本文選題：社會存在 + 意識�。� 參考：《哲學(xué)動態(tài)》2017年05期

【摘要】：在馬克思關(guān)于社會存在與意識關(guān)系論斷的解讀上,"決定論"解讀過分強化了其科學(xué)化和因果必然性的向度,從而把它與個人自由相對立。傳統(tǒng)教科書中流行的"決定(作用)和反作用"理解模式,無法擺脫決定論解讀的嫌疑。"規(guī)定論"解讀借助德國觀念論傳統(tǒng)尤其是黑格爾邏輯學(xué)的思想資源,對決定(bestimmen)的意義進(jìn)行重新界定,以中性化的立場把因果關(guān)系轉(zhuǎn)換為條件關(guān)系,破除了"決定論"解讀中的線性決定關(guān)系理解模式,為個人在歷史的創(chuàng)造過程中發(fā)揮能動性留下了位置。但其對語義和邏輯分析的過分倚重,與馬克思的社會批判進(jìn)路顯然存在著較大差距。因此,我們應(yīng)以強調(diào)諸因素間相互作用的"制約論"解讀模式去理解。
[Abstract]:In Marx's interpretation of the relationship between social existence and consciousness, the interpretation of "determinism" overintensifies the direction of its scientific and causal inevitability, thus contrasting it with individual freedom. The popular "decision" and "reaction" mode of understanding in traditional textbooks cannot get rid of the suspicion of deterministic interpretation. The prescriptive theory "redefines the meaning of decision bestimmenon with the help of the tradition of German concept theory, especially the ideological resources of Hegel's logic, and converts causality into conditional relationship with a neutral position." Breaking out the understanding model of linear deterministic relationship in the interpretation of determinism, it leaves a place for individuals to play a dynamic role in the process of historical creation. However, its over-reliance on semantic and logical analysis is obviously different from Marx's approach to social criticism. Therefore, we should interpret the theory of restriction by emphasizing the interaction of various factors.
【作者單位】： 深圳大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金重大項目“馬克思主義與當(dāng)代社會政治哲學(xué)發(fā)展趨勢”(12&ZD106) 深圳大學(xué)高水平大學(xué)建設(shè)“馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育專項資助項目”(16MSZX13)的階段性成果
【分類號】：B036
，

本文編號：2021683