從印象管理角度研究公眾人物道歉話語
發(fā)布時間：2021-10-09 18:03
道歉是人們生活中不可避免地會使用到的一種為不適當(dāng)或有危害的言行承認(rèn)錯誤,同時表示歉意的的常見言語行為。前人對這一現(xiàn)象的研究也不乏少數(shù),但最初只停留于對這一言語行為理論層面的研究,進(jìn)而逐步轉(zhuǎn)為實(shí)證性研究。其涉及領(lǐng)域相對較廣,但卻似乎始終在圍繞日常話語道歉所涉及到的的各因素如社會距離、社會權(quán)勢、冒犯程度、性別、文化等變量因素加以分析驗(yàn)證。本研究旨在突破前人對道歉話語的研究對象和手段范疇,即區(qū)別于日常話語道歉,轉(zhuǎn)而以公眾人物為研究對象,透過他們的道歉話語來剖析作為身份特殊的人物在表達(dá)歉意時所蘊(yùn)含的背后動機(jī)和特有的語言操作策略。特別是通過分析如何最低限度地降低和推卸責(zé)任的具體實(shí)施手段,以達(dá)到保全或挽回自身面子和維護(hù)自身公眾形象的目的,證明這一言語行為所體現(xiàn)的自我印象管理模式。本文以Leary和Kowalski（1990）提出的印象管理兩成分或兩過程管理模式為理論框架。由于本文是鑒于以語用學(xué)路向分析研究對象的話語現(xiàn)象,因此不涉及到對印象管理模式的測量或相關(guān)因素驗(yàn)證。具體而言,印象動機(jī)就是要研究哪些印象動機(jī)因素會驅(qū)使公眾人物去道歉；印象建構(gòu)是要研究通過哪些話語策略使得道歉方去修補(bǔ)或保持先前給予受歉...
【文章來源】：山西大學(xué)山西省
【文章頁數(shù)】：89 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The Object of the Research
1.3 The Rationale of the Research
1.4 Problems Existing in the Past Studies
1.5 The Objectives of the Research
1.6 Methodology and Data Collections
1.7 Outline of the Thesis
Chapter Two A Review of the Relevant Literature
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Approaches to the Study of an Apology
2.2.1 The Pragmatics Approach
2.2.2 The Sociological Approach
2.2.3 The Conversation Analysis Approach
2.2.4 The Psychological Approach
2.2.5 The Cross-Cultural Approach
2.3 Achievements and Limitations Existing in the Previous Studies
2.4 The Perspective of the Present Study
2.5 Summary
Chapter Three A Description of the Conceptual Framework
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Delimitation of Mundane Apology and Public Apology
3.3 Working Definitions of Genuine Apology and Ostensible Apology
3.4 A Social Psychological Approach to the Study of Public Apology
3.4.1 Impression Management(IM)
3.4.2 The two-component model of Impression Management
3.5 The Framework of the Present Study
3.5.1 Public apologies as a result of impression motivation
3.5.2 Public apology strategies as a realization of impression construction
3.6 Reasons to choose Impression Management Theory as the Theoretical Framework
3.7 Summary
Chapter Four The Analysis of Apologetic Discourse from Public Figures Basedon IM
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Impression Motivation of Apologizing
4.2.1 Maintaining self-esteem and/or saving Face
4.2.2 Avoiding responsibilities
4.2.3 Setting public-desired models
4.3 Impression Construction of Apologizing
4.3.1 Impression construction of assertive tactics for genuine apologies
4.3.2 Impression construction of defensive tactics for ostensible apologies
4.4 Summary
Chapter Five The Pragmatic Functions of Public Apologies
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Communicative functions
5.2.1 Maintaining a positive or remedying a negative impression
5.2.2 Shortening social distance and establishing intimate relationship
5.3 Instrumental functions
5.3.1 Realizing some specific discourse purpose
5.3.2 Retrieving (in-) tangible loss caused by wrongdoing
5.4 Summary
Chapter Six The Pragmatic Effects of Public Apologies
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Positive effects
6.2.1 Minimizing the face-threatening effects
6.2.2 Evading the embarrassing social situation
6.2.3 Improving and remedying the harmonious interpersonal relationship
6.3 Negative effects
6.3.1 Being suspected of the apologetic sincerity
6.3.2 Amplifying the negative public image
6.4 Zero effects
6.5 Summary
Chapter Seven Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Major Findings
7.3 Implications
7.4 Limitations
7.5 Suggestions for Further Study
Bibliography
附錄: 在校期間發(fā)表的論文
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]道歉行為的話語模式與語用特點(diǎn)分析[J]. 李軍. 語言教學(xué)與研究. 2007(01)
[2]現(xiàn)代漢語道歉言語行為策略研究[J]. 王燕,徐慧. 現(xiàn)代語文. 2006(11)
