本文關(guān)鍵詞：改革開放視域下國企在德并購法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 海外并購 國安審查 卡特爾審查 勞動(dòng)保護(hù)

【摘要】：馬克思主義法學(xué)詮釋了人類社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)和上層建筑之間的關(guān)系：“法的關(guān)系正像國家的形式一樣,即不能從它們本身來理解,也不能從所謂人類精神的一般發(fā)展來理解,相反,它們根源于物質(zhì)的生活關(guān)系�！奔唇�(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)決定上層建筑,上層建筑反作用于經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)這一客觀事實(shí)。 改革開放以來,中國企業(yè)在海外的并購越來越頻繁正是因?yàn)榻?jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)的快速提高所導(dǎo)致的,具有社會(huì)發(fā)展的必然性。而決定海外并購成功的首要原因則在于對相關(guān)法律的研究和并購風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的防范控制,因此把并購相關(guān)國法律和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范這一問題作為課題研究方向就具有很強(qiáng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 本文以德國的并購相關(guān)法律以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范措施為著力點(diǎn),緊扣德國法律與中國企業(yè)兩者之間的關(guān)系,運(yùn)用歷史研究法和邏輯研究法,對中國企業(yè)在德國將會(huì)遇到的三大法律問題：國安審查法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、卡特爾審查法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、勞動(dòng)保護(hù)法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)做重點(diǎn)梳理和研究,并總結(jié)出一些應(yīng)對方法。 在防范德國國安審查法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)上要結(jié)合實(shí)際采取適當(dāng)?shù)耐顿Y策略來淡化“國有”風(fēng)險(xiǎn)；尋找有力的合作伙伴,組建合理的團(tuán)隊(duì)來實(shí)施并購行為;做好輿論宣傳工作,樹立良好的本十形象。在防范卡特爾風(fēng)險(xiǎn)上必須把德國卡特爾制度理解到位,針對不同行業(yè)的審查采取不同的收購策略,做到強(qiáng)調(diào)雙贏,適度突出德國利益,保證收購成功。在防范勞動(dòng)保護(hù)法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)上,中國企業(yè)一定要改變在國內(nèi)的固有思維,協(xié)調(diào)好勞資關(guān)系,建立健全監(jiān)督機(jī)制,降低運(yùn)行成本。
[Abstract]:Marx's law interpretation of the relationship between social economic foundation and superstructure: "the relationship between law as forms of the state that can not be understood from their own, nor from the general development of the human spirit to understand, on the contrary, they are rooted in the relation of material life." that is, the economic base determines the superstructure. The reaction of the superstructure on the fact that the economic basis.
Since the reform and opening up, China enterprises in overseas mergers and acquisitions more frequently because of the economic base of the rapid increase in lead, with the necessity of social development. And prevention control of overseas mergers and acquisitions is the primary reason for success of the relevant legal research and acquisition risk, so the acquisition of the relevant laws of the country and risk prevention this problem as the research direction has a strong practical significance.
Based on the German law and merger related risk prevention measures as the focal point, the relationship between the German law and Chinese enterprises closely, using historical method and logical research method, the Chinese enterprises in the three major legal issues of Germany will be met: National Security Review of legal risk, legal risk review cartel, focus on and study labor protection legal risk, and summarizes some methods to deal with.
In the prevention of legal risks on the German national security review must be practical to take appropriate investment strategies to dilute the "state-owned" risk; looking for a strong partner, the formation of a reasonable team to carry out mergers and acquisitions; do the propaganda work, establish a good image of the ten. In the prevention of the risk of the German cartel cartel must understand the system in place, take different acquisition strategies for different industry review, do emphasize win-win, moderately prominent German interests, to ensure the successful acquisition. In the prevention of legal risks of labor protection, Chinese enterprises must change the inherent thinking in China, coordinate labor relations, establish and improve the supervision mechanism, reduce operating costs.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D951.6;D922.295

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林潔;;“走出去”戰(zhàn)略:我國企業(yè)海外投資現(xiàn)狀與思考[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年14期

2 成善德;;海外并購:中國企業(yè)如何應(yīng)對美歐的反壟斷挑戰(zhàn)[J];商業(yè)研究;2009年10期

3 徐芳;;海外并購的額外法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其對策——由“中海油并購優(yōu)尼科案”引發(fā)的思考[J];法商研究;2006年05期

4 林燕平;反壟斷法中的適用除外制度比較[J];法學(xué);1997年11期

5 王中華;企業(yè)跨國并購過程中的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2001年04期

6 沈會(huì);;淺析實(shí)施海外并購的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];才智;2012年30期

7 王健;;德國競爭法的歐洲化改革——《反限制競爭法》第7次修訂述評[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2006年06期

8 金福海;戚軍偉;;反壟斷法適用除外制度比較研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)法論壇;2009年00期

9 于桂琴;;中國企業(yè)跨國并購政治、法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析與防范對策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)界;2008年02期

10 邵建東;;德國新修訂的《反限制競爭法》介評[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2000年01期

，

本文編號：1368865