發(fā)布時間：2018-04-14 03:19

  本文選題：超聲 + 盆底功能障礙�。� 參考：《遵義醫(yī)學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的： 應(yīng)用會陰超聲觀察康復(fù)治療對產(chǎn)后女性盆底結(jié)構(gòu)的影響,試探全面評價盆底功能障礙康復(fù)療效的影像學(xué)指標(biāo)，為臨床提供直觀、可靠的影像學(xué)依據(jù)。 方法： （1）收集2013年1月至2013年12月，在我院產(chǎn)后保健門診診斷的67例產(chǎn)后（Female pelvic floor dysfunction,FPFD）患者。所有病例隨機分2組：康復(fù)組(35例)和對照組(32例)，兩組病例均采取自身對照分析。 （2）康復(fù)組產(chǎn)后8周開始在我院盆底康復(fù)中心進(jìn)行盆底康復(fù)治療，療程8周；對照組產(chǎn)后只進(jìn)行一般的健康教育和產(chǎn)后保健操�？祻�(fù)組分別在產(chǎn)后6－8周和盆底康復(fù)治療后經(jīng)會陰超聲檢查；對照組分別在產(chǎn)后6－8周和產(chǎn)后20周經(jīng)會陰超聲檢查。 （3）應(yīng)用會陰超聲分別在靜息、縮肛、瓦氏動作時動態(tài)觀察產(chǎn)后康復(fù)治療對FPFD盆底結(jié)構(gòu)的影響，獲得膀胱頸移動度（bladder neck descen,BND），存儲三維容積數(shù)據(jù)，脫機應(yīng)用4Dview軟件后處理，測量盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑、左右徑和恥骨直腸肌的寬度，并對上述參數(shù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計分析。 結(jié)果： （1）康復(fù)組：靜息和瓦氏動作時康復(fù)治療后的盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑較康復(fù)治療前（產(chǎn)后6-8周）縮小,有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（p＜0.05），左右徑、恥骨直腸肌寬度均未見明顯改變（p＞0.05），BND較康復(fù)治療前減小，有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異（p＜0.05）；縮肛時康復(fù)治療后的盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑和左右徑均小于康復(fù)治療前（p＜0.05），恥骨直腸肌寬度稍大于康復(fù)治療前（p＜0.05），有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義。 （2）對照組：產(chǎn)后20周，靜息和瓦氏動作時盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑、恥骨直腸肌寬度及BND與產(chǎn)后6-8周比較均無明顯變化（p＞0.05），靜息時盆膈裂孔左右徑無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（p＞0.05），瓦氏動作時盆膈裂孔左右徑比產(chǎn)后6-8周時增大（p＜0.05）；縮肛時產(chǎn)后20周的盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑和左右徑均小于產(chǎn)后6-8周（p＜0.05），恥骨直腸肌寬度與產(chǎn)后6-8周比較未見明顯差異（p＞0.05）。 （3）康復(fù)組與對照組各參數(shù)對比：靜息和瓦氏動作時，康復(fù)組盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑、左右徑及BND均比對照組變小，有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義（p＜0.05），靜息時恥骨直腸肌無明顯變化；瓦氏動作時，康復(fù)組恥骨直腸肌寬度比對照組稍寬(p＜0.05）；縮肛時盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑和左右徑和恥骨直腸肌，兩組病例比較未見明顯差異。 （4）康復(fù)組與對照組各參數(shù)差值比較：靜息時的盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑和左右徑和恥骨直腸肌的差值，兩組病例比較均無明顯變化（p＞0.05），，瓦氏動作時兩組病例盆膈裂孔面積、周長、前后徑和左右徑的差值均有差異（p＜0.05），恥骨直腸肌的差值無明顯變化（p＞0.05），康復(fù)組與對照組BND差值比較有差異（p＜0.05）；縮肛時兩組病例盆膈裂孔面積、前后徑和左右徑的差值有差異（p＜0.05），周長和恥骨直腸肌的差值無明顯變化（p＞0.05）。 結(jié)論： （1）本課題研究證實了妊娠和分娩對女性盆底結(jié)構(gòu)造成不同程度的損傷，是引發(fā)產(chǎn)后早期FPFD的重要危險因素；會陰超聲可以推廣應(yīng)用于產(chǎn)后FPFD的診斷篩查、定量評估和康復(fù)療效的評價，是一項具有重要臨床價值的影像學(xué)技術(shù)。 （2）經(jīng)會陰超聲動態(tài)觀察盆底康復(fù)治療前后盆底結(jié)構(gòu)的各參數(shù)變化，統(tǒng)計分析認(rèn)為盆膈裂孔、恥骨直腸肌和BND能全面和動態(tài)反映盆底結(jié)構(gòu)、功能的變化,可作為評價盆底康復(fù)療效的重要影像學(xué)指標(biāo)，來進(jìn)行盆底形態(tài)學(xué)和功能學(xué)的評價，為臨床提供真實、可靠的影像學(xué)依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Objective:
Objective To observe the effect of rehabilitation therapy on postpartum female pelvic floor structure by perineal ultrasound, and to explore the imaging indexes of pelvic floor dysfunction in order to provide intuitive and reliable imaging evidence for clinical practice.
Method:
(1) 67 cases of Female pelvic floor dysfunction (FPFD) diagnosed in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2013 were collected. All cases were randomly divided into 2 groups: rehabilitation group (35 cases) and control group (32 cases), two cases were self controlled analysis.
(2) the rehabilitation group started 8 weeks postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation in the rehabilitation center of our hospital, 8 weeks; the control group only routine postpartum health education and postpartum health care. The rehabilitation group were at 6-8 weeks postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation after treatment and transperineal ultrasonography; the control group respectively at 6-8 weeks postpartum and 20 weeks postpartum perineal ultrasonography.
(3) the application of perineal ultrasound in resting anal contraction, respectively, Valsalva maneuver dynamic observation of postpartum rehabilitation therapy on FPFD pelvic floor structure, obtain the bladder neck mobility (bladder neck, descen, BND), three-dimensional data storage, offline application of 4Dview postprocessing software, measuring the hiatus area, perimeter, diameter, diameter and puborectalis width, and the above parameters were analyzed.
Result:
(1) the rehabilitation group: resting and Valsalva maneuver rehabilitation after treatment of pelvic diaphragm hiatus area, perimeter, diameter compared with before treatment (6-8 weeks postpartum) reduced, with statistical significance (P < 0.05), diameter, width of puborectalis muscle showed no significant changes (P > 0.05), BND before treatment decreased, there was significant difference (P < 0.05); anal contraction rehabilitation after treatment of pelvic diaphragm hiatus area, perimeter, posterior diameter and left-right diameter were less than before treatment (P < 0.05), puborectalis muscle width slightly larger than before treatment (P < 0.05), there was statistical significance.
(2) control group: 20 weeks postpartum, resting and Valsalva maneuver when the hiatus area, perimeter, diameter, puborectalis width and BND and 6-8 weeks postpartum had no significant change (P > 0.05), resting hiatus diameter was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Valsalva maneuver when hiatus diameter than 6-8 weeks postpartum increased (P < 0.05); anal contraction during and after 20 weeks of pelvic diaphragm hiatus area, perimeter, posterior diameter and left-right diameter were less than 6-8 weeks postpartum (P < 0.05), puborectalis muscle width and 6-8 weeks postpartum compared no significant difference (P > 0.05).
(3) rehabilitation group and control group comparing the parameters of resting and Valsalva maneuver, rehabilitation group hiatus area, perimeter, diameter, diameter and BND were smaller than the control group, was statistically significant (P < 0.05), resting puborectal muscle had no obvious change; Valsalva maneuver. The rehabilitation group than the control group of puborectal muscle width slightly wider (P < 0.05); when the levator hiatus area, perimeter, diameter and diameter and puborectalis muscle, two cases were no obvious difference.
(4) rehabilitation group and control group each parameter difference: the pelvic diaphragm hiatus resting area, perimeter, diameter and diameter and the difference about the puborectalis muscle, two cases had no significant change (P > 0.05), when the Valsalva maneuver group two cases of pelvic diaphragm hiatus area, perimeter. Posterior diameter and left-right diameter difference difference (P < 0.05), the difference of the puborectalis muscle did not change significantly (P > 0.05), the rehabilitation group and the control group BND difference difference (P < 0.05); two cases of levator hiatus area, posterior diameter and left-right diameter difference there are differences (P < 0.05), the difference between the perimeter and the puborectalis muscle did not change significantly (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
(1) this study confirmed that pregnancy and childbirth cause of female pelvic floor structure damage is an important risk factor of FPFD caused early postpartum perineal ultrasound diagnosis; can be applied to the screening for postpartum FPFD evaluation, quantitative evaluation and rehabilitation treatment, is a technology has important clinical value in imaging.
(2) the dynamic observation of pelvic floor rehabilitation of perineal ultrasound parameters in pelvic floor structure before and after the treatment, the statistic analysis of pelvic diaphragm hiatus, rectal muscle and BND can fully reflect the dynamic and pubic pelvic floor structures, function changes, can be used as an important imaging evaluation of pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment index to evaluate the morphology and function of pelvic floor the basis for clinical provide true, reliable imaging.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：遵義醫(yī)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：R445.1;R714.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳華;王慧芳;;經(jīng)會陰超聲診斷前腔室功能障礙性疾病的臨床應(yīng)用[J];中國介入影像與治療學(xué);2011年05期

