本文選題：次承租人 + 優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)　； 參考：《中南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：伴隨房屋租賃市場(chǎng)的逐步發(fā)展以及流動(dòng)人口的加劇,房屋轉(zhuǎn)租現(xiàn)象也越來(lái)越普遍。在房屋租賃關(guān)系中,次承租人權(quán)利的保護(hù)顯得比較薄弱,而次承租人是租賃房屋的實(shí)際占有、使用人,利益最容易受到侵害。在司法實(shí)務(wù)中,次承租人要求行使優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)的案件屢有發(fā)生,但是法律對(duì)次承租優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)以及行使條件等問(wèn)題沒(méi)有具體的規(guī)定,因此在案件處理上也有所差異。本文結(jié)合同心裝飾公司起訴行使優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)一案,對(duì)次承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)的相關(guān)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析闡述,希望能對(duì)正確處理這類案件有所幫助。 本文的結(jié)構(gòu)如下：第一章簡(jiǎn)要介紹同心公司優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)案的基本案情,并通過(guò)對(duì)案情的分析歸納出案件存在的兩個(gè)爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn),即同心裝飾公司是否是合法承租人以及其是否享有房屋優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)這兩個(gè)爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)；第二章對(duì)第一章所歸納的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)進(jìn)行法理分析,首先通過(guò)對(duì)涉案當(dāng)事人之間的法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行梳理分析,結(jié)合相關(guān)法律條文以及法學(xué)理論,得出同心裝飾公司是合法承租人的結(jié)論,其次是從優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)制度的價(jià)值來(lái)論證次承租人享有優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)的合理性；第三章主要探討在司法實(shí)務(wù)中處理次承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)糾紛容易遇到的一些問(wèn)題,這一章所涉及到的問(wèn)題主要是次承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)所具有-些特殊問(wèn)題,即在通知義務(wù)、優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)競(jìng)合等方面與承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)所不同之處。
[Abstract]:With the gradual development of housing rental market and the aggravation of floating population, the phenomenon of house sublease is becoming more and more common. The protection of the sub-lessee 's rights is weak in the rental relationship, but the sub-lessee is the real occupant of the leased house, the user is the most vulnerable to infringement. In judicial practice, there are many cases in which the sub-lessee requests to exercise the preemption right, but the law has no specific provisions on the sub-tenancy preemption right and the exercise conditions, so there are some differences in the handling of cases. Combined with the case of concentric decoration company suing the exercise of preemption right, this paper analyzes and expounds the relative problems of sub-lessee 's preemptive right, hoping that it will be helpful to deal with this kind of cases correctly. The structure of this paper is as follows: the first chapter briefly introduces the basic facts of the case, and through the analysis of the case, concludes the two controversial focus of the case. That is, whether the concentric decoration company is a legal lessee and whether it enjoys the preemptive right to purchase the house. The second chapter makes a legal analysis of the dispute focus summarized in the first chapter. First of all, through the analysis of the legal relationship between the parties involved, combined with the relevant legal provisions and legal theory, we can draw the conclusion that the concentric decoration company is the legal lessee. Secondly, it proves the rationality of the sub-lessee to enjoy the preemptive right from the value of the preemptive right system. The third chapter mainly discusses some problems that are easy to encounter in dealing with the sub-lessee 's preemptive right dispute in the judicial practice. This chapter mainly deals with the sub-lessee 's preemptive right, which is different from the lessee's preemptive right in the aspects of notification obligation, preemptive right competition and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 任泰山,何文強(qiáng);房屋租賃關(guān)系中承租人、次承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)順位探討[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年07期

2 陳英容;轉(zhuǎn)租制度之探討[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

3 鐘濤;房屋承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)若干爭(zhēng)議之解決[J];法律適用;2005年10期

4 化國(guó)宇;;次承租人的優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)問(wèn)題探析[J];發(fā)展;2010年02期

5 林姜;;次承租人優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)法律問(wèn)題之探討[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

6 劉文娟;優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)及其制度價(jià)值[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

7 吳進(jìn)強(qiáng);方健能;;房屋轉(zhuǎn)租相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題的研究[J];黑河學(xué)刊;2008年02期

8 鐘小文;淺析轉(zhuǎn)租法律問(wèn)題[J];華南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

9 黃海兵,柳春;論房屋轉(zhuǎn)租合同的效力——兼論次承租人的優(yōu)先購(gòu)買權(quán)[J];湖州職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

10 陳宏義;;默示意思表示的形式[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1781168