本文選題：華澳大語系　切入點：突厥語族　出處：《語言研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：邢公畹教授1993年提出語義學比較法即“深層對應比較法”后,在漢語、侗臺語、苗瑤語、藏緬語之間進行了成功的試探。近年來筆者也在漢藏語和突厥語之間進行了試探,找到了大量深層語義對應的例證。在這一研究過程中,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)了一條華澳大語系歷史音變的重要規(guī)律——后墊流音和諧律:在后墊流音存在的條件下,舌面后音韻尾可以和舌尖前音韻尾對應。這樣就把大量語詞納入了語音對應和深層語義對應之中。邢公畹和鄭張尚芳兩先生根據(jù)漢藏語和南島語之間的語音對應規(guī)律提出了華澳大語系假說。由于在漢藏語和阿爾泰語之間存在大量的相異之處,我們覺得與其把二者之間的深層對應看作發(fā)生學關系,不如看作“詞源學關系”。這是今后要加強研究的重大語言學課題。
[Abstract]:Professor Xing Gongwan put forward the comparative method of semantics in 1993, that is, "deep correspondence comparative method", and made a successful trial between Chinese, Dong and Tai languages, Miao Yao language and Tibetan and Burmese languages.In recent years, I have also explored the relationship between Chinese and Tibetan and Turkic, and found a lot of examples of deep semantic correspondence.In the course of this study, we have found an important rule of historical phonetic change in the Chinese and Australian language system, namely, the harmonious law of the backward flow sound: under the condition of the existence of the back cushion flow sound, the phonetic tail of the tongue can correspond to the antecedent end of the tongue tip.In this way, a large number of words are brought into the phonological correspondence and deep semantic correspondence.Xing Gongwan and Zhang Shangfang put forward the hypothesis of Hua-ao language system according to the phonetic correspondence between Chinese and Tibetan languages and Nandao language.Since there are a lot of differences between Chinese and Tibetan and Altay, we think that the deep correspondence between them is better than that of etymology.This is a major linguistic subject to be studied in the future.
【作者單位】： 貴州師范學院山地民族研究所;
【分類號】：H4;;H63
，

本文編號：1695800