本文關(guān)鍵詞：徐愷訴上海寶鋼冶金建設(shè)公司名譽(yù)權(quán)糾紛案法律分析　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 退工單 記載不實(shí) 勞動(dòng)爭(zhēng)議 名譽(yù)權(quán) 訴訟策略

【摘要】：退工單記載不實(shí)極易引起勞動(dòng)者和用人單位之間的爭(zhēng)議。以徐愷訴上海寶鋼案為典型的案例即反映了退工單記載不實(shí)對(duì)勞動(dòng)者后續(xù)就業(yè)所產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面影響。退工單在性質(zhì)上是勞動(dòng)合同解除或終止的證明,由用人單位出具,能夠在勞動(dòng)關(guān)系管理中起到一定的作用。退工單記載不實(shí)所導(dǎo)致的法律糾紛既可以作為勞動(dòng)糾紛案件處理,也可以作為名譽(yù)權(quán)糾紛案件來(lái)處理,但是不同的訴訟策略選擇會(huì)產(chǎn)生不同的后果。本文以徐愷訴上海寶鋼案為分析切入,探討該案背后存在的實(shí)體法問(wèn)題和訴訟策略問(wèn)題,主要分為如下五個(gè)部分：第一部分是引言。引言部分交代了退工單記載不實(shí)爭(zhēng)議這一法律現(xiàn)象,作為本文研究的背景,并簡(jiǎn)要地交代了本文的研究目的、研究路徑和研究方法,作為全文研究工作的起點(diǎn)；第二部分是徐愷訴上海寶鋼案的基本案情及爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn),在陳述徐愷訴上海寶鋼案基本案情、訴訟請(qǐng)求和抗辯理由、裁判結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上,整理出該案中的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)和裁判分歧,并對(duì)該案所反映的核心問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了總結(jié),認(rèn)為該案所反映的是退工單記載不實(shí)爭(zhēng)議產(chǎn)生后的訴訟策略選擇問(wèn)題：第三部分是本案爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)的法律分析。本部分對(duì)退工單的概念、性質(zhì)和作用進(jìn)行了分析,并反思了退工單記載不實(shí)爭(zhēng)議案件產(chǎn)生的原因,分析了退工單記載不實(shí)案件背后存在的勞資關(guān)系失衡；第四部分是本案反映的法律問(wèn)題,提出徐愷訴上海寶鋼案以名譽(yù)權(quán)糾紛而不是勞動(dòng)糾紛展開訴訟反映了訴訟策略選擇上的優(yōu)化,原因在于該案以名譽(yù)權(quán)糾紛案件處理更有利于保護(hù)勞動(dòng)者的合法權(quán)益；第五部分是退工單記載不實(shí)糾紛案件的司法應(yīng)對(duì),主要以司法裁判者的視角審視退工單記載不實(shí)所致的名譽(yù)權(quán)糾紛案件在處理中方法和技巧,尤其對(duì)注重此類案件的事實(shí)認(rèn)定、證據(jù)認(rèn)定、裁判理由陳述和損害賠償數(shù)額確定予以重點(diǎn)關(guān)注。
[Abstract]:The case of Xukai v. Shanghai Baosteel reflects the negative influence of false record on the subsequent employment of the laborer. Only in nature is the labor contract termination or termination of proof. Issued by the unit of choose and employ persons, can play a certain role in the management of labor relations. It can also be dealt with as a reputation dispute case, but different litigation strategies will have different consequences. This article takes Xukai v. Shanghai Baosteel case as the analysis. This paper discusses the substantive law problems and litigation strategies behind the case, mainly divided into the following five parts: the first part is the introduction. As the background of this paper, and briefly explained the purpose of this study, research path and research methods, as the starting point of the full text research work; The second part is the basic case of Xukai v. Shanghai Baosteel and the focus of the dispute, on the basis of the presentation of the basic case of Xukai v. Shanghai Baosteel, litigation request and defense, the results of the judgment. Collate the dispute focus and judgment differences in the case, and the core issues reflected in the case are summarized. It is considered that this case reflects the choice of litigation strategy after the false dispute of withdrawal form is recorded: the third part is the legal analysis of the focus of the dispute in this case. This part analyzes the concept, nature and function of the withdrawal order. It also reflects on the reasons of the case of false dispute, and analyzes the imbalance of labor relations behind the record of false record. The 4th part is the legal problem reflected in this case, and the litigation in the case of Xukai v. Shanghai Baosteel reflects the optimization of the choice of litigation strategy by the right of reputation dispute rather than the labor dispute. The reason lies in the fact that it is more advantageous to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the laborer to deal with the dispute case of reputation right in this case; The 5th part is the judicial response to the false dispute cases recorded by the withdrawal orders, mainly from the perspective of the judicial adjudicators to examine the methods and techniques in the handling of reputation disputes caused by the false record of the withdrawal orders. Especially focus on the facts of such cases, evidence, the statement of reasons and damages to determine the amount of focus.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 閆治國(guó);丁華;;論用人單位單方即時(shí)解除權(quán)——《勞動(dòng)合同法》第三十九條評(píng)析[J];安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

2 趙靖;;私權(quán)保護(hù)的民法分析[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

3 韓桂君;;《勞動(dòng)合同法》制度創(chuàng)新及其理論基礎(chǔ)研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)政法資訊;2008年05期

4 洪波;李軼;;公眾人物的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、類型及其名譽(yù)權(quán)的限制——以媒體侵害公眾人物名譽(yù)權(quán)為中心[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年04期

5 竺效;“社會(huì)法”概念考析——兼議我國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于社會(huì)法語(yǔ)詞之使用[J];法律適用;2004年03期

6 林嘉;;論社會(huì)保障法的社會(huì)法本質(zhì)——兼論勞動(dòng)法與社會(huì)保障法的關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)家;2002年01期

7 司春燕;;論官員名譽(yù)權(quán)糾紛及其解決途徑[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年12期

8 劉瑩;;公眾人物名譽(yù)權(quán)的限制與保護(hù)[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年34期

9 竇衍瑞;新聞權(quán)與公眾人物名譽(yù)權(quán)的沖突與救濟(jì)[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

10 吳振華;;刑案中增加精神損害賠償之探析[J];福建法學(xué);2012年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1415327