【摘要】：動名變讀以非去-去為主,其中動-名型變讀蓋由既事范疇引申而來,故對結(jié)果格外關(guān)注,進(jìn)而兼及受事。在"施事-動作-工具-結(jié)果 /受事"這個認(rèn)知框架內(nèi),人的主觀注意力由結(jié)果 /受事漸次推至工具、施事,故各類語義角色的轉(zhuǎn)喻頻率表現(xiàn)為結(jié)果 /受事工具施事。這跟認(rèn)知的凸顯原則不一致。而是語法形態(tài)、主觀注意力、客體凸顯度等協(xié)同作用的結(jié)果。名-動型變讀中,動詞記錄跟名詞實體密切相關(guān)的特定及物性動作,實體在事件中充當(dāng)?shù)恼Z義角色有工具受事施事等,這一排序同樣跟認(rèn)知的凸顯原則不一致,需從認(rèn)知處理的角度闡釋。古漢語變讀系統(tǒng)中沒有結(jié)果轉(zhuǎn)喻事件的用例,這跟古漢語的語法范疇密切相關(guān)。另外動名變讀亦涉及清-濁交替,其濁聲母一讀傾向于表狀態(tài)。
[Abstract]:The change of name is mainly non-go-go, in which the dynamic-nominal variable reading cover is extended from the subject category, so the results are paid special attention to, and then both the subject and the subject are paid attention to. In the cognitive framework of "agent-action-tool-result / subject", people's subjective attention is gradually pushed from result / subject to tool, so the metonymy frequency of all kinds of semantic roles is expressed as result / subject. This is inconsistent with the principle of cognitive prominence. It is the result of the synergy of grammatical form, subjective attention and object salience. In name-to-dynamic variant reading, verb records are closely related to specific transitivity actions of noun entities, and the semantic roles played by entities in events have tools to be performed, etc. This order is also inconsistent with the prominent principle of cognition and needs to be explained from the perspective of cognitive processing. There are no use cases of metonymy events in the variant reading system of ancient Chinese, which is closely related to the grammatical category of ancient Chinese. In addition, the change of name also involves the alternation of Qing and turbid, and the first reading of turbid consonant tends to appear in the surface state.
【作者單位】： 浙江工商大學(xué)人文與傳播學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金青年項目“古漢語變讀規(guī)律及不變讀原因研究”(12CYY032);“基于句法—語義界面的漢語異讀構(gòu)詞研究”(13CYY071);國家社科基金重點項目“《經(jīng)典釋文》文獻(xiàn)與語言研究”(14ZDB097)
【分類號】：H141
，

本文編號：2499856