【摘要】： 關(guān)于西周雅樂是“商”聲或是“商”調(diào)的問題,古今學(xué)者都有論及。認(rèn)為西周雅樂無“商”聲的要從漢代的鄭玄開始,唐代的賈公顏進(jìn)行注疏的時候依舊延續(xù)鄭玄之意。此說影響甚大,以至于后世有相當(dāng)一部分學(xué)者都確信西周雅樂無“商”聲,再加上大量西周早期編鐘的出土,客觀的無“商”聲的測音數(shù)據(jù)讓更多人堅信了西周雅樂無“商”聲的史實。但是,清代的解經(jīng)家們像孫詒讓、孔光森、李光地等人看到了此說的破綻之處,并提出西周雅樂并非無“商”聲,乃無“商”調(diào)的看法,近人黃翔鵬亦同意此說。但是,一涉及西周編鐘之所以無“商”聲的原因的時候,多數(shù)學(xué)者將西周編鐘無“商”聲的原因都不可避免的歸結(jié)于政治原因,并無涉及其它可能會造成西周編鐘無“商”聲的原因。筆者欲根據(jù)前人的研究成果,通過重新整理歷史文獻(xiàn),運(yùn)用考古學(xué)上的最新成果,對“商”聲、“商”調(diào)之爭作進(jìn)一步的闡釋和考證,并試圖重新解釋無“商”的重要原因。
[Abstract]:Ancient and modern scholars have talked about whether the western Zhou Dynasty's elegant music is a "Shang" sound or a "Shang" tone. It is believed that the sound of "Shang" in the Western Zhou Dynasty should start from Zheng Xuan in the Han Dynasty, and that Jia Guangyan of the Tang Dynasty still continued Zheng Xuan's idea when he was annotated. The influence of this theory was so great that a considerable number of scholars in later generations were convinced that there was no "Shang" sound in the elegant music of the Western Zhou Dynasty, coupled with a large number of bells unearthed in the early Western Zhou Dynasty. The objective data of non-quotient sound make more people believe in the historical facts of the non-Shang sound of the Western Zhou Dynasty. However, in the Qing Dynasty, scholars like Sun Yi-Jean, Kong Guangsen, Li Guangdi and others saw the flaws in this theory, and put forward the view that the Western Zhou Yale was not without the "Shang" sound, but without the "Shang" tone. Huang Xiangpeng, a modern person, also agreed with this view. However, when it comes to the reason why there was no "Shang" in the Western Zhou Dynasty, most scholars attributed the reasons for the absence of "Shang" to the political reasons. There are no other possible reasons why the bell of the Western Zhou Dynasty did not sound "Shang". According to the previous research results, by rearranging the historical documents and using the latest results in archaeology, the author intends to further explain and verify the argument of "Shang" and "Shang", and try to reexplain the important reasons why there is no "quotient".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國藝術(shù)研究院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：J609.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 華云剛;;從《鶯鶯傳》到《西廂記》的詩歌演變[J];劍南文學(xué)(經(jīng)典教苑);2011年01期

2 孫穎;;張炎《詞源》宮調(diào)研究[J];藝術(shù)教育;2011年07期

3 劉尊明;李志麗;;唐五代詞中的“小夜曲”——《更漏子》[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

4 徐麗麗;;丁}瞪⑶陳踇J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 記者 管麗雅;“保障代理”更保障 企業(yè)用工更輕松[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日報;2000年

2 高峰 劉衛(wèi)華 楊建杰;“紅肩章”：“Y”字軍中難有作為嗎？[N];中國國防報;2002年

3 劉峽;黃埔口岸小轎車進(jìn)口同比增兩成[N];中國機(jī)電日報;2002年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 任飛;論“商”聲與“商”調(diào)[D];中國藝術(shù)研究院;2008年

，

本文編號：2242703