本文選題：超重 + 肥胖癥��； 參考：《中國(guó)學(xué)校衛(wèi)生》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的了解烏魯木齊市維吾爾族流動(dòng)與非流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生超重肥胖狀況,為制定維吾爾族中小學(xué)生體重干預(yù)措施提供理論支持。方法非流動(dòng)維吾爾族中小學(xué)生選自烏魯木齊市隨機(jī)抽取的6所普通中小學(xué)校,流動(dòng)維吾爾族中小學(xué)生選自流動(dòng)學(xué)生較多的6所學(xué)校。每所學(xué)校隨機(jī)抽取10個(gè)教學(xué)班級(jí),分別對(duì)1 868名非流動(dòng)學(xué)生和1 746名流動(dòng)學(xué)生進(jìn)行超重肥胖狀況調(diào)查。結(jié)果維吾爾族中小學(xué)生超重檢出率為12.5%,肥胖檢出率為11.1%。非流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生超重率為15.6%,流動(dòng)學(xué)生為9.3%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ~2=32.67,P0.01);非流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生肥胖率為16.0%,流動(dòng)學(xué)生為5.9%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ~2=93.25,P0.01)。小學(xué)一至三年級(jí)、四至六年級(jí)和初中一至三年級(jí)中維吾爾族非流動(dòng)小學(xué)生的超重和肥胖檢出率均高于流動(dòng)小學(xué)生,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ~2值分別為21.51,29.93,124.04,P值均0.01)。父親文化程度在初中和高中及以上組,維吾爾族非流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生的超重和肥胖檢出率均高于流動(dòng)學(xué)生,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ~2值分別為63.6,22.9,P值均0.01)。獨(dú)生子女和非獨(dú)生子女家庭中,非流動(dòng)維吾爾族中小學(xué)生的超重和肥胖檢出率均高于流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ~2值為13.01,56.83,P值均0.01)。在父母均不超重肥胖、僅父親超重肥胖、僅母親超重肥胖組中,維吾爾族非流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生超重和肥胖檢出率均高于流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ~2值分別為36.24,25.60,32.91,P值均0.01)。在是否每天吃早飯、每天睡眠時(shí)間、每天鍛煉時(shí)間、使用計(jì)算機(jī)等組中,非流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生的超重和肥胖檢出率均高于流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值均0.01)。結(jié)論烏魯木齊市維吾爾族非流動(dòng)中小學(xué)生的超重肥胖檢出率均高于流動(dòng)學(xué)生。應(yīng)重視維吾爾族中小學(xué)生超重肥胖狀況的發(fā)展,必要時(shí)應(yīng)采取有效的措施進(jìn)行干預(yù)引導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the overweight and obesity status of Uygur floating and non-mobile primary and middle school students in Urumqi, and to provide theoretical support for formulating the intervention measures of Uygur primary and middle school students' body weight. Methods Non-mobile Uygur primary and middle school students were selected from 6 general primary and middle schools in Urumqi, and mobile Uygur primary and middle school students were selected from 6 schools with more floating students. Ten teaching classes were randomly selected from each school to investigate the overweight and obesity status of 1 868 non-floating students and 1 746 floating students respectively. Results the prevalence rate of overweight and obesity in Uygur primary and middle school students was 12.5 and 11.1 respectively. The overweight rate of non-mobile primary and middle school students was 15.6and that of floating students was 9.3, the difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ (2) 2.67 ~ (7) P _ (0.01), the obesity rate of non-floating primary and middle school students was 16.0 and that of floating students was 5.9% (蠂 ~ (2 / 2) / 93.25 / P _ (0.01). The prevalence rate of overweight and obesity of Uygur non-floating pupils in grade 1 to 3, grade 4 to 6 and grade 1 to 3 of junior high school was higher than that of floating pupils, and the difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 = 21.51, 29.93124.04, P = 0.01). The prevalence rate of overweight and obesity of Uygur non-floating primary and middle school students was higher than that of floating students, and the difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ (2) = 63.6 ~ (22. 9) P = 0. 01). The prevalence rate of overweight and obesity in non-mobile Uygur primary and middle school students was higher than that in floating primary and middle school students, and the difference was statistically significant (蠂 ~ 2 = 13.01, P = 56.83, P = 0.01). The prevalence rate of overweight and obesity in Uygur non-floating primary and middle school students was higher than that in floating primary and middle school students (蠂 ~ 2 = 36.24 ~ 25.60 ~ 32.91g P = 0.01). In the groups of whether to eat breakfast, sleep time, exercise time every day and use computer, the detection rate of overweight and obesity of non-mobile primary and middle school students was higher than that of floating primary and middle school students, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion the prevalence rate of overweight and obesity of Uygur non-floating primary and middle school students in Urumqi is higher than that of floating students. Attention should be paid to the development of overweight and obesity among Uygur primary and middle school students, and effective measures should be taken to guide them.
【作者單位】： 延安大學(xué)體育學(xué)院;新疆維吾爾自治區(qū)疾病預(yù)防控制中心;
【分類號(hào)】：R723.14

