本文關(guān)鍵詞：美國反傾銷日落復(fù)審機(jī)制研究　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 日落復(fù)審 傾銷可能性裁定 損害可能性裁定

【摘要】： 日落復(fù)審作為反傾銷調(diào)查的一項(xiàng)后續(xù)程序,其設(shè)立目的是為了在反傾銷措施實(shí)施一段時(shí)間之后,審查繼續(xù)實(shí)施反傾銷措施的合理性和必要性。因此,日落復(fù)審的結(jié)果關(guān)系到已經(jīng)實(shí)施的反傾銷措施能否如期終止。 美國是世界上反傾銷日落復(fù)審機(jī)制較為完善的國家之一,同時(shí)也是世界上對華反傾銷最多的國家之一。因此,研究其反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度,對在該國市場飽受反傾銷措施之苦的我國生產(chǎn)商和出口商具有重要意義。目前,國內(nèi)對反傾銷的研究已經(jīng)比較深入,但專門針對反傾銷中日落復(fù)審問題的研究還很少。 本文從美國反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的演進(jìn)和確立入手,主要分析美國商務(wù)部和國際貿(mào)易委員會(huì)在日落復(fù)審程序中,作出可能性裁定時(shí)需遵循的實(shí)體規(guī)則。通過該分析,以期對我國反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的完善以及主管機(jī)關(guān)的實(shí)踐有所幫助。 在結(jié)構(gòu)上,本文分為前言、正文和結(jié)論三個(gè)部分。其中,作為文章主體的正文部分,又分為四章。 前言部分交代了選題的背景、意義和寫作目的。 第一章美國反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度概述,是對美國該制度的總體介紹。本章首先簡單介紹WTO的日落復(fù)審制度,通過回顧日落復(fù)審條款的演進(jìn)歷程,闡明了該條款的目的和宗旨。然后對美國現(xiàn)有的反傾銷成文法和法規(guī)進(jìn)行概括,厘清其反傾銷日落復(fù)審法律體系。 第二章美國反傾銷日落復(fù)審實(shí)體規(guī)則研究,是本文的重點(diǎn)。該章結(jié)合以美國為被申訴方的三起案件的WTO上訴機(jī)構(gòu)報(bào)告,分美國商務(wù)部和國際貿(mào)易委員會(huì)兩條主線,分別分析了兩主管機(jī)關(guān)在日落復(fù)審程序中作出可能性裁定時(shí)需要遵循的實(shí)體規(guī)則以及在實(shí)踐中如何運(yùn)用這些規(guī)則,主要是裁定的考慮因素以及考慮“其他因素”的條件。本章對兩主管機(jī)關(guān)在日落復(fù)審中一些有爭議的規(guī)定和做法進(jìn)行重點(diǎn)分析,包括傾銷幅度的確定、國內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)的脆弱性、累積評估在日落復(fù)審程序中適用的合理性等。 第三章對美國反傾銷日落復(fù)審可能性裁定的救濟(jì)。本章指出了對不合理的可能性裁定可以采取的救濟(jì)手段,可以到國際貿(mào)易法院進(jìn)行起訴,請求司法審查,也可以直接訴諸WTO爭端解決機(jī)制。利害關(guān)系方也可以同時(shí)采用兩種手段。 第四章中國反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度的完善。本章首先對我國現(xiàn)有的關(guān)于日落復(fù)審的規(guī)定進(jìn)行梳理,并介紹了我國對外的第一起日落復(fù)審案,從而得出我國現(xiàn)有日落復(fù)審制度的不足——缺乏具體的有法律效力的法律規(guī)則的指導(dǎo),在對外效力上存在缺陷。通過前文對美國日落復(fù)審制度的分析,本文借鑒其成熟經(jīng)驗(yàn)及立法技巧,對我國日落復(fù)審制度的完善提出四點(diǎn)建議。 結(jié)論部分對本文觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行總結(jié)。一方面肯定了美國日落復(fù)審制度完善的體系和完備的內(nèi)容,另一方面也指出該制度所具有的貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義色彩。因此,在借鑒該制度時(shí)要取其精華、棄其糟粕,學(xué)習(xí)其先進(jìn)的立法技巧,吸納其合理的規(guī)定,而不能盲目崇拜,照抄照搬。
[Abstract]:A follow-up program as the sunset review of anti-dumping investigation, the purpose of its establishment is to implement a period of time in the anti-dumping measures, rationality and necessity continue to review the implementation of the anti-dumping measures. Therefore, the relationship between the sunset review results to the implementation of the anti-dumping measures will expire on schedule.
The United States is one of the sunset review mechanism is perfect anti dumping law in the world, is also one of the world's anti-dumping in most countries. Therefore, the study of anti-dumping sunset review system, has important significance for suffering from anti-dumping measures from the market in the country of China's manufacturers and exporters. At present, the domestic study on anti dumping has been more in-depth, but specifically for the study of anti-dumping sunset review are rare.
In this paper, the evolution from the United States anti-dumping sunset review system and the establishment of the main analysis of the U.S. Department of Commerce and International Trade Commission in the sunset review procedures, make the possibility of ruling substantive rules should follow. Through the analysis, in order to improve China's anti dumping review system and the practice of competent authorities for help.
In structure, this article is divided into three parts: preface, text and conclusion, which are divided into four chapters as the body part of the main body of the article.
The preface explains the background, significance and purpose of the topic.
The first chapter outlines the United States anti-dumping sunset review system, the system of the United States is a general introduction. This chapter firstly introduces WTO's sunset review system, through reviewing the evolution course of the sunset clause, to clarify the terms of aim and purpose. Then the existing U.S. antidumping statutes and regulations are summarized, clarify the sunset review of anti dumping legal system.
The second chapter of the United States anti-dumping sunset review rules of the entity, is the focus of this paper. This chapter combined with the United States to report the WTO appellate body by three cases in which the complainant, the United States Department of Commerce and international trade commission two lines are analyzed respectively. Two the authorities in the sunset review procedures to make substantive rules to follow the possibility of ruling and in practice how to use these rules, the main factor is that, considering the "other factors". This chapter of the two authorities of some controversial provisions and practices in the sunset review focuses on the analysis, including the determination of dumping margin, the vulnerability of the domestic industry, the cumulative assessment application in the sunset review procedures of rationality.
The third chapter on the possibility of relief ruled the United States anti-dumping sunset review. This chapter points out that can be taken to remedy the possibility of unreasonable, can be prosecuted to the court of international trade, a request for judicial review, can also go directly to the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. An interested party can use two kinds of means.
The fourth chapter is the improvement Chinese anti-dumping sunset review system. The first chapter of the provisions on the sunset review of the current review, and introduces China's first sunset review, so as to get the guidance of China's existing sunset review system of the deficiency of the lack of specific legal rules, legal effect, existence the defects in the external effect. Through the analysis of the sunset review system, referring to the mature experience and legislative techniques, puts forward four suggestions on Perfecting China's sunset review system.
The conclusion part summarizes this view. On the one hand that the sunset review system to improve the system and complete the contents, on the other hand also pointed out that trade protectionism is the system. Therefore, in reference to the system to take the essence and discard the dross, learn the advanced legislative skills, absorb the reasonable regulations, but not blindly worship, copy.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：DD912.29;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張斌,戈松;美國反傾銷日落復(fù)審制度研究[J];東華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

2 張 斌 ,張 煒;中國企業(yè)應(yīng)對美國反傾銷日落復(fù)審的現(xiàn)狀和策略[J];上海企業(yè);2001年09期

，

本文編號：1433514