厘清法律關(guān)系中的主體問題,對這些主體加以區(qū)分,從而可以查缺企業(yè)社會責(zé)任某類主體的立法空白,以此為基礎(chǔ),指導(dǎo)企業(yè)社會責(zé)任立法建設(shè)和法制的完善,企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治化進(jìn)程中的主體研究無論從理論研究意義上還是現(xiàn)實(shí)立法指導(dǎo)意義上,都具有重要的作用。 本文首先從法哲學(xué)的角度切入,對比研究法制與法治的概念,指出法治建設(shè)的前提是構(gòu)建完善的法制體系,法制是法治實(shí)現(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ);其次在法治化進(jìn)程中探討社會責(zé)任的主體問題,從權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系的角度出發(fā)將社會責(zé)任主體劃分為義務(wù)主體、權(quán)利主體、監(jiān)督主體,以此更明晰在法律關(guān)系中,誰承擔(dān)責(zé)任,誰主張權(quán)利,誰監(jiān)督的問題,在此,本文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性的將權(quán)利主體、義務(wù)主體及監(jiān)督主體以不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)分為不同類別,研究各類主體在參與企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治活動的法律特征,以便引導(dǎo)以主體權(quán)利義務(wù)為內(nèi)容的法律制度構(gòu)建;文章最后,作者從主體視角對我國企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治問題進(jìn)行了再思考,提出我國現(xiàn)存缺陷并以此做出完善企業(yè)社會責(zé)任法治建設(shè)的建議。
[Abstract]:Since the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR), it has developed from the original business concept of balancing the rights and interests of social subjects to the common standard of international enterprises, and has become the current corporate management, sociology. With the deepening of China's market economy and the strengthening of economic globalization, especially since China's accession to the World Trade Organization, international trade cooperation activities have become more and more frequent. Corporate social responsibility includes concern about society, environment, and the spirit of consumers and the people-oriented concept advocated by our country. The scientific concept of development is consistent. Therefore, it is decided that the construction of corporate social responsibility in China has a good theoretical basis and practical possibility. At the same time, in the process of participating in international commercial activities, our country is also bound by international commercial rules and laws. This also puts forward our own requirements for the construction of corporate social responsibility rule of law. The primary task of our country in the legal construction of corporate social responsibility is to recognize what is corporate social responsibility and what the particularity of the practice of corporate social responsibility is in our country. And through the first construction of the legal system for corporate social responsibility to provide practical protection for the implementation of the rule of law. The rule of law can not be separated from the establishment of the legal system, and the legal system construction in order to clarify the subject of rights. The subject of obligation is the first step, then can establish the rights and obligations of the subject and safeguard relief to the legal consequences. In the study of corporate social responsibility in China, most scholars are engaged in the study of the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility. The research on the connotation of corporate social responsibility and the legislative model and ways to realize corporate social responsibility in China. The author returns to the first step of the construction of the rule of law in China when considering corporate social responsibility. That is to say, when the subject of the legal relationship is clear, we find that there is less research input and theoretical results in this area, and the subject of the right in the legal relationship of corporate social responsibility. The author thinks that when we strengthen the construction of the legal system of corporate social responsibility, we must first clarify the subject issues in the legal relationship. To distinguish these subjects, we can check the lack of a certain kind of corporate social responsibility of the main legislative gaps, as a basis to guide the corporate social responsibility legislation construction and the improvement of the legal system. The subject research in the process of the legalization of corporate social responsibility plays an important role in both the theoretical research and the practical legislative guidance. Firstly, from the angle of philosophy of law, this paper contrasts the concept of legal system and rule of law, and points out that the premise of the construction of rule of law is to build a perfect legal system, and the legal system is the basis for the realization of the rule of law. Secondly, in the process of rule of law to explore the subject of social responsibility, from the point of view of the relationship between rights and obligations, the subject of social responsibility is divided into the subject of obligation, the subject of rights, the subject of supervision, so as to be more clear in the legal relationship. Who bears the responsibility, who claims the right, who supervises the question, here, this article originally divides the rights subject, the obligation subject and the supervision subject into different categories according to the different standard. This paper studies the legal characteristics of all kinds of subjects participating in the legal activities of corporate social responsibility in order to guide the construction of legal system with the content of subject's rights and obligations. Finally, from the perspective of the subject, the author reconsiders the legal problems of corporate social responsibility in China, puts forward the existing defects in our country and makes some suggestions to perfect the construction of corporate social responsibility rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D920.4;F270

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 楊寶良;;國有企業(yè)社會責(zé)任問題探討[J];中國城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年12期

2 李偉;企業(yè)的社會契約——一個(gè)新的企業(yè)行為規(guī)范研究框架[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2003年10期

3 湯春來;公司正義的制度認(rèn)證與創(chuàng)新[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

4 徐亞文,李玲;法治的主體與主體的法治[J];法學(xué);1998年12期

5 王妍;企業(yè)社會責(zé)任及其法理學(xué)研究[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期

6 林軍;企業(yè)社會責(zé)任的社會契約理論解析[J];嶺南學(xué)刊;2004年04期

7 黎友煥;;論企業(yè)社會責(zé)任建設(shè)與構(gòu)建和諧社會[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年05期

8 陳旭東;余遜達(dá);;民營企業(yè)社會責(zé)任意識的現(xiàn)狀與評價(jià)[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

9 李淑英;;社會契約論視野中的企業(yè)社會責(zé)任[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 華中師范大學(xué)政法學(xué)院博士生 劉漢林;[N];光明日報(bào);2008年

2 高尚全;[N];學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)報(bào);2004年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳留彬;中國企業(yè)社會責(zé)任理論與實(shí)證研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1440432