本文關(guān)鍵詞：論合作原則及其準(zhǔn)則　出處：《華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2016年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 合作原則 準(zhǔn)則 相關(guān) 會(huì)話涵義

【摘要】：格賴斯的合作原則理論給人們從會(huì)話角度分析日常語(yǔ)言提供了某些理論依據(jù),但套用康德的范疇分類法給合作準(zhǔn)則分類并不合適。言者提供了多余或欠缺的信息、說假話或表達(dá)不清楚不一定是不合作或要傳達(dá)某種會(huì)話涵義。量、質(zhì)、方式準(zhǔn)則更像是一種社會(huì)、道德的要求而非普遍有效的會(huì)話規(guī)則。合作原則的基本精神是會(huì)話相關(guān)。就會(huì)話涵義的推出看,會(huì)話不相關(guān)的實(shí)質(zhì)是表達(dá)者的話不符合正常會(huì)話的慣例。利奇的"禮貌原則"沿著格賴斯的錯(cuò)誤方向走得更遠(yuǎn),列文森的會(huì)話涵義三原則并非談合作原則,關(guān)聯(lián)理論之"關(guān)聯(lián)"與合作原則不是一個(gè)概念。
[Abstract]:Grice's cooperative principle theory provides some theoretical basis for the analysis of everyday language from the perspective of conversation. But it is not appropriate to use Kant's categorical classification to classify the cooperative criteria. The speaker provides redundant or lacking information, saying false words or expressing inclearly is not necessarily uncooperative or to convey a certain conversational meaning, quantity, quality. The principle of mode is more like a social, moral requirement than a universally effective conversational rule. The basic spirit of the principle of cooperation is conversational correlation. The essence of irrelevant conversation is that the speaker's words do not conform to the convention of normal conversation. Leech's "Politeness principle" goes further along Grice's wrong direction, and Levinson's three principles of conversational meaning are not talking about the principle of cooperation. The relevance of relevance theory and the principle of cooperation are not a concept.
【作者單位】： 華南師范大學(xué)政治與行政學(xué)院;
【基金】：廣東省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“現(xiàn)代邏輯視野中的當(dāng)代真理論研究”(GD11XZX017)
【分類號(hào)】：H0-05
【正文快照】： 格賴斯于1967年在哈佛大學(xué)的演講中提出了著名的合作原則與會(huì)話涵義理論。1975年,他把此次演講以《邏輯與會(huì)話》為題作為論文發(fā)表,由此極大地推動(dòng)了學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)日常語(yǔ)言涵義的研究并對(duì)現(xiàn)代哲學(xué)與現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)言學(xué)產(chǎn)生了較大的影響。然而,從邏輯上考察格賴斯的合作原則各準(zhǔn)則,其問題也是，

本文編號(hào)：1419772