本文選題：西夏　切入點(diǎn)：彌勒信仰　出處：《敦煌學(xué)輯刊》2017年03期

【摘要】：講經(jīng)文作為佛教講經(jīng)之底本,保存有很多講經(jīng)活動(dòng)的珍貴資料,這在敦煌出土的大量講經(jīng)文中多有體現(xiàn)。《俄藏黑水城文獻(xiàn)》第四冊(cè)中有一件被定名為《彌勒上生經(jīng)講經(jīng)文》的文獻(xiàn),在將其與敦煌講經(jīng)文比較后可以看出,它于內(nèi)容和格式上均不符合講經(jīng)文的特點(diǎn),因此將其判定為講經(jīng)文似乎欠妥。文末被原書(shū)敘錄定義為"雜寫(xiě)"的"小石花心動(dòng)"五字也非為雜寫(xiě),而應(yīng)是這件文獻(xiàn)實(shí)際體裁的標(biāo)識(shí)語(yǔ)。因此,黑城本《彌勒上生經(jīng)講經(jīng)文》的定名并不準(zhǔn)確,它更像是作者在念佛之余,以經(jīng)文為歌辭的一首詞曲作品。
[Abstract]:As the foundation of the Buddhist scriptures, the preaching scriptures keep a lot of precious materials for the lecture activities.Many of these lectures unearthed in Dunhuang are reflected in many of them. In the fourth volume of Blackwater City in Otsang, there is a document named "Maitreya Shangsheng Scripture," which can be seen after comparing it with the text spoken in Dunhuang.It does not accord with the characteristics of speaking text in content and format, so it seems improper to judge it as speaking text.At the end of the paper, the five characters of "small Shihua Heart", defined as "miscellaneous writing" by the original narration, are not miscellaneous writing, but should be the identifier of the actual genre of this document.Therefore, the title of "Maitreya Scripture" is not accurate, it is more like a song written by the author while chanting the Buddha.
【作者單位】： 蘭州大學(xué)敦煌學(xué)研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“西夏文學(xué)文獻(xiàn)整理研究”(17CZW039) 蘭州大學(xué)中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)項(xiàng)目“敦煌與絲綢之路研究”(17LZUJBWTD003)
【分類號(hào)】：J609.2;K870.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1703717