金黃色葡萄球菌母嬰傳播風(fēng)險的前瞻性隊列研究
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the carrying rate of Staphylococcus aureus (Staphylococcus aureus, hereinafter referred to as SA) in pregnant women (vagina) and their neonates (oral, perinatal, ear and umbilical), to explore the drug sensitivity and molecular characteristics of SA, to study the homology of mother and infant SA and to predict the risk of maternal and infant transmission, and to provide a scientific basis for effective prevention and control measures. A prospective cohort study combined with molecular epidemiology was used to facilitate the sampling of pregnant women who were hospitalized and followed up. The pregnant women were divided into exposure groups according to the vaginal secretions of pregnant women (vaginal secretions separation and identification of SA positive) and non exposed groups (vaginal secretions isolated and identified SA negative). The outcome was the carrying rate of SA and relative risk ratio in the two groups of newborn babies born with SA. (relative risk, RR); the drug sensitivity analysis of SA using Kirby-Bauer test paper diffusion method and further identification of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA) strains. Using the paper diffusion method and mecA gene amplification method, t test, x 2 test or Fisher exact probability were used to compare the difference of other groups in different groups, the difference between the risk factors of SA and MRSA and the drug sensitivity of the newborn were explored. The factors of the single factor analysis of P0.05 were integrated into the generalized linear model for multi factor analysis; the Kappa test score was used. Analysis of the consistency between the phenotype of mother and baby SA and the characteristics of the toxin gene; using the PCR technique to detect the toxin gene (PVL, TST, ETA and ETB), and the further SCCmec molecular typing of the MRSA strain; use the multipoint sequencing (multilocus sequencing typing, MLST) to explore the local epidemic type and determine the homology of the mother and child. 1834 pregnant women, 133 of the exposure group (SA positive) and 1701 in the non exposed group (SA negative), were followed up for a total of 1834 newborn samples of.SA and MRSA: 1834 pregnant women, 133 (7.25%) carrying SA, 31 (1.69%) carrying MRSA.1834 name neonates, 60 (3.27%) carrying SA, 15 (0.82%) carrying MRSA. exposure. The carrying rate of SA in the group of newborn infants was 15.79%, MRSA was 2.26%, the rate of SA carrying in the non exposed group was 2.29%, the SA carrying rate of newborn infants in 0.71%. two was different, the MRSA carrying rate was no difference. The relative risk ratio of SA in the exposed group was 6.89 times as much as that of the non exposed group (95%CI: 4.18-11.36), adjusting the sex of the newborn, the mode of delivery, and whether the fetus was born. The relative risk of premature rupture of membrane and the number of pregnant days was 6.90 times higher than that of the non exposed group (95%CI:4.22-11.27). A total of 21 pairs of mothers and infants detected SA positive at the same time. Drug sensitivity test: the resistance rate of SA to clindamycin (41.35%), erythromycin (50.38%), teicorin (81.20%) and penicillin (92.48%) was higher in pregnant women. Compared to the strains of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), MRSA was a risk factor for multidrug resistance (OR=3.64; 95%CI:1.23-13.02). The resistance rate of neonatal SA to clindamycin (28.33%), erythromycin (46.67%) and penicillin (93.33%) was higher; MRSA was a risk factor for multidrug resistance (OR=12.36; 95). %CI:2.56-76.77). There was no difference in the drug sensitivity of SA in the exposed and non exposed neonates. The consistency of.21 to mother to child was statistically significant (P0.01), and the consistency was moderate (Kappa=0.523). The gene carrying rate of SA in pregnant women was 2.26%, 3.01%, 0% and 2.26%, and 5% and 3.33% in newborn infants. 11.67% and 0.00%. pregnant women and neonates with MRSA and MSSA carrying PVL, TST, ETA genes were not different from.21 to mother and baby, and the SA in mother and newborn was not detected in PVL and ETB genes. The consistency of mother and baby with TST and ETA genes was statistically significant. (0.462).SCCmec typing: among MRSA isolates from pregnant women, 45.16% (14/31) belong to hospital related MRSA (hospital-associated MRSA, HA-MRSA), and 29.03% (9/31) belong to community related MRSA (community-associated MRSA, CA-MRSA). RSA was dominated by SCCmec IV A (4/7) and type II (2/7). The resistance of HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA strains to clindamycin, erythromycin and penicillin were higher in pregnant women and neonates, and there was no statistical difference between the resistance and multidrug resistance of the 11 drugs. In the mother infant pair, 1 pairs of MRSA strains were detected and the same as SCCmec II.MLST: pregnant women. The main ST types of SA in the newborn were ST188 (37/133; 15/60), ST7 (18/133; 7/60) and ST6 (14/133; 5/60). A total of 19 pairs of child pairs were divided into one class, which was similar to the results obtained by eBURST V3 software analysis. Conclusion the carrying rate of SA in pregnant women and newborns in this region is slightly lower, but the carrying rate of MRSA strains in pregnant women is slightly higher. The SA of pregnant women and newborns about 65% and 38% of SA presents multidrug resistance, the drug resistance is serious and the carrying rate of virulence genes is low. MRSA is mainly hospital source, and the newborn is mainly community source. The ST types of SA in pregnant women and newborns are ST188, ST7 and ST6, MRSA mainly ST59, ST6 and ST188, which are close to the epidemic strains in our country, and are closely related to the international epidemic strains. 6.90 times as much as non - carrying newborns.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣東藥科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:R714.251
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉保光;王國強;蔡田;張程光;宋博利;;金黃色葡萄球菌分子分型方法[J];養(yǎng)殖與飼料;2016年09期
2 王芊;華川;李蘇利;李楊;;臨產(chǎn)婦宮頸分泌物臨床分離菌及耐藥性分析[J];中國感染與化療雜志;2015年03期
3 王冰;繆小平;;金黃色葡萄球菌的分子分型技術(shù)研究進展[J];職業(yè)與健康;2015年08期
4 毛鐳篥;肖盟;王賀;趙穎;徐英春;;全國多中心細(xì)菌耐藥監(jiān)測網(wǎng)中血流感染相關(guān)金黃色葡萄球菌的分子流行病學(xué)研究[J];中國感染與化療雜志;2015年02期
5 潘偉光;陳重;鄧啟文;;一對母嬰同時攜帶的金黃色葡萄球菌同源性分析[J];中國感染控制雜志;2013年01期
6 王鳳玲;張金艷;劉玉枝;劉國華;劉靜;;金黃色葡萄球菌致病毒素基因分布特性及與致病性的相關(guān)性[J];檢驗醫(yī)學(xué)與臨床;2011年16期
7 蘇麗婷;梁景龍;郭小建;馮飛;;金黃色葡萄球菌基因組DNA提取方法的比較[J];仲愷農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年01期
8 張霞;馬琳;劉盈;;葡萄球菌燙傷樣皮膚綜合征208例臨床分析[J];中國皮膚性病學(xué)雜志;2010年06期
9 夏蕊蕊;國憲虎;張玉臻;徐海;;喹諾酮類藥物及細(xì)菌對其耐藥性機制研究進展[J];中國抗生素雜志;2010年04期
10 李勇勇;黃文祥;;耐甲氧西林金黃色葡萄球菌的感染現(xiàn)狀與治療進展[J];國外醫(yī)藥(抗生素分冊);2010年01期
,本文編號:2150781
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/fuchankeerkelunwen/2150781.html