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林蓉;杜琳;劉偉佳;林琳;吳家剛;劉偉;張維蔚;靜進(jìn);;廣州市城區(qū)兒童超重肥胖影響因素分析[J];中國(guó)兒童保健雜志;2011年05期

2 王紅娟;于國(guó)偉;牛靜萍;;蘭州市兒童青少年超重肥胖不同標(biāo)準(zhǔn)比較分析[J];中國(guó)學(xué)校衛(wèi)生;2011年07期

3 王春平;李明輝;;小學(xué)生超重肥胖狀況及影響因素分析[J];中國(guó)社區(qū)醫(yī)師(醫(yī)學(xué)專業(yè));2012年24期

4 王偉;張?jiān)路?楊麗芳;俱西馳;張歡;郭萌;;西安市城區(qū)11~12歲超重肥胖兒童飲食行為及認(rèn)知調(diào)查分析[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2014年03期

5 相改琴;戴侃記;;商洛市中小學(xué)生生活方式與超重肥胖的相關(guān)性分析[J];實(shí)用預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2014年05期

6 陶秀娟;趙偉明;李吳萍;劉賀榮;楊靜芳;;吳忠市回、漢族中小學(xué)生超重肥胖現(xiàn)況調(diào)查[J];中國(guó)婦幼保健;2009年20期

7 宋丹;武光林;;天津市小學(xué)生影響超重肥胖發(fā)生的飲食相關(guān)因素的病例對(duì)照分析[J];預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)論壇;2011年02期

8 馬林;超重肥胖兒童綜合減肥觀察與探討[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期

9 王新利,孫江平,葉廣俊;超重肥胖兒童空腹胰島素水平與高血壓病家族史的關(guān)系[J];衛(wèi)生研究;2001年02期

10 陳紅芬;;丹陽(yáng)市中小學(xué)生超重肥胖血壓偏高現(xiàn)狀分析[J];中國(guó)學(xué)校衛(wèi)生;2012年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 孫國(guó)哲;李陽(yáng);周興虎;郭瀟繁;李媛;焦云娣;孫英賢;;超重肥胖對(duì)兒童體表心電圖時(shí)間參數(shù)的影響[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)心電生理和起搏分會(huì)第十次全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)會(huì)議匯編[C];2012年

2 王新利;孫江平;葉廣俊;;超重肥胖兒童空腹胰島素水平與高血壓病家族史的關(guān)系[A];達(dá)能營(yíng)養(yǎng)中心青年科學(xué)工作者論壇優(yōu)秀論文集2001年第2期[C];2001年

3 馮敏;曾果;劉婧;程改平;郭宏霞;;學(xué)齡兒童超重肥胖與代謝綜合征關(guān)系研究[A];“全國(guó)老年?duì)I養(yǎng)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)”暨“四川省營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)會(huì)成立二十周年慶祝會(huì)”會(huì)議錄[C];2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張春華;重慶市小學(xué)生超重肥胖與高血壓流行現(xiàn)狀及影響因素研究[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué);2016年

2 王曉蕾;城市化對(duì)兒童青少年超重和肥胖的影響[D];中國(guó)疾病預(yù)防控制中心;2016年

3 付紅;中小學(xué)生家長(zhǎng)肥胖相關(guān)知信行與子女超重肥胖關(guān)系的研究[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2016年

4 胡菡瓊;杭州市余杭區(qū)中學(xué)生靜態(tài)行為現(xiàn)狀及其與超重肥胖的關(guān)聯(lián)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年

5 陽(yáng)贛萍;長(zhǎng)沙市3～6年級(jí)小學(xué)生肥胖及其相關(guān)知識(shí)、態(tài)度、行為的現(xiàn)狀研究[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1893358