【摘要】：從20世紀(jì)50年代初截至目前,在諸多文學(xué)史家編著的現(xiàn)代文學(xué)史中,有關(guān)女作家蕭紅及其經(jīng)典作品的敘述呈現(xiàn)出了顯著的差異。這些差異的背后,既離不開社會政治意識形態(tài)的制約,也和文學(xué)史家所秉持的文學(xué)史觀念息息相關(guān)。因此,本論文就以建國以來編寫的諸多版本的文學(xué)史作為論述依據(jù),將蕭紅置于文學(xué)史這一宏大的視野中,對蕭紅的經(jīng)典化問題進(jìn)行了深層次的研究,探討了蕭紅經(jīng)典化的原因及生成機(jī)制。全文主體部分共三章,另附引言、結(jié)語。第一章主要整理了20世紀(jì)50年代和“重寫文學(xué)史”時(shí)期以來這兩個(gè)階段的文學(xué)史對蕭紅進(jìn)行的敘述。其中,20世紀(jì)50年代以王瑤、丁易和劉綬松編著的文學(xué)史為例,論述了這些文學(xué)史中的蕭紅及其作品的具體情況,并歸納了它們的異同之處。最后,指出了這些文學(xué)史敘述的蕭紅的局限性。“重寫文學(xué)史”時(shí)期以來的文學(xué)史著作,以楊義和錢理群的版本為例,這些文學(xué)史與王瑤等人的相比而言,擺脫了政治意識形態(tài)的束縛,因此在敘述過程中更能體現(xiàn)蕭紅創(chuàng)作獨(dú)特的藝術(shù)魅力,尤其是錢理群等人著述的《中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)三十年》這部文學(xué)史。第二章的內(nèi)容主要分析了蕭紅經(jīng)典化的外在生成機(jī)制。蕭紅的經(jīng)典化并不是一蹴而就的,它是在多重因素的綜合作用下形成的,是多種規(guī)范和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)形成共識之后才達(dá)到的一種結(jié)果。政治意識形態(tài)的制約、文學(xué)史觀念的多元變遷以及傳媒的參與和推動等因素都是十分重要的,蕭紅的經(jīng)典化過程正是在這多重因素的結(jié)合下才逐漸形成的。第三章重點(diǎn)闡述了蕭紅經(jīng)典化的內(nèi)在依據(jù)。在蕭紅經(jīng)典化的過程中,除了外在生成機(jī)制的影響和推動,蕭紅作品本身所具有的豐富的文化內(nèi)涵、精神意蘊(yùn)和獨(dú)特的藝術(shù)特色才是最為重要的因素。眾所周知,內(nèi)因是事物發(fā)展的根本原因。因此,這一部分主要從蕭紅對東北鄉(xiāng)村的獨(dú)特呈現(xiàn)、生與死的文化探求和別具一格的藝術(shù)追求這三個(gè)方面,分析了蕭紅經(jīng)典化的內(nèi)在依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:From the beginning of 1950s to the present, the narration of Xiao Hong, a female writer, and his classic works have shown remarkable differences in the modern literary history compiled by many literary historians. Behind these differences, there is not only the restriction of social political ideology, but also the concept of literary history held by literary historians. Therefore, on the basis of many versions of literary history written since the founding of the people's Republic of China, this paper puts Xiao Hong in the grand field of view of literary history, and makes a deep research on the question of the classicalization of Xiao Hong. This paper discusses the causes and formation mechanism of Xiao Hong's classicalization. The main part of the paper consists of three chapters, with an introduction and a conclusion. The first chapter mainly arranges the narration of Xiao Hong in the literary history of these two periods since the 1950s and the period of rewriting the history of literature. In the 1950s, taking the literary history edited by Wang Yao, Ding Yi and Liu Shousong as an example, this paper discusses the specific situation of the literary history and its works, and sums up their similarities and differences. Finally, the author points out the limitations of Xiao Hong in the narration of literary history. The literary history works since the period of "rewriting the history of literature" take the versions of Yang Yi and Qian Liqun as examples. These literary histories, in contrast to those of Wang Yao and others, have freed themselves from the shackles of political ideology. Therefore, Xiao Hong's unique artistic charm can be reflected in the process of narration, especially in the literary history of "30 years of Modern Chinese Literature" written by Qian Liqun and others. The second chapter mainly analyzes the external generation mechanism of Xiao Hong's classicalization. Xiao Hong's classicalization is not accomplished overnight, it is formed by the comprehensive action of multiple factors, and it is a result of the consensus formation of various norms and standards. The restriction of political ideology, the pluralistic changes of the concept of literary history and the participation and promotion of the media are all very important factors, and Xiao Hong's classical process is formed gradually under the combination of these multiple factors. The third chapter focuses on the inner basis of Xiao Hong's classicalization. In the process of Xiao Hong's classicalization, in addition to the influence and promotion of the external generating mechanism, the cultural connotation, spiritual implication and unique artistic characteristics of Xiao Hong's works are the most important factors. As we all know, the internal cause is the fundamental reason for the development of things. Therefore, this part mainly from Xiao Hong's unique presentation of the northeast countryside, life and death of the cultural exploration and unique artistic pursuit of these three aspects, analysis of the internal basis for the Classization of Xiao Hong.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：I206.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 季進(jìn);對優(yōu)美作品的發(fā)現(xiàn)與批評,永遠(yuǎn)是我的首要工作——夏志清先生訪談錄[J];當(dāng)代作家評論;2005年04期

2 鄭國慶;文學(xué)史與歷史語境——關(guān)于“民間”與“現(xiàn)代性”[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2001年01期

3 陳進(jìn)東;邊緣姿態(tài)的寫作——析蕭紅的香港時(shí)期文學(xué)創(chuàng)作[J];涪陵師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

4 溫存超;傳統(tǒng)模式的沖擊與新文體的創(chuàng)造──蕭紅小說論[J];河池師專學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);1997年03期

5 王玉屏;論蕭紅的文學(xué)觀[J];惠州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期

6 李向輝;批評的批評:蕭紅研究回顧[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

7 王春榮;;新世紀(jì)十年蕭紅研究狀況分析[J];遼寧大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

8 王吉鵬,趙欣;魯迅與中國現(xiàn)代女性文學(xué)[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年05期

9 王穎;尋找天平之舞的平衡點(diǎn)——從蕭紅、張愛玲小說創(chuàng)作的史學(xué)評價(jià)談起[J];臨沂師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

10 張海生;;1990年代以來的中國現(xiàn)代小說史編撰走向[J];蘭州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 吳雁琴;論蕭紅獨(dú)特的文學(xué)品質(zhì)[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

2 畢秀麗;論蕭紅小說對人生存狀態(tài)的探索[D];山東師范大學(xué);2011年

3 曹海娟;蕭紅小說主題意蘊(yùn)研究[D];西北大學(xué);2011年

4 王琪瑋;新時(shí)期以來蕭紅形象的重構(gòu)[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2011年

5 鄭萍萍;蕭紅創(chuàng)作的生命哲學(xué)闡釋[D];青島大學(xué);2003年

6 孔凡梅;蕭紅小說創(chuàng)作中的源與流[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

7 江少英;論蕭紅小說創(chuàng)作的“詩學(xué)”意蘊(yùn)[D];福建師范大學(xué);2006年

8 王艷;《生死場》閱讀史及其經(jīng)典地位的形成[D];中央民族大學(xué);2007年

9 顏峗梅;眷戀與反叛—蕭紅作品主題研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2009年

10 劉志剛;論蕭紅的死亡意識[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2400794