虛構(gòu)判定的幾個(gè)原則——以何大草《盲春秋》的序跋為例
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-29 05:54
【摘要】：何大草的小說《盲春秋》的序跋挑戰(zhàn)了敘述學(xué)中的虛構(gòu)判定方法,也給敘述學(xué)中的虛構(gòu)判定問題以啟示。通過對(duì)它的分析,可以總結(jié)出四條關(guān)于虛構(gòu)判定的原則:(一)體裁形式與虛構(gòu)性互為判定依據(jù);(二)聲源人物不影響敘述內(nèi)容的虛構(gòu)性判定;(三)虛構(gòu)與紀(jì)實(shí)可以交叉;(四)紀(jì)實(shí)或虛構(gòu)最終由讀者決定。
[Abstract]:The preface and postscript of he Dacao's novel "Blind Spring and Autumn" challenge the method of judging fiction in narratology and enlighten the problem of fictional judgment in narratology. By analyzing it, Four principles of fictional judgment can be summarized: (1) the form of genre and fictitious form are the basis for judging each other; (2) the character of sound source does not affect the judgment of fictitious structure of narrative content; (3) fiction and documentary can intersect; (4) documentary facts can be intersected. Or fiction is ultimately up to the reader.
【作者單位】： 四川師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I207.42
，
本文編號(hào)：2151740
[Abstract]:The preface and postscript of he Dacao's novel "Blind Spring and Autumn" challenge the method of judging fiction in narratology and enlighten the problem of fictional judgment in narratology. By analyzing it, Four principles of fictional judgment can be summarized: (1) the form of genre and fictitious form are the basis for judging each other; (2) the character of sound source does not affect the judgment of fictitious structure of narrative content; (3) fiction and documentary can intersect; (4) documentary facts can be intersected. Or fiction is ultimately up to the reader.
【作者單位】： 四川師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I207.42
，
本文編號(hào)：2151740
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyuyanwenxuelunwen/2151740.html