2 葉培香;江麗;宋巖峰;朱建平;;壓力性尿失禁女性患者盆底三維超聲觀察[J];臨床超聲醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2009年09期

3 徐繁華;王慧芳;鄭靜;李華峰;陳華;;經(jīng)會陰三維超聲評價女性盆底肌肉形態(tài)及功能[J];中國介入影像與治療學(xué);2013年06期

4 陳瑞云;宋巖峰;江麗;朱建平;黃惠娟;;肛提肌收縮功能的三維超聲評估[J];實用婦產(chǎn)科雜志;2010年09期

5 吳氫凱;張榮;程慧;馮潔;應(yīng)濤;李勤;羅來敏;惠寧;;盆底三維超聲觀察不同分娩方式對初產(chǎn)女性盆膈裂孔的影響[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2011年05期

6 蘭世英;古麗娜·阿巴拜克力;;女性盆底功能障礙性疾病非手術(shù)治療進(jìn)展[J];新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年11期

7 帥翰林;羅新;王曉玉;;妊娠晚期婦女與同齡婦女盆底膠原組織的對比研究[J];中國婦幼保健;2007年36期

8 宋梅;朱建平;江麗;;會陰三維超聲觀察生育后無盆底功能障礙女性盆膈裂孔的形態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)[J];中華醫(yī)學(xué)超聲雜志(電子版);2011年01期

9 江麗;朱建平;葉培香;宋梅;;經(jīng)會陰二維超聲對壓力性尿失禁女性患者盆底的動態(tài)觀察與評估[J];中華醫(yī)學(xué)超聲雜志(電子版);2012年04期

10 龍燕;邊旭明;朱蘭;滕莉榮;李雷;郎景和;;分娩方式對產(chǎn)婦盆底支持組織功能的近期影響[J];中華婦產(chǎn)科雜志;2007年12期

本文編號：1747484