本文選題：衡陽(yáng)方言 + 比喻句　； 參考：《云南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句為研究對(duì)象,運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)資料法、田野調(diào)查法、系統(tǒng)分析法等多種方法,廣泛搜集語(yǔ)言事實(shí),并對(duì)豐富的語(yǔ)言事實(shí)進(jìn)行認(rèn)真的描寫,運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)分析、比較和歸納的方法,從不同的角度對(duì)衡陽(yáng)方言的比喻句式進(jìn)行分析研究。正文一共分為以下六個(gè)部分。緒論部分。概述了衡陽(yáng)城市情況、衡陽(yáng)方言情況,相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的研究現(xiàn)狀�；诤怅�(yáng)方言比喻句式研究的薄弱,因此本論文試圖運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)法與田野調(diào)查法對(duì)衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句式進(jìn)行較為系統(tǒng)的探討。由于衡陽(yáng)方言類的文本資料較少,因此本文大部分都是以方言口語(yǔ)為研究語(yǔ)料,本文重點(diǎn)是對(duì)一些有典型性、有代表性的比喻句語(yǔ)料進(jìn)行歸納分析,從中發(fā)現(xiàn)并總結(jié)出衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句在日常使用上的一些規(guī)律。第一章,較全面地總結(jié)了衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句中的比喻要素,從本體、喻體選擇、比喻詞選擇和相似點(diǎn)選擇四個(gè)方面來(lái)分析比喻要素。從喻體類型與喻體特征兩個(gè)方面來(lái)分析喻體的選擇。喻體選擇總結(jié)出衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句的喻體主要類型有動(dòng)植物類、飲食類、生產(chǎn)生活類、身體器官類和地方特色類五種。同時(shí)總結(jié)出喻體特征主要有鮮明地域性、世俗鄙瑣性、相對(duì)穩(wěn)定性、直觀世俗性、模糊意象性五種。比喻詞選擇則從明喻和暗喻兩個(gè)大類上來(lái)分析喻詞的選擇。衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句相似點(diǎn)從顯性和隱性兩個(gè)角度進(jìn)行分析總結(jié)。第二章,重點(diǎn)分析了衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句的基本結(jié)構(gòu)和辭格結(jié)構(gòu)。根據(jù)比喻三大基本類型,即明喻、暗喻、借喻,對(duì)衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句的結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行總結(jié)分析。明喻比喻句從主謂式、偏正式兩種類型去總結(jié)分析;暗喻從主謂式、偏正式兩種類型去總結(jié)分析;借喻則是從方言詞語(yǔ)喻體、熟語(yǔ)喻體和句子喻體三種喻體類型上舉例說(shuō)明。第三章,探析衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句變式類型。對(duì)衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句中特殊的較喻、倒喻、否喻和博喻四種比喻變式進(jìn)行探析。較喻從強(qiáng)喻、弱喻、等喻三個(gè)類型去分析,強(qiáng)喻、弱喻、等喻中又分別總結(jié)出不同的句式結(jié)構(gòu)。倒喻也總結(jié)了兩個(gè)不同的句式結(jié)構(gòu)。否喻則概括為肯定本體、否定喻體和否定喻體、肯定本體兩種結(jié)構(gòu)情況。博喻則總結(jié)出喻體完全不同和在前一喻體的基礎(chǔ)上補(bǔ)充兩大類。第四章,論文以夸喻、擬喻、通感與比喻兼用三種情況來(lái)總結(jié)分析衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句修辭綜合運(yùn)用,夸喻與擬喻都是以兼用與連用的使用情況劃分,也對(duì)衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句中這三種辭格綜合運(yùn)用情況進(jìn)行了總結(jié)劃分并具體分析�？偨Y(jié)全文。對(duì)全文研究?jī)?nèi)容進(jìn)行概括梳理,反思行文中的不足之處,對(duì)下一階段的研究提出展望。
[Abstract]:Taking the figurative sentence of Hengyang dialect as the object of study, this paper uses the methods of literature, field investigation, system analysis and other methods to collect the linguistic facts extensively, and describes the rich linguistic facts carefully and makes use of statistical analysis. The comparative and inductive methods are used to analyze the figurative sentence patterns of Hengyang dialect from different angles. The text is divided into the following six parts. Introduction. Summarized Hengyang city situation, Hengyang dialect situation, related field research status. Based on the weak study of the figurative sentence pattern in Hengyang dialect, this paper attempts to make a systematic study of the metaphorical sentence pattern in Hengyang dialect by using literature and field investigation. Because of the lack of textual data of Hengyang dialect, most of this paper is based on the spoken language of dialect. The emphasis of this paper is to sum up and analyze some typical and representative metaphorical sentence materials. Find and summarize some rules of Hengyang dialect metaphorical sentence in daily use. The first chapter summarizes the metaphorical elements in Hengyang dialect and analyzes the metaphorical elements from four aspects: Noumenon, vehicle selection, metaphorical choice and similarity selection. The choice of the vehicle is analyzed from two aspects: the type of the vehicle and the characteristics of the vehicle. The main types of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect are animal and plant, diet, production and life, body organs and local characteristics. At the same time, it concludes that there are five main characteristics of the vehicle: regional, secular, relatively stable, intuitive and secular, fuzzy image. The choice of metaphorical words is analyzed from two categories: metonymy and metonymy. The similarities of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect are analyzed and summarized from two angles: explicit and recessive. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of Hengyang dialect figurative sentence basic structure and rhetorical structure. According to the three basic types of metaphor, that is, similes, metaphors and metaphors, the structure of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect is summarized and analyzed. Metonymy metaphorical sentences are summed up and analyzed from subject-predicate type, partial formal two types; metonymy from subject-predicate type, partial formal two types to sum up and analyze; metonymy is illustrated by examples from three types of dialect words and expressions, idiomatic vehicles and sentence metaphors. The third chapter, analyzes the Hengyang dialect metaphorical sentence variant type. This paper probes into the special metaphorical, inverted, non-metonymy and Boyu metaphorical variations in the figurative sentences of Hengyang dialect. There are three types of metonymy: strong metaphor, weak metaphor, and so on. Inverted metaphors also sum up two different sentence structures. Non-metaphor is summed up as positive Noumenon, negation, affirmation of Noumenon. Boyu sums up two categories: completely different vehicles and two kinds of supplement on the basis of the former one. In the fourth chapter, the thesis summarizes and analyzes the comprehensive use of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect by using three kinds of cases: Kua Yu, pseudonymy, synaesthesia and metaphor. It also summarizes and classifies the comprehensive application of these three rhetorical cases in the figurative sentences of Hengyang dialect and analyzes them concretely. Summary of the full text. This paper summarizes the content of the full text, reflects on the shortcomings of the text, and puts forward a prospect for the next stage of the study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H174

