本文關(guān)鍵詞： 多節(jié)段脊髓型頸椎病 頸椎后路 Centerpiece鈦板 非融合固定　出處：《中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志》2016年11期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的探討Centerpiece鈦板在多節(jié)段脊髓型頸椎病后路非融合固定技術(shù)中的應(yīng)用。方法回顧性分析自2008-01—2013-10診治的多節(jié)段(3節(jié)或3節(jié)以上)脊髓型頸椎病82例,22例行單開(kāi)門(mén)絲線(xiàn)懸吊椎管擴(kuò)大成形術(shù)(絲線(xiàn)組),27例行單開(kāi)門(mén)絲線(xiàn)懸吊椎管擴(kuò)大成形加側(cè)塊螺釘固定(釘棒組),33例行單開(kāi)門(mén)Centerpiece鈦板固定椎管擴(kuò)大成形術(shù)(鈦板組)。結(jié)果與釘棒組比,絲線(xiàn)組與鈦板組手術(shù)時(shí)間更短、術(shù)中出血量更少、住院時(shí)間更短,術(shù)后1年頸椎活動(dòng)度、頸椎曲率指數(shù)更優(yōu),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.001);但絲線(xiàn)組與鈦板組手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量、住院時(shí)間、頸椎活動(dòng)度、頸椎曲率指數(shù)比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。術(shù)后1年鈦板組最窄椎管面積、JOA評(píng)分優(yōu)于絲線(xiàn)組與釘棒組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.001);但絲線(xiàn)組與釘棒組最窄椎管面積、JOA評(píng)分比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論頸椎后路非融合技術(shù)治療多節(jié)段脊髓型頸椎病的方法有很多,但采用Centerpiece鈦板行后路單開(kāi)門(mén)固定手術(shù)效果較好,并發(fā)癥較少。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the application of Centerpiece titanium plate in posterior non-fusion fixation of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy. Methods A retrospective analysis of 82 cases of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy with single open door filaments was performed in 82 patients with cervical Spondylotic myelopathy treated from 2008-01-2013-10. Extended laminoplasty for suspended spinal canal (27 cases in the silk thread group were treated with single open wire suspension spinal canal forming plus lateral mass screw fixation (33 cases in the nail rod group) and 33 cases in the single open door Centerpiece titanium plate fixation group (titanium plate group). The results were compared with those in the nail rod group. The operation time of silk thread group and titanium plate group was shorter, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was less, the hospitalization time was shorter, the cervical movement and curvature index of cervical vertebra were better in one year after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.001), but the operation time of silk thread group and titanium plate group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, There was no significant difference in hospitalization time, cervical movement and cervical curvature index (P 0.05). The JOA score of the narrowest spinal canal area in the titanium plate group was better than that in the wire group and the screw rod group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.001), but there was no significant difference in JOA score between the silk thread group and the nail rod group. Conclusion there are many methods for the treatment of multilevel cervical Spondylotic myelopathy by the posterior cervical spine non-fusion technique. But Centerpiece titanium plate was used for single door fixation, and the complications were less.
【作者單位】： 壽光市人民醫(yī)院脊柱外科;
【基金】：濰坊市衛(wèi)生局科研項(xiàng)目(2014年第140號(hào))
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R687.32

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫建民,張佐倫,蔣振松,王松剛;頸椎后路加前路巨大骨化物切除減壓術(shù)[J];脊柱外科雜志;2004年02期

2 張艷平;王蕊;王蓉;;頸椎后路術(shù)后患者側(cè)臥位的可行性探討[J];護(hù)理學(xué)雜志;2010年24期

3 史艷萍;米偉;;頸椎后路術(shù)中發(fā)生心跳驟停6例分析[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2009年05期

4 苗潔;申勇;王林峰;李冠軍;葛志強(qiáng);仝超;步振英;;頸椎后路三種手術(shù)方式對(duì)改善多節(jié)段頸椎病生理曲度及療效的遠(yuǎn)期觀察[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2012年11期

5 陳海瑞;;頸椎后路術(shù)的解剖與臨床[J];大家健康(學(xué)術(shù)版);2014年14期

6 張學(xué)忠,張東林;頸椎后路保留韌帶復(fù)合體單開(kāi)門(mén)椎管擴(kuò)大成形術(shù)的臨床應(yīng)用[J];錦州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

7 蘇洪民;房清敏;;頸椎后路術(shù)后并發(fā)癥研究進(jìn)展[J];濱州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

8 董雙海;田紀(jì)偉;王雷;夏天;趙慶華;;可吸收醫(yī)用脊柱膜應(yīng)用頸椎后路減壓17例[J];中國(guó)組織工程研究與臨床康復(fù);2008年45期

9 余進(jìn)偉;陳長(zhǎng)青;邵艷;陳旭;郭強(qiáng);許風(fēng)娥;;頸椎后路固定鈦板在頸椎管單開(kāi)門(mén)擴(kuò)大成形術(shù)的臨床應(yīng)用[J];頸腰痛雜志;2008年05期

10 楊華;控制性降壓用于頸椎后路減壓術(shù)中減少出血的觀察[J];青島醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生;2002年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前8條

1 張鳳山;孫宇;潘勝發(fā);;頸椎后路再手術(shù)[A];中國(guó)康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十一次全國(guó)頸椎病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2009年

2 劉觀q，

本文編號(hào)：1551456