本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國刑事庭審中被告人應(yīng)答語信息短缺的語用學(xué)研究　出處：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 信息短缺 應(yīng)答語 中國法庭 順應(yīng)

【摘要】： 本文從語用學(xué)角度研究中國法庭應(yīng)答語中信息不足量現(xiàn)象試圖解釋這一現(xiàn)象的順應(yīng)特征。信息短缺的法庭應(yīng)答是指應(yīng)答者未能提供發(fā)問者所期望的、必要的信息的動(dòng)態(tài)過程。 本文援用Verschueren的順應(yīng)論并在分析真實(shí)法庭語料的基礎(chǔ)上提出了分析法庭應(yīng)答中信息不足量的理論框架。作者認(rèn)為,信息不足量的法庭應(yīng)答是應(yīng)答者為了實(shí)現(xiàn)其交際目的而對各種語境因素作出順應(yīng)性選擇的動(dòng)態(tài)過程,主要涉及始發(fā)語、交際目的和語境變量(包括物理世界,社交世界和心理世界)。 信息短缺的法庭應(yīng)答語具有多樣性,主要表現(xiàn)在命題內(nèi)容的不同和信息短缺的明顯程度的不同兩方面。同時(shí),應(yīng)答者在回答時(shí)提供不足量信息不是機(jī)械的、固定不變的,而是各種語境變量相互作用的結(jié)果,因而具有順應(yīng)性。在法庭語境下,社交世界和心理世界對應(yīng)答者的語言選擇影響最大。應(yīng)答者對社交世界的順應(yīng),是其作出應(yīng)答的主要?jiǎng)恿蛘咧萍s因素。再加上應(yīng)答者對自己心理世界,和對發(fā)問者以及法庭上聽眾的心理世界的順應(yīng),就導(dǎo)致了信息短缺的應(yīng)答的產(chǎn)生。應(yīng)答者對社交世界的順應(yīng)是常為靜態(tài)的。而應(yīng)答者對過于強(qiáng)烈的心里動(dòng)機(jī)等的順應(yīng),或者對聽眾心理的錯(cuò)誤評估都可能造成效果并不理想的順應(yīng)情況。這種情況并未否定法庭上應(yīng)答的順應(yīng)性,反而更好的印證了應(yīng)答者一直努力對各種世界作出順應(yīng)。 我們相信,論文建立的理論框架可用于研究其他語境(警察詢問、檢察官提審)中的應(yīng)答語信息短缺現(xiàn)象。論文中所分析的應(yīng)答語信息短缺的語言策略及其語用功能,對公訴人提高語用意識,改進(jìn)提問獲取有用信息的策略方面有一定的啟發(fā)。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of pragmatics, this paper attempts to explain the adaptation characteristics of the phenomenon of insufficient information in Chinese court response, which refers to the respondent's failure to provide the questioner's expectations. The dynamic process of necessary information. Based on Verschueren's adaptation theory and the analysis of real forensic corpus, this paper proposes a theoretical framework for analyzing the insufficient amount of information in court response. Insufficiently informed court response is a dynamic process in which respondents make adaptive choices to various contextual factors in order to achieve their communicative purposes, mainly involving the source language, communicative purpose and contextual variables (including the physical world). The social world and the mental world. Lack of information in court response language has diversity, mainly in two aspects: the content of proposition and the obvious degree of information shortage. At the same time, it is not mechanical for respondents to provide insufficient information. Fixed, but the result of the interaction of various contextual variables, so it has adaptability. In the context of the court. The social world and the psychological world have the greatest influence on the language choice of the respondents. The adaptation of the respondents to the social world is the main motive force or restriction factor of their responses. And the psychological world of the questioner and the audience in court. The adaptation of respondents to the social world is often static, and the respondents to too strong psychological motivation and so on. Or the wrong assessment of the audience psychology may result in unsatisfactory compliance, which does not negate the compliance of the response in court. Instead, it is better evidence that respondents have been trying to adapt to the world. We believe that the theoretical framework established in this paper can be used to study other contexts (police interrogations). The lack of information in response language in the public prosecutor's arraignment. The language strategies and pragmatic functions of the information shortage in response language are analyzed in this paper, and the pragmatic awareness of the public prosecutor is enhanced. Improving the strategy of asking questions for useful information is instructive.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D90-055;H13

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 夏丹;中國民事審判話語敘事研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1434861