【摘要】：《尚書》是我國最早的一部政史文獻(xiàn)匯編,記錄了距今四千年至兩千六百多年間虞、夏、商、周的典、訓(xùn)、誥、誓、命,涉及政治、思想、宗教、哲學(xué)、法律、地理、歷史、軍事等領(lǐng)域,范圍很廣。但因其內(nèi)容詰屈聱牙,歷代對其研究和注釋的著述不勝枚舉。在清代,王鳴盛畢其一生著成《尚書后案》,其與江聲的《尚書集注音疏》及孫星衍的《尚書今古文注疏》形成三足鼎立的局面,三者都是研究清代《尚書》學(xué)和訓(xùn)詁學(xué)不可缺少的著作。本文就以王鳴盛的《尚書后案》為研究對象。鑒于前人多重視王鳴盛的史學(xué)成就,而對其經(jīng)學(xué)著作《尚書后案》研究甚少,更遑論從訓(xùn)詁學(xué)角度進(jìn)行全面、系統(tǒng)地研究。筆者在熟讀《尚書后案》的基礎(chǔ)上,又參考前修時賢的各種著作,現(xiàn)對《尚書后案》的訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容、訓(xùn)詁方法、訓(xùn)詁特色以及訓(xùn)詁不足等進(jìn)行初步研究。本論文共分為以下五個部分：緒論主要介紹王鳴盛生平及《尚書后案》相關(guān)情況,分析《尚書后案》的研究現(xiàn)狀與本課題的研究意義和研究方法。第一章《尚書后案》訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容。共分為五大類,分別是辨用字、作�？�、注音和釋詞、訓(xùn)修辭、闡釋文意、說明典章制度和名物地理等狀況。每個大類又劃分為不同小類,對于每一小類都進(jìn)行了舉例,分析說明。第二章《尚書后案》訓(xùn)詁方法。共分為兩大類,前一類指傳統(tǒng)訓(xùn)詁學(xué)提到的一般方法,包括以形索義、因聲求義和直陳詞義。后一類指根據(jù)《尚書后案》具體情況總結(jié)出的五種訓(xùn)詁方法,包括方言印證、金石證義、以史明義、因文考義和類比釋義。對于每一種訓(xùn)詁方法的運(yùn)用都進(jìn)行舉例說明。第三章《尚書后案》訓(xùn)詁特色。共分為六點(diǎn),一是無征不信,論必有據(jù)；二是旁征博引,取材廣泛；三是嚴(yán)守師法,求真求實(shí)；四是以簡馭繁,嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)踏實(shí)；五是小學(xué)為本,述而不作；六是金石校文,經(jīng)史參證。第四章《尚書后案》訓(xùn)詁不足。一是在訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容上：逞博煩瑣,缺乏新解；二是在思想觀念上：惟漢是從,凡古必是。過于推崇鄭學(xué),而對其他學(xué)者著述上的缺失,批評過于激烈。
[Abstract]:"Shang Shu" is the earliest collection of political history documents in China, recording the codes, instructions, letters, oaths, orders of Yu, Xia, Shang and Zhou from four thousand to 2600 years ago, involving politics, thought, religion, philosophy, law, geography, history, The military and other fields are very broad in scope. But because of its tortuous content, its research and notes have been endless. In the Qing Dynasty, Wang Ming-sheng completed his lifetime work "the case after Shang Shu", which formed a three-legged situation with Jiang Sheng's "Shang Shu Collection" and Sun Xingyan's "Shang Shu present and Ancient Writing Notes". The three are indispensable works for the study of Shang Shu and Exegetics in Qing Dynasty. This article takes Wang Mingsheng's case after Shang Shu as the research object. In view of the fact that most predecessors attached importance to Wang Ming-sheng 's achievements in historiography, there were few studies on his classics, "the case after the Shang Shu", let alone a comprehensive and systematic study from the angle of exegetics. On the basis of reading "the case after Shang Shu", and referring to various works by the former scholars, the author makes a preliminary study on the exegetical contents, exegesis methods, exegetical characteristics and insufficient exegetics. This thesis is divided into the following five parts: the introduction mainly introduces Wang Mingsheng's life and the relevant situation of "the case after Shang Shu", analyzes the research status quo and the research significance and research method of this subject. Chapter one, the case after Shang Shu, exegesis. It is divided into five categories, namely, distinguishing characters, collating, preaching and interpreting words, admonishing rhetoric, explaining literary meaning, explaining the system of rules and regulations and the geography of famous things and so on. Each large class is divided into different subclasses. Examples are given for each subclass. The second chapter, the case after Shang Shu, exegesis method. The former refers to the general methods mentioned in the traditional exegetics, including the form of meaning, the sound of meaning and the direct meaning of words. The latter refers to five exegetical methods summarized according to the concrete situation of "Shangshu", including dialect verification, Jinshi synonymous meaning, Shi Mingyi, textual meaning and analogical interpretation. Examples are given for the use of each exegesis method. Chapter three: the Exegetical characteristics of the case after Shang Shu. There are six points in total, one is whether one does not sign or not, the other is that there must be evidence; the second is to draw extensively from other materials; the third is to strictly observe the teacher's laws and seek truth; the fourth is to be simple and complex, rigorous and practical; fifthly, the primary school is based on the principle of saying it, but not to do it; and the sixth is to study the text of the Jinshi School. Through the history of reference. The fourth chapter "the case after Shang Shu" is insufficient in exegesis. The first is in the exegesis content: it is complicated, lack of new understanding; second, in the idea: but Han is from, every ancient must be. Too much praise Zheng Xue, and other scholars on the lack of writing, the criticism is too fierce.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 袁麗平;段玉裁《詩經(jīng)小學(xué)》訓(xùn)詁研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2013年

2 謝志平;黃式三《論語后案》訓(xùn)詁研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

3 王雁;孔穎達(dá)《五經(jīng)正義》訓(xùn)詁研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2008年

4 尹燁;《尚書今古文注疏》訓(xùn)詁研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2008年

5 劉勇;清人《尚書》訓(xùn)詁方法研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2149607