不同霧化吸入方式對(duì)嬰幼兒毛細(xì)支氣管炎后反復(fù)喘息的臨床干預(yù)研究
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the clinical effects of inhaling budesonide suspension with air compression pump and inhaling flutica propionate aerosol in treating infant bronchiolitis (infantile bronchiolitis) with repeated wheezing. It provides a more safe, economical and effective scheme for the clinical treatment of recurrent wheezing after bronchiolitis in infants and early intervention to reduce the incidence of asthma after bronchiolitis. Methods A total of 120 infants who were hospitalized in our department and diagnosed with bronchiolitis were enrolled in this study. 120 children with recurrent wheezing from October 2011 to October 2012 were enrolled in this study. There were no statistical differences in sex, body weight, birth history, etc. They were divided into observation group and control group, the control group (n = 60) was able to inhale fluticasone propionate aerosol (fluticasone propionate 125 渭 g / kg) once a time in the morning and evening, and 60 cases in the control group. The patients with controlled condition were treated with downgrade therapy at a dose of 125 渭 g / time once a day after maintenance therapy for 3 months, and those patients with uncontrolled condition were given upgraded treatment, which could increase the dose of inhaled glucocorticoid or combined with leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA). Children who had no improvement in the symptoms of inhaling cosulone during acute attack were treated with oral or intravenous glucocorticoids. In the observation group, 60 cases were in good economic condition. The family actively cooperated with the use of air compression pump and inhaled budesonide suspension (Pulmicort) 500 渭 g / time, once in the morning and once in the morning, and the disease was completely controlled. Patients with close to normal pulmonary function were treated with continuous treatment for 3 months, and treated with demotion treatment, which was replaced by Pulmicort 500 渭 g / time once a day; those who were not controlled were given upgrade therapy to increase the dose of inhaled hormone or combined with LTRA. the two groups were followed up for one year. The degree of disease control, the number of times of recurrent wheezing, the number of hospitalization for acute attack, the changes of lung function and the cost of treatment were observed. Results 1the early intervention of inhaled glucocorticoid was not only for the remission of asthma after bronchiolitis, but also for the treatment of inhaled glucocorticoid. There was also a better effect on reducing the frequency of wheezing attack in children and avoiding the possibility of developing asthma in the future. 2 the two groups had better curative effect in controlling the condition of wheezing attack and reducing the frequency of recurrent wheezing. There was no significant difference in the improvement of pulmonary function between the two groups (P0.05). After treatment, the pulmonary function indexes such as tidal volume (VT / Kg), respiratory rate (RR), inspiratory time / exhalation time (tie / TE), peak time ratio (TPEF / TE), peak volume ratio (VPEF / VE) were significantly improved after treatment. There was statistical difference (P0.05). 4 the treatment cost in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P0.05). Conclusion (1) the therapeutic effect of inhaled glucocorticoid on recurrent wheezing after bronchiolitis is obvious. 2 the measurement of respiratory and pulmonary function of tidal breathing is simple, safe and economical. The therapeutic effect of inhaled glucocorticoid on evaluating the wheezing attack after bronchiolitis is obvious. The value of monitoring the state of illness and prognosis was higher than that of Pulmicort. 3. The clinical efficacy of Pulmicort was similar to that of Pulmicort in the treatment of recurrent wheezing after bronchiolitis. This study showed that the clinical treatment cost of Pulmicort was significantly higher than that of cosuxone. So the use of cosolone is more economical and convenient.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:R725.6
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 萬(wàn)圣云;徐周緯;潘升權(quán);丁洋;;下肢深靜脈血栓形成的病因及診斷的研究進(jìn)展[J];當(dāng)代醫(yī)學(xué);2009年34期
2 王真;張軍;李民;范春芝;溫朝陽(yáng);;超聲彈性成像實(shí)時(shí)及半定量評(píng)價(jià)不同階段下肢深靜脈血栓的初步臨床研究[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年12期
3 馬秀梅;范美鳳;;婦產(chǎn)科術(shù)后靜脈血栓栓塞6例診治體會(huì)[J];河北醫(yī)學(xué);2010年12期
4 王雷;陳明;;超聲彈性成像在診斷深靜脈血栓中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)介入影像與治療學(xué);2010年06期
5 韓俊柱;尹宗生;耿春輝;劉濤;;PFN治療股骨轉(zhuǎn)子間骨折的相關(guān)并發(fā)癥及對(duì)策[J];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期
6 劉英;劉莉;楊占清;陳巍;柳巨雄;袁川評(píng);付守鵬;劉穎;王瑋;;血栓閉塞性脈管炎大鼠模型的建立及鑒定[J];中國(guó)獸醫(yī)學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 魯祥石;康脈Ⅱ號(hào)膠囊口服和篷子菜浸出液濕敷治療腫瘤術(shù)后化療置管所致輸液性靜脈炎的臨床和實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2013年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 李云建;深靜脈血栓形成前NOX4表達(dá)變化的實(shí)驗(yàn)與臨床研究[D];昆明醫(yī)學(xué)院;2011年
2 劉育成;血細(xì)胞源性TF表達(dá)與肢體動(dòng)、靜脈血栓關(guān)系的研究[D];福建醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年
3 武貝;不同灌注模式治療急性髂股靜脈血栓的療效評(píng)價(jià)[D];南京醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年
4 王真;不同時(shí)期下肢深靜脈血栓超聲彈性成像評(píng)價(jià)的初步臨床研究[D];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2011年
5 鄭tU
本文編號(hào):2127071
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/eklw/2127071.html