本文選題：子宮肌腺病 + 經(jīng)陰道超聲��； 參考：《醫(yī)學(xué)影像學(xué)雜志》2016年11期

【摘要】：目的探討經(jīng)陰道和經(jīng)腹部?jī)煞N超聲在子宮肌腺病診斷中的臨床價(jià)值。方法對(duì)子宮肌腺病患者108例隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為對(duì)照組與觀察組,每組54例,對(duì)照組患者行經(jīng)腹部超聲檢查,觀察組患者行經(jīng)陰道超聲檢查,比較兩組診斷結(jié)果。結(jié)果觀察組診斷準(zhǔn)確率90.74%,明顯高于對(duì)照組的75.93%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),觀察組敏感度88.89%,高于對(duì)照組的70.37%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);但兩組特異度比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論在子宮肌腺病診斷中采取經(jīng)陰道超聲診斷準(zhǔn)確率及敏感度優(yōu)于經(jīng)腹部超聲檢查,具有良好的臨床價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the clinical value of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of myoadenosis. Methods 108 patients with myometriosis were randomly divided into control group (n = 54) and observation group (n = 54). The patients in the control group were examined by transabdominal ultrasound, and the patients in the observation group were examined by transvaginal ultrasound. The diagnostic results of the two groups were compared. Results the diagnostic accuracy of the observation group was 90.74, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (75.93%). The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The sensitivity of the observation group was 88.89, which was higher than that of the control group (70.37%), and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the specificity between the two groups (P 0.05). Conclusion the accuracy and sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of uterine myoadenosis is better than that of transabdominal ultrasonography, which has good clinical value.
【作者單位】： 浙江省余姚市第二人民醫(yī)院特檢科;
【分類號(hào)】：R711.71;R445.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 譚文佳;王輝;軒麗麗;王佳;左欣f，

本文編號(hào)：1843709