【摘要】：目的探討B(tài)超引導(dǎo)陰部神經(jīng)阻滯(pudendal nerve block,PNB)與傳統(tǒng)陰部神經(jīng)阻滯治療女性陰部神經(jīng)痛的療效。方法回顧性分析2012年11月~2016年8月在我院就診并接受陰部神經(jīng)阻滯的40例陰部神經(jīng)痛的資料,其中19例行B超引導(dǎo)下陰部神經(jīng)阻滯(B超組),21例行傳統(tǒng)陰部神經(jīng)阻滯(傳統(tǒng)組)。根據(jù)疼痛緩解情況進(jìn)行1~3次神經(jīng)阻滯。治療前、第一次治療后24 h和治療結(jié)束3個(gè)月采用視覺(jué)模擬評(píng)分(visual analog scale,VAS)評(píng)估疼痛情況。結(jié)果 2組第一次治療后24 h、治療結(jié)束后3個(gè)月的疼痛VAS均顯著低于治療前(P=0.000),B超組治療后24 h疼痛VAS較傳統(tǒng)組更低(Z=-2.451,P=0.014),治療后3個(gè)月2組無(wú)顯著性差異(Z=-0.542,P=0.588)。主要不良反應(yīng)及并發(fā)癥:臀部及下肢麻木在B超組為31.6%(6/19),傳統(tǒng)組為0(0/21),二者差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Fisher檢驗(yàn),P=0.007);頭暈在B超組為5.3%(1/19),傳統(tǒng)組為38.1%(8/21),二者差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ~2=4.427,P=0.035)。結(jié)論 B超引導(dǎo)與傳統(tǒng)手法陰部神經(jīng)阻滯治療女性陰部神經(jīng)痛均有效,2組在治療結(jié)束后3個(gè)月疼痛治療效果無(wú)顯著差異。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of B-ultrasound guided pudendal nerve block (pudendal nerve block,PNB) and traditional pudendal nerve block on female pudendal neuralgia. Methods the data of 40 cases of pudendal neuralgia treated in our hospital from November 2012 to August 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 19 cases were treated with B-ultrasound guided pudendal nerve block (B-ultrasound group) and 21 cases were treated with traditional pudendal nerve block (traditional group). According to the pain relief, 1 and 3 times of nerve block were performed. Before treatment, 24 hours after the first treatment and 3 months after treatment, the pain was assessed by visual analogue score (visual analog scale,VAS). Results the VAS of group B was significantly lower than that of group B at 24 h after the first treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment (P0. 000). The VAS of group B was lower than that of the traditional group at 24 h after the first treatment (ZP0. 451P0. 014), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 3 months after treatment (Z-0. 542P0. 588). The main adverse reactions and complications were: hip and lower extremity numbness was 31.6% (6 / 19) in B ultrasonic group and 0 / 21 (0 / 21) in traditional group, the difference was statistically significant (Fisher test P0. 007), dizziness was 5. 3% (1 / 19) in B ultrasonic group and 38. 1% (8 / 21) in traditional group (蠂 2 4. 427 P 0. 035). Conclusion there is no significant difference between the two groups in the treatment of female pudendal neuralgia under the guidance of B-ultrasound and traditional manipulation of pudendal nerve block in 3 months after treatment.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)第三醫(yī)院婦產(chǎn)科;北京大學(xué)第三醫(yī)院疼痛科;北京大學(xué)第三醫(yī)院超聲科;
【分類號(hào)】：R711

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮星瑋;丁燕琴;;雙側(cè)陰部神經(jīng)阻滯在陰道分娩中的應(yīng)用及其對(duì)母嬰的影響[J];醫(yī)學(xué)信息;2009年08期

2 董相蘭,范麗梅,張馨;雙側(cè)陰部神經(jīng)阻滯及局部浸潤(rùn)麻醉1560例臨床對(duì)比觀察[J];吉林醫(yī)學(xué);1999年01期

3 蘭香;周勤燕;黎萍;徐慧敏;傅向紅;邵雪泉;;雙側(cè)陰部神經(jīng)阻滯加局部浸潤(rùn)麻醉用于陰道分娩鎮(zhèn)痛的研究[J];中國(guó)婦幼保健;2009年07期

4 紀(jì)烈辰;俞林;;陰部神經(jīng)阻滯在痔手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];結(jié)直腸肛門(mén)外科;2011年04期

5 王濤;羅曼;陳碩;李玉瑋;;陰部神經(jīng)阻滯用于混合痔術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛的臨床觀察[J];中華結(jié)直腸疾病電子雜志;2014年02期

6 李靜輝,穆禹;陰部神經(jīng)阻滯減少軟產(chǎn)道損傷的效果觀察[J];現(xiàn)代中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志;2002年17期

7 王志勇;孫留生;劉素萍;;骶管麻醉與陰部神經(jīng)阻滯在肛腸科的臨床應(yīng)用比較[J];中國(guó)社區(qū)醫(yī)師(醫(yī)學(xué)專業(yè));2011年21期

8 王亞琴;劉小青;朱秋群;;第二產(chǎn)程中陰部神經(jīng)阻滯探討[J];中國(guó)誤診學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

9 郭靖;韓長(zhǎng)珍;霍愛(ài)萍;;陰部神經(jīng)阻滯與會(huì)陰局部浸潤(rùn)麻醉的應(yīng)用[J];基層醫(yī)學(xué)論壇;2011年14期

10 盧施吏;;陰部神經(jīng)阻滯陰道擴(kuò)張法在分娩中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)社區(qū)醫(yī)師(綜合版);2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2238424