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣純捷;衡陽(yáng)方言中的“滿”[J];高等函授學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

2 彭蘭玉;衡陽(yáng)方言的語(yǔ)氣詞[J];方言;2003年02期

3 申瑩瑩;;衡陽(yáng)方言中的否定詞[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊;2010年05期

4 劉偉民;衡陽(yáng)方言的“下”字[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年S2期

5 阿蘭·佩羅貝 ,洛朗·沙加爾 ,羅仁攜;《衡陽(yáng)方言》評(píng)介[J];湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年04期

6 陳媛媛;;衡陽(yáng)方言中的“噠”[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2008年06期

7 唐艷;;衡陽(yáng)方言諺語(yǔ)與當(dāng)?shù)剞r(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)文化特征探究[J];大眾文藝(理論);2009年17期

8 李亞娜;;衡陽(yáng)方言諺語(yǔ)與當(dāng)?shù)氐赜蛭幕痆J];時(shí)代文學(xué)(下半月);2014年01期

9 曾春花;李成兵;;湖南衡陽(yáng)方言副詞論略[J];現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)文(語(yǔ)言研究版);2008年05期

10 彭蘭玉;衡陽(yáng)方言的程度表示法[J];衡陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2003年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 彭蘭玉;衡陽(yáng)方言語(yǔ)法研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 唐茜;衡陽(yáng)方言比喻句式研究[D];云南師范大學(xué);2017年

2 謝紅;衡陽(yáng)方言常用量詞的變異與變化研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

3 李暉旭;衡陽(yáng)方言青少年語(yǔ)音的社會(huì)語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2007年

4 黃玉蓮;衡陽(yáng)方言假聲研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2013年

5 申瑩瑩;衡陽(yáng)方言副詞研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2011年

6 張艷;衡陽(yáng)方言的親昵稱謂語(yǔ)和冒犯稱謂語(yǔ)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2013年

7 肖瀟;衡陽(yáng)方言中的古入聲字研究[D];西南民族大學(xué);2013年

8 劉靜;衡陽(yáng)和湘潭市區(qū)方言聲調(diào)實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1935266