發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-01 20:30

【摘要】：作為19世紀(jì)來華傳教士學(xué)習(xí)漢語的入門材料,清代雍正年間頒行的《圣諭廣訓(xùn)》以及此后出現(xiàn)的白話衍說類文本《圣諭廣訓(xùn)衍》或《圣諭廣訓(xùn)直解》曾被多次譯成外語。一般認(rèn)為,跟《圣諭》相關(guān)的這些材料多為新教傳教士所采用,原因在于其語言風(fēng)格、宣講形式,以及道德教化內(nèi)容等,皆可以給他們對(duì)中國底層民眾的宣講策略提供"在地"的文化參照。然而,有關(guān)《圣諭廣訓(xùn)》的學(xué)習(xí)材料也曾出現(xiàn)在天主教傳教士編選的中文—拉丁文對(duì)照學(xué)習(xí)課程中,這是前人研究中未曾討論到的。在19世紀(jì)中后期擔(dān)任上海徐匯公學(xué)教務(wù)長的意大利籍耶穌會(huì)士晁德蒞(Angelo Zottoli)編寫的五卷本Cursus Litteraturae Sinicae(《中國文化教程》,1879~1883)中,雍正年間的白話文《圣諭廣訓(xùn)衍》全本十六條被譯成拉丁文位列首卷首篇。這一學(xué)習(xí)路徑與此前16至18世紀(jì)來華的天主教傳教士對(duì)中國傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)典的側(cè)重有著策略上的區(qū)別�！吨袊幕坛獭返淖珜�,其歷史背景與19世紀(jì)70年代以上海徐家匯為中心的新耶穌會(huì)士所創(chuàng)設(shè)的"江南科學(xué)計(jì)劃"緊密相關(guān)。其中,晁德蒞負(fù)責(zé)漢學(xué)部分,為新來的天主教傳教士提供漢語學(xué)習(xí)的課程讀物。本文進(jìn)一步探討了晁德蒞《中國文化教程》的文本布局與19世紀(jì)后期新耶穌會(huì)士的傳教策略可能存在的聯(lián)系。
[Abstract]:As an introduction to the study of Chinese by missionaries in China in the 19th century, the oracle training issued by Yongzheng in the Qing Dynasty and the vernacular derivative texts "oracle broad instruction" or "oracle broad training and direct interpretation" have been translated into foreign languages many times. It is generally believed that most of these materials related to the "oracle" are used by Protestant missionaries because of their language style, the form of preaching, and the content of moral education, and so on. All of them can provide them with a cultural reference to their propaganda strategies for the Chinese people at the bottom of the country. However, the learning materials about the oracle have also appeared in the Chinese-Latin comparative study courses compiled by Catholic missionaries, which have not been discussed in previous studies. In the five-volume Cursus Litteraturae Sinicae (of the course of Chinese Culture, 1879 / 1883, written by the Italian Jesuit Chaode-to-(Angelo Zottoli), who served as the Provost of Xuhui State School in Shanghai in the mid-and late 19th century, Yongzheng's vernacular oracle is translated into Latin at the beginning of the first volume. This path of learning differs from the emphasis placed by Catholic missionaries who came to China from the 16th to 18th centuries on the traditional Chinese classics. The Writing of the course of Chinese Culture is different from that of the former Catholic missionaries in the 16th and 18th centuries. Its historical background is closely related to the "Jiangnan Science Plan" created by the New Jesuits, whose center is Shanghai Xujiahui in the 1970s. Among them, Chao Deqi was in charge of the Sinology section, providing new Catholic missionaries with Chinese learning courses. This paper further discusses the possible relationship between the text layout of Chao Dezhi's Chinese Culture course and the missionary tactics of the New Jesuits in the late 19th century.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【基金】：國家社科基金一般資助項(xiàng)目(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào):15BZS088)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：H195.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧云鄉(xiāng);《圣諭廣訓(xùn)》[J];中國文化;1997年Z1期

2 司佳;;傳教士緣何研習(xí)《圣諭廣訓(xùn)》:美國衛(wèi)三畏家族檔案手稿所見一斑[J];史林;2013年03期

3 袁進(jìn);;近代演說與傳教士[J];中國文學(xué)研究(輯刊);2009年02期

4 鄭永華;;清代推行教化與治理民間教門之關(guān)系試探[J];北京歷史文化研究;2007年02期

5 揚(yáng)之水;;也抄一段白話[J];讀書;1992年09期

6 張瑞泉;略論清代的鄉(xiāng)村教化[J];史學(xué)集刊;1994年03期

7 袁進(jìn);;中國近代演說與傳教[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

8 劉景憲;自學(xué)滿語教材(十九)[J];滿語研究;1994年02期

9 茍德儀;;清季教官的宣講與地方教化——兼及科舉制廢除對(duì)教官的影響[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期

10 陳剩勇;清代社學(xué)與中國古代官辦初等教育體制[J];歷史研究;1995年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 鄭永華;;清代推行教化與治理民間教門之關(guān)系試探[A];北京歷史文化研究——北京史專題研究[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 雪珥;偏愛“宣講”的帝國[N];中國經(jīng)營報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 雷偉平;《圣諭廣訓(xùn)》傳播研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

2 婁玲敏;清代《圣諭廣訓(xùn)》在西南少數(shù)民族地區(qū)的傳播與影響[D];云南大學(xué);2014年

3 張艷珍;《圣諭廣訓(xùn)衍》語氣詞研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：2451886