【摘要】：塞爾和范德維肯等人設(shè)想并構(gòu)建了一個(gè)可用于具體言語(yǔ)行為形式化的語(yǔ)用邏輯系統(tǒng),然而,他們對(duì)于言語(yǔ)行為以及語(yǔ)用力量的分類卻存在著含混、互相包含的缺陷。從漢語(yǔ)中單字句的獨(dú)特語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象的視角重新審視語(yǔ)用邏輯體系,可以得出以下結(jié)論:(1)對(duì)于單字句的言語(yǔ)行為的關(guān)注與研究,彌補(bǔ)了只以句子為基本分析單位的不足,提出了新的研究對(duì)象,極大地?cái)U(kuò)展了塞爾等人所倡導(dǎo)的言語(yǔ)行為理論研究的視野以及研究領(lǐng)域。(2)許多單字式行為式動(dòng)詞并不僅僅對(duì)應(yīng)著一個(gè)確定的語(yǔ)用力量,相反,它們代表著一種獨(dú)特的類。(3)通過(guò)單字句可以看出實(shí)際認(rèn)知過(guò)程中語(yǔ)用力量的七種要素的重要程度不盡相同。
[Abstract]:Searle and van der Viken have conceived and constructed a pragmatic logic system which can be used in the formalization of specific speech acts. However, their classification of speech acts and pragmatic power has some defects such as ambiguity and mutual inclusion. Reviewing the pragmatic logic system from the perspective of the unique linguistic phenomena of single-character sentences in Chinese, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) the focus and research on the speech acts of single-character sentences make up for the deficiency of only taking sentences as the basic unit of analysis; A new research object is proposed, which greatly expands the perspective and research field of speech act theory advocated by Searle et al. (2) many monographs do not only correspond to a certain pragmatic force, but on the contrary. They represent a unique class. (3) it can be seen that the seven elements of pragmatic power in the actual cognitive process are of different importance through single-character sentences.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：教育部人文基地重大項(xiàng)目(13JJD720018) 國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(15BZX082),國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(14ZDB013)
【分類號(hào)】：H0-05
，

本文編號(hào)：2351784