本文選題：正反問句 + 非疑問用法��； 參考：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本研究是對(duì)漢語(yǔ)普通話兒童習(xí)得正反問句的實(shí)證研究。正反問句(A-not-A questions)是漢語(yǔ)特有的一種疑問句形式,它包括正反兩部分,人們只需要選擇其中一部分來進(jìn)行回答。許多學(xué)者認(rèn)為如果疑問詞出現(xiàn)在正反問句的賓語(yǔ)位置,那么疑問詞就失去了疑問含義,表示不定指。跟蹤調(diào)查研究發(fā)現(xiàn)兒童習(xí)得正反問句晚于其他類型的問句,而目前關(guān)于正反問句的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究少之又少。本研究包括三個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)。實(shí)驗(yàn)一中使用問答任務(wù),模仿任務(wù)和誘導(dǎo)產(chǎn)出任務(wù)來測(cè)試兒童何時(shí)習(xí)得正反問句。結(jié)果表明,從三歲開始,兒童就出現(xiàn)了與成人類似的表現(xiàn)。因此至少?gòu)娜龤q開始,兒童就習(xí)得了正反問句。實(shí)驗(yàn)二驗(yàn)證兒童是否把正反問句的疑問詞視作非疑問用法。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)從三歲開始,兒童就與成人的表現(xiàn)類似。他們把處于正反問句賓語(yǔ)位置的'什么'視為疑問用法。為了進(jìn)一步考察兒童是否把正反問句賓語(yǔ)位置的'什么'視為非疑問用法,實(shí)驗(yàn)三用問答任務(wù)來進(jìn)行測(cè)試兒童,例如,小熊是不是買了什么?實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果表明盡管兒童和成人不能給出一致的回答,但是他們的確意識(shí)到這類測(cè)試句是復(fù)合句。實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果證明了受試把正反問句賓語(yǔ)位置的疑問詞視作疑問用法而不是非疑問用法。目前的發(fā)現(xiàn)表明:從三歲起,兒童習(xí)得正反問句并且把處于正反問句賓語(yǔ)位置的疑問詞解讀為疑問用法。
[Abstract]:This study is an empirical study of Chinese Putonghua children's acquisition of positive and negative questions. Positive and rhetorical question (A-not-A questions) is a unique form of interrogative sentence in Chinese. It consists of positive and negative parts, and people only need to choose one of them to answer. Many scholars believe that if interrogative words appear in the position of object of positive and negative questions, interrogative words lose the meaning of doubt and indicate indeterminacy. A follow-up study shows that children acquire positive and negative questions later than other types of questions, but there are very few experimental studies on positive and negative questions at present. This study includes three experiments. In experiment one, a question-answering task, a mimic task and an induction task were used to test when a child acquires positive rhetorical sentences. The results showed that from the age of three, children showed similar performance as adults. So at least from the age of three, children acquire positive and negative questions. Experiment 2 verifies whether children regard the interrogative words of positive and negative questions as non-interrogative. The results showed that children and adults performed similarly from the age of three. They regard 'what' in the position of object of a positive or negative question as a interrogative usage. In order to further investigate whether children regard the 'what' of the position of the object of the positive and rhetorical question as a non-interrogative use, the third experiment uses a question and answer task to test the child. For example, did the bear buy something? The results show that although children and adults do not give consistent answers, they do realize that such test sentences are compound sentences. The experimental results show that the interrogative words in the position of object in positive and rhetorical questions are regarded as interrogative rather than non-interrogative. Current findings show that children have learned positive and rhetorical sentences from the age of three and interpreted interrogative words in the position of object of positive and rhetorical questions as interrogative usage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H193.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 繆小春;幼兒對(duì)疑問詞的理解——幼兒回答特殊疑問句的發(fā)展特點(diǎn)[J];心理科學(xué)通訊;1986年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2074003