本文關(guān)鍵詞：《我的安東妮亞》英漢文本的及物性過程對比研究

  更多相關(guān)文章： 《我的安東妮亞》 及物性過程 比較 對比

【摘要】：本文分別抽取《我的安東妮亞》中四個相對應(yīng)的英漢文本進行對比分析,旨在探討英漢兩種語言在及物性過程方面的異同。具體來說,本研究試圖解決三個研究問題：(1)《我的安東妮亞》的英漢文本分別包含哪些及物性過程?(2)英漢及物性過程的分布有何異同?(3)造成這些異同的因素是什么?本文以韓禮德系統(tǒng)功能語法的及物性為理論基礎(chǔ),采取定量分析與定性分析相結(jié)合的方式對樣本進行了分析。定量分析主要是呈現(xiàn)各個及物性過程在樣本中的分布情況,定性分析不僅用于分析英漢間的過程轉(zhuǎn)換,表現(xiàn)及物性在揭示主人公安東妮亞性格特征的適用性,也用于揭示英漢及物性過程的異同。通過中英及物性過程的比較和對比,本研究獲得六個發(fā)現(xiàn)。相同點：(1)漢語中六個及物性過程的分布大體上與其英語原文保持一致；(2)在小句主語不明確或者不清楚的情況下,英語和漢語的及物性過程均采用被動語態(tài)。不同點：(1)英語的關(guān)系過程與漢語的關(guān)系過程在關(guān)系連接動詞的組成成分方面存在差異；(2)英語多用被動語態(tài),漢語多用主動語態(tài)。漢語通過在物質(zhì)過程動詞前添加“把”“讓”將英語被動語態(tài)的物質(zhì)過程轉(zhuǎn)換為主動語態(tài)；(3)英語的關(guān)系過程轉(zhuǎn)換為漢語的物質(zhì)過程主要是由于靜態(tài)詞轉(zhuǎn)換為動態(tài)詞造成的；(4)在應(yīng)對英語系表結(jié)構(gòu)“get+adjective"的及物性過程時,漢語通常會增加或刪減其中的過程類型。造成“get+adjective"結(jié)構(gòu)的及物性過程發(fā)生過程轉(zhuǎn)換的原因主要是忽略了翻譯“get”這個動詞的意思并增譯了一個新的動詞,同時,"get+adjective"結(jié)構(gòu)中形容詞意思的不具體性是造成過程轉(zhuǎn)換的另一原因。英漢及物性的異同主要歸結(jié)于小說的主題和體裁與及連接詞在中英文本中的使用情況。小說的主題及體裁影響及物性過程的分布,連接詞在中英文小句構(gòu)建中的不同作用是造成及物性過程轉(zhuǎn)換的主要原因。
【關(guān)鍵詞】：《我的安東妮亞》 及物性過程 比較 對比
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：H146;H314
【目錄】：

• 中文摘要3-4
• Abstract4-10
• Chapter 1 Introduction10-13
• 1.1 Introduction of Willa Cather and My Antonia10
• 1.2 Research questions of this study10-11
• 1.3 Research method of this study11
• 1.4 Significance of this study11-12
• 1.5 Organization of this study12-13
• Chapter 2 Literature Review13-22
• 2.1 Previous analysis on My Antonia13-14
• 2.2 Previous studies of transitivity in discourse analysis14-19
• 2.2.1 Previous studies of transitivity abroad14-16
• 2.2.2 Previous studies of transitivity at home16-19
• 2.3 Previous studies of English-Chinese(E-C)translation from the perspective of transitivity19-22
• Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework22-32
• 3.1 Definition of transitivity22
• 3.2 Types of processes in transitivity22-28
• 3.3 Other concepts in transitivity process28-30
• 3.3.1 Beneficiary,Range in transitivity process28-29
• 3.3.2 Circumstantial elements29-30
• 3.4 Phenomenon of process transfer30-32
• Chapter 4 Methodology32-40
• 4.1 Source of data32
• 4.2 Data collection32-38
• 4.2.1 Sample texts in My Antonia32-34
• 4.2.1.1 Classifications of My Antonia32-33
• 4.2.1.2 Criteria of the classifications of My Antonia33
• 4.2.1.3 Criteria of the selection of sample texts33-34
• 4.2.2 Transitivity in the sample texts34-37
• 4.2.2.1 Classifications of transitivity process34-36
• 4.2.2.2 Criteria of the classifications of transitivity process36
• 4.2.2.3 Methods of the classifications of transitivity process36-37
• 4.2.3 Procedures of data collection37-38
• 4.3 Data analysis38-40
• Chapter 5 Results and Discussions40-73
• 5.1 Contrastive analysis of part one40-47
• 5.1.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text40-43
• 5.1.2 Transitivity analysis of the target text43-44
• 5.1.3 Comparison between the source text and target text44-47
• 5.2 Contrastive analysis of part two47-56
• 5.2.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text47-49
• 5.2.2 Transitivity analysis of the target text49-50
• 5.2.3 Comparison between the source text and target text50-56
• 5.2.3.1 Verbs in material processes50-53
• 5.2.3.2 Passive voice in mental processes53-54
• 5.2.3.3 Mutual process transfer between material and relational processes54-55
• 5.2.3.4 Static-Dynamic conversion in mental processes55-56
• 5.3 Contrastive analysis of part three56-63
• 5.3.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text56-58
• 5.3.2 Transitivity analysis of the target text58-59
• 5.3.3 Comparison between the source text and target text59-63
• 5.3.3.1 Variation of relational process verbs in relational processes60-61
• 5.3.3.2 Conversion from relational processes to mental processes61-62
• 5.3.3.3 Intensive in relational processes62
• 5.3.3.4 Conversion from passive material process to existential process62-63
• 5.4 Contrastive analysis of part four63-69
• 5.4.1 Transitivity analysis of the source text63-64
• 5.4.2 Relational processes concerning Antonia of the source text64-65
• 5.4.3 Transitivity analysis of the target text65-66
• 5.4.4 Comparison between the source text and target text66-69
• 5.4.4.1 Conversion from material processes to material processes66-68
• 5.4.4.2 Process transfer caused by the English structure "get+adj"68-69
• 5.5 Summary of transitivity in the two versions69-73
• Chapter 6 Conclusions73-79
• 6.1 Major findings73-76
• 6.1.1 Similarities of transitivity in English and Chinese73-74
• 6.1.2 Differences of transitivity in English and Chinese74-75
• 6.1.3 Reasons for the similarities and differences75-76
• 6.2 Implications of this study76-77
• 6.3 Limitations of this study77
• 6.4 Suggestions for future studies77-79
• Appendix79-87
• References87-91
• Acknowledgements91-92

【相似文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 靳俊杰;;《義勇軍進行曲》及其英譯本的及物性分析[J];科技信息;2011年36期

2 潘章仙;及物性分析在描寫文體特征時的表現(xiàn)力[J];山東外語教學(xué);2003年04期

3 戴U，

本文編號：925815