【摘要】：新中國成立后很長一段時間內(nèi),受政治因素的影響,對地震新聞的報道一直并未完全做到公開透明。媒體對汶川地震的報道可以說是開創(chuàng)了我國媒體對突發(fā)性事件報道的新紀(jì)元,不僅做到了及時、公開、透明,幾份大報更是做到了有力的引導(dǎo)輿論,實現(xiàn)了媒介的價值。本文選取《人民日報》與《南方周末》對汶川地震的新聞報道作為分析文本,運用敘事學(xué)理論,以兩報建構(gòu)的敘事事實的差異為切入點,從敘事視角、敘事人和敘事方式的選擇三方面分析兩報敘事方法的差異,進(jìn)而對兩報敘事效果的不同進(jìn)行了分析,最終進(jìn)入到對兩報敘事差異的原因進(jìn)行研究。運用敘事學(xué)理論對新聞報道進(jìn)行分析研究,為新聞報道的寫作提供了重要的理論工具,本文試圖通過對兩報汶川地震的新聞報道進(jìn)行敘事學(xué)分析,為廣大新聞工作者的新聞寫作提供一種理論依據(jù)與參照。
[Abstract]:For a long time since the founding of the people's Republic of China, due to political factors, the reporting of earthquake news has not been completely transparent. The media report on Wenchuan earthquake can be said to have opened a new era of Chinese media reporting on unexpected events, not only to achieve timely, open, transparent, several newspapers are able to guide public opinion, realize the value of the media. This paper selects the news reports of Wenchuan earthquake from People's Daily and Southern weekend as the analysis text, using narratology theory, taking the difference of narrative facts constructed by the two newspapers as the breakthrough point, from the perspective of narrative. This paper analyzes the differences of narrative methods between the two newspapers from the three aspects of the narrator and the choice of narrative methods, and then analyzes the different narrative effects of the two newspapers, and finally enters into the study of the reasons for the narrative differences between the two newspapers. Using narratology theory to analyze and study news reports, it provides an important theoretical tool for the writing of news reports. This paper attempts to carry out narratological analysis of the news reports of the Wenchuan earthquake. To provide a theoretical basis and reference for journalists' journalistic writing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G212
，

本文編號：2348021