【摘要】：Hymes提出并分析了對(duì)Chomsky語言理論的學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng),其學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)的理據(jù)一方面基于“喬姆斯基的工作”存在的理論缺陷,語言研究途徑與方法存在不合理性;另一方面Hymes關(guān)于“社會(huì)建構(gòu)語言學(xué)”的思想主張與Chomsky的“常規(guī)語言理論”形成極度反差,二者難以彌合而產(chǎn)生沖突動(dòng)力,學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)由此產(chǎn)生。Hymes對(duì)Chomsky的學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)以《句法結(jié)構(gòu)》和《句法理論要略》為范圍,聚焦Chomsky的“語言理論”及其核心概念“語言能力”。由之,對(duì)Hymes學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)的社會(huì)語言學(xué)立場(chǎng)和人類文化語言學(xué)立論作出解釋和再評(píng)論,對(duì)Hymes在批評(píng)Chomsky語言理論過程中建立起來的“交際能力”概念以及后結(jié)構(gòu)主義對(duì)這一概念的運(yùn)用進(jìn)行再考察,均具有重要的理論價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Hymes puts forward and analyzes the academic criticism of the Chomsky language theory. On the one hand, its academic criticism is based on the theoretical defects of Chomsky's work, and the approaches and methods of language research are unreasonable. On the other hand, Hymes's idea of "social constructional linguistics" is extremely different from Chomsky's "conventional language theory", which makes it difficult to overcome the conflict between the two theories. Hymes' academic criticism of Chomsky focuses on Chomsky's "language theory" and its core concept "language competence" within the scope of "Syntax structure" and "Syntax Theory". From this point of view, the sociolinguistic position of Hymes's academic criticism and the theory of human cultural linguistics are explained and re-commented. It is of great theoretical value to re-examine the concept of "communicative competence" established by Hymes in criticizing the theory of Chomsky and the application of post-structuralism to this concept.
【作者單位】： 煙臺(tái)大學(xué)外國(guó)語學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：H0
，

本文編號(hào)：2453694