[3]漢英致歉策略在社會距離中的分布[J]. 肖涌. 西南交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版). 2005(05)
[4]對“道歉語”的語用定量研究[J]. 劉思,劉潤清. 外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2005(05)
碩士論文
[1]致歉言語行為研究[D]. 周林艷.吉林大學(xué) 2008
[2]關(guān)于現(xiàn)代漢語道歉言語行為的初步研究[D]. 康紅霞.天津師范大學(xué) 2008
[3]漢語致歉言語行為研究[D]. 胡明偉.吉林大學(xué) 2006
本文編號：3426767
【文章來源】：山西大學(xué)山西省
【文章頁數(shù)】：89 頁
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The Object of the Research
1.3 The Rationale of the Research
1.4 Problems Existing in the Past Studies
1.5 The Objectives of the Research
1.6 Methodology and Data Collections
1.7 Outline of the Thesis
Chapter Two A Review of the Relevant Literature
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Approaches to the Study of an Apology
2.2.1 The Pragmatics Approach
2.2.2 The Sociological Approach
2.2.3 The Conversation Analysis Approach
2.2.4 The Psychological Approach
2.2.5 The Cross-Cultural Approach
2.3 Achievements and Limitations Existing in the Previous Studies
2.4 The Perspective of the Present Study
2.5 Summary
Chapter Three A Description of the Conceptual Framework
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Delimitation of Mundane Apology and Public Apology
3.3 Working Definitions of Genuine Apology and Ostensible Apology
3.4 A Social Psychological Approach to the Study of Public Apology
3.4.1 Impression Management(IM)
3.4.2 The two-component model of Impression Management
3.5 The Framework of the Present Study
3.5.1 Public apologies as a result of impression motivation
3.5.2 Public apology strategies as a realization of impression construction
3.6 Reasons to choose Impression Management Theory as the Theoretical Framework
3.7 Summary
Chapter Four The Analysis of Apologetic Discourse from Public Figures Basedon IM
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Impression Motivation of Apologizing
4.2.1 Maintaining self-esteem and/or saving Face
4.2.2 Avoiding responsibilities
4.2.3 Setting public-desired models
4.3 Impression Construction of Apologizing
4.3.1 Impression construction of assertive tactics for genuine apologies
4.3.2 Impression construction of defensive tactics for ostensible apologies
4.4 Summary
Chapter Five The Pragmatic Functions of Public Apologies
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Communicative functions
5.2.1 Maintaining a positive or remedying a negative impression
5.2.2 Shortening social distance and establishing intimate relationship
5.3 Instrumental functions
5.3.1 Realizing some specific discourse purpose
5.3.2 Retrieving (in-) tangible loss caused by wrongdoing
5.4 Summary
Chapter Six The Pragmatic Effects of Public Apologies
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Positive effects
6.2.1 Minimizing the face-threatening effects
6.2.2 Evading the embarrassing social situation
6.2.3 Improving and remedying the harmonious interpersonal relationship
6.3 Negative effects
6.3.1 Being suspected of the apologetic sincerity
6.3.2 Amplifying the negative public image
6.4 Zero effects
6.5 Summary
Chapter Seven Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Major Findings
7.3 Implications
7.4 Limitations
7.5 Suggestions for Further Study
Bibliography
附錄: 在校期間發(fā)表的論文
【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]道歉行為的話語模式與語用特點(diǎn)分析[J]. 李軍. 語言教學(xué)與研究. 2007(01)
[2]現(xiàn)代漢語道歉言語行為策略研究[J]. 王燕,徐慧. 現(xiàn)代語文. 2006(11)
[3]漢英致歉策略在社會距離中的分布[J]. 肖涌. 西南交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版). 2005(05)
[4]對“道歉語”的語用定量研究[J]. 劉思,劉潤清. 外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)). 2005(05)
碩士論文
[1]致歉言語行為研究[D]. 周林艷.吉林大學(xué) 2008
[2]關(guān)于現(xiàn)代漢語道歉言語行為的初步研究[D]. 康紅霞.天津師范大學(xué) 2008
[3]漢語致歉言語行為研究[D]. 胡明偉.吉林大學(xué) 2006
本文編號：3426767
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/3426767.html
最近更新
教材專著
