本文選題：球囊阻斷　切入點(diǎn)：主動(dòng)脈　出處：《中國(guó)介入影像與治療學(xué)》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的分析剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)中腹主動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端球囊阻斷對(duì)于治療兇險(xiǎn)性前置胎盤合并胎盤植入的臨床療效。方法回顧性分析72例兇險(xiǎn)性前置胎盤合并胎盤植入產(chǎn)婦的資料。其中53例(阻斷組)于剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)前預(yù)留腹主動(dòng)脈球囊導(dǎo)管,術(shù)中暫時(shí)阻斷腹主動(dòng)脈血流;19例(未阻斷組)未留置腹主動(dòng)脈球囊導(dǎo)管,直接行剖宮產(chǎn)手術(shù)。比較2組術(shù)中、術(shù)后情況及新生兒情況。結(jié)果球囊阻斷組術(shù)中出血量、術(shù)中輸血量、子宮切除率均低于未阻斷組(P均0.05),2組間術(shù)后轉(zhuǎn)入重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室(ICU)的比例及ICU住院時(shí)間差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均0.05),手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后感染發(fā)生率及術(shù)后住院總時(shí)間差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均0.05)。2組間新生兒體質(zhì)量及出生后5min、10min的Apgar評(píng)分差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均0.05)。結(jié)論兇險(xiǎn)性前置胎盤合并胎盤植入剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)中行腹主動(dòng)脈遠(yuǎn)端球囊阻斷安全可行,可有效減少術(shù)中出血及輸血量,降低子宮切除率。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the clinical effect of abdominal aortic distally balloon occlusion in caesarean section for the treatment of severe placenta previa with placenta accreta. Methods 72 cases of perilous placenta previa with placenta accreta were retrospectively analyzed. The abdominal aortic balloon catheter was reserved before cesarean section in 53 cases (block group). The abdominal aorta blood flow was temporarily blocked in 19 cases (unblocked group), the abdominal aortic balloon catheter was not placed, and the cesarean section was performed directly. The intraoperative, postoperative and neonatal conditions were compared between the two groups. Results the amount of blood lost during the operation in the balloon occlusion group was higher than that in the control group. There were significant differences in the volume of blood transfusion and the rate of hysterectomy between the two groups compared with those in the unblocked group (P < 0.05) and the length of ICU stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). There was no significant difference in incidence of infection after operation and total length of stay after operation. Conclusion there was no significant difference in neonatal body mass and Apgar score between two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion there is no significant difference in Apgar score between two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in Apgar score between two groups. Conclusion there is no significant difference in placenta previa associated with placenta implantation. It is safe and feasible to perform balloon occlusion of distal abdominal aorta during cesarean section. It can effectively reduce intraoperative bleeding and blood transfusion, and reduce the rate of hysterectomy.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬盛京醫(yī)院放射科;中國(guó)醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬盛京醫(yī)院心內(nèi)科;
【分類號(hào)】：R719.8

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳燕 ,張瑞鳳;重度胎盤植入1例報(bào)告[J];中國(guó)煤炭工業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2002年07期

2 丁依玲,彭梅;3種方法保守治療胎盤植入19例的比較[J];中國(guó)婦幼保健;2005年19期

3 Chauveaud-Lambling A.;Antonetti-N' Diaye E.;DeRudnicki S.;劉亦恒;;胎盤植入的處理(法國(guó))[J];世界核心醫(yī)學(xué)期刊文摘(婦產(chǎn)科學(xué)分冊(cè));2005年11期

4 程曉萱;;保守治療胎盤植入2例報(bào)道[J];皖南醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

5 于春華;;胎盤植入保守治療26例臨床報(bào)告[J];現(xiàn)代婦產(chǎn)科進(jìn)展;2006年06期

6 韋玲華;陳彥紅;;胎盤植入的超聲診斷(附28例報(bào)告)[J];廣西醫(yī)學(xué);2006年08期

7 許劍利;王曉東;徐克惠;蒲杰;徐愛群;曾蔚越;;藥物保守治療胎盤植入病例分析及文獻(xiàn)復(fù)習(xí)[J];華西醫(yī)學(xué);2006年04期

8 梁承蓉;彭曉慶;;早期妊娠胎盤植入宮頸1例[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用婦科與產(chǎn)科雜志;2006年10期

9 應(yīng)豪;阮晟鳴;王德芬;;胎盤植入的診治進(jìn)展[J];實(shí)用婦產(chǎn)科雜志;2007年06期

10 羅利;黃毅嵐;譚世橋;徐雁飛;;胎盤植入25例臨床分析[J];實(shí)用婦產(chǎn)科雜志;2007年09期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 盧芳;張白雪;;胎盤植入20例臨床報(bào)告[A];紀(jì)念卓越的人民醫(yī)學(xué)家林巧稚大夫誕辰100周年——全國(guó)婦產(chǎn)科高級(jí)學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文集[C];2001年

2 樊晟;;胎盤植入18例分析[A];第三屆長(zhǎng)三角圍產(chǎn)醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論壇暨2006年浙江省圍產(chǎn)醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2006年

3 晉柏;孫麗洲;;胎盤植入3例治療搶救總結(jié)[A];第三屆長(zhǎng)三角圍產(chǎn)醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論壇暨2006年浙江省圍產(chǎn)醫(yī)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2006年

4 張超;劉欣燕;;胎盤植入51例臨床分析[A];全國(guó)圍產(chǎn)醫(yī)學(xué)專題學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文匯編[C];2007年

5 王琳;唐龍珍;汪佳;唐t，

本文編號(hào)：1607168