妊娠期不同分級急性胰腺炎患者的臨床特點及預(yù)后分析
發(fā)布時間:2019-01-10 19:14
【摘要】:目的探討妊娠期不同分級急性胰腺炎(AP)患者的臨床特點及預(yù)后。方法選取2005年1月—2014年12月廈門大學(xué)附屬福州第二醫(yī)院收治的妊娠期AP患者38例,根據(jù)2012年亞特蘭大AP標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和2013年版《中國急性胰腺炎診治指南》AP分級診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)分為輕度AP(MAP)組17例、中度AP(MSAP)組13例和重度AP(SAP)組8例,對比3組患者的年齡、發(fā)病時間、發(fā)病原因、誤診率、急性生理功能和慢性健康狀況評分系統(tǒng)Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ評分)、局部并發(fā)癥、器官功能衰竭和母兒病死率情況。結(jié)果 3組患者年齡、發(fā)病時間、發(fā)病原因、誤診率比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。MAP組、MSAP組、SAP組患者APACHEⅡ評分分別為(6.3±2.0)分、(9.0±2.6)分、(12.1±3.2)分,其中MSAP組和SAP組患者APACHEⅡ評分高于MAP組,SAP組患者APACHEⅡ評分高于MSAP組(P0.05)。MAP組患者無局部并發(fā)癥;MSAP組發(fā)生急性胰周液體積聚10例、胰腺假性囊腫2例、急性壞死物積聚1例;SAP組發(fā)生急性壞死物積聚4例、急性胰周液體積聚2例、胰腺假性囊腫1例、包裹性壞死1例。MAP組患者未發(fā)生器官功能衰竭,MSAP組患者發(fā)生器官功能衰竭4例(30.8%),SAP組患者發(fā)生器官功能衰竭8例(100.0%)。MAP組、MSAP組和SAP組終止妊娠例數(shù)分別為5例、3例和7例,均采用剖宮產(chǎn)方式。MAP組和MSAP組均未發(fā)生孕產(chǎn)婦和胎兒死亡。SAP組出現(xiàn)1例孕產(chǎn)婦死亡,死因為多器官功能衰竭伴嚴(yán)重腹腔感染;3例胎兒死亡,其中1例為母兒死亡,1例為入院時胎兒已死亡,另1例剖宮產(chǎn)終止妊娠后死亡。結(jié)論妊娠期AP多發(fā)生于妊娠中晚期,病因以膽囊結(jié)石和高三酰甘油血癥為主,臨床容易誤診。妊娠期MAP無局部并發(fā)癥和器官功能衰竭,預(yù)后好。妊娠期MSAP所伴局部并發(fā)癥以急性胰周液體積聚為主,或可出現(xiàn)一過性器官功能衰竭,但以單器官功能衰竭為主,經(jīng)積極治療處理后,預(yù)后較好。妊娠期SAP以急性壞死物積聚局部并發(fā)癥和持續(xù)性多器官功能衰竭為主,母兒病死率較高,是救治的重點和難點。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of (AP) patients with different grades of acute pancreatitis during pregnancy. Methods from January 2005 to December 2014, 38 AP patients with pregnancy were treated in Fuzhou second Hospital affiliated to Xiamen University. According to the Atlanta 2012 AP criteria and the 2013 Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Acute pancreatitis, they were divided into mild AP (MAP) group (n = 17), moderate AP (MSAP) group (n = 13) and severe AP (SAP) group (n = 8). Time, cause, misdiagnosis rate, acute physiological function and chronic health status scoring system 鈪,
本文編號:2406694
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of (AP) patients with different grades of acute pancreatitis during pregnancy. Methods from January 2005 to December 2014, 38 AP patients with pregnancy were treated in Fuzhou second Hospital affiliated to Xiamen University. According to the Atlanta 2012 AP criteria and the 2013 Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Acute pancreatitis, they were divided into mild AP (MAP) group (n = 17), moderate AP (MSAP) group (n = 13) and severe AP (SAP) group (n = 8). Time, cause, misdiagnosis rate, acute physiological function and chronic health status scoring system 鈪,
本文編號:2406694
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2406694.html
最近更新
教材專著