【摘要】："杏壇"是傳說(shuō)中孔子聚徒講學(xué)的地方。關(guān)于其"杏"字所指,目前有兩種提法,一說(shuō)為杏樹(shù),一說(shuō)為銀杏,而銀杏說(shuō)在輿論上占據(jù)主流�？贾T典籍及前人研究成果,"杏壇"原只是一個(gè)傳說(shuō),南朝后學(xué)者始將其作為文獻(xiàn)典故,并未視為歷史實(shí)存,真正的"杏壇",為宋金之時(shí)所確立,而當(dāng)時(shí)的"杏壇"之"杏"本指杏樹(shù),而非銀杏。近年來(lái)"銀杏說(shuō)"之所以愈演愈烈,除了與《孔子傳》這部人物傳記為杏壇命名賦予了銀杏象征意義,從而造成廣泛影響有關(guān)外,也與我國(guó)興起的發(fā)展銀杏經(jīng)濟(jì)、宣傳銀杏文化的浪潮密不可分。糾"銀杏"之誤傳,還"杏壇"本相,可防止繼續(xù)以訛傳訛。
[Abstract]:Xingtan is the legendary place where Confucius gathered and lectured. At present, there are two kinds of references to the word "apricot", one is apricot tree and the other is ginkgo biloba, which occupies the mainstream in public opinion. After the Southern Dynasty, scholars began to regard it as a literature and allusions, and did not regard it as a historical fact. The real "apricot altar" was established in the Song and Jin dynasties, and it was established by the Song and Jin dynasties, "Xingtan" was originally just a legend, and the "apricot altar" was established at the time of the Song and Jin dynasties. And then "apricot altar" apricot "refers to apricot tree, not ginkgo. In recent years, the reason why "Ginkgo Theory" has become more and more fierce is not only related to the symbolic meaning given to Xingtan by the biography of Confucius, which has caused extensive influence, but also to the development of ginkgo economy in our country. The wave of propagandizing ginkgo culture is inextricably linked. Correcting the misstatement of Ginkgo biloba, and also the apricot altar, can prevent the continuation of false transmission.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學(xué)岳麓書(shū)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)‘四書(shū)’學(xué)史”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):13&ZD060)系列成果之一
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I206.2;K22
，

本文編號(hào)：2472138