【摘要】：詩歌選本的編纂活動在明清時異�；钴S�！对姳扰d箋》作為其一,長時間存在著作權爭議,直至近年才得以厘清,實為魏源所著。作為獨一一部反映魏源詩學觀念的古詩選本,《詩比興箋》多選漢、魏、唐時期為世人所公認的比興體詩,并加以箋釋。較之其他詩歌選本,選詩數(shù)量雖少,但頗具特點。本文認為《詩比興箋》“以人選詩”,尤其關注入選詩人的道德品格。此種選詩標準與魏源受公羊學“尊王”思想,重視文學創(chuàng)作者的道德修養(yǎng)及自身濃重的愛國主義思想有著莫大關聯(lián)。與所選古詩各占半壁江山的箋文,顯現(xiàn)出魏源對詩人之志的理解。其中運用了四種詩歌箋釋方法:物象類型、以史證詩、以詩釋詩及以文釋詩。在運用方法的過程中,存在一些錯誤觀點,比如以詩為史,或認為詩中物物皆有所托喻,乃至穿鑿附會等尤需注意。其后,針對魏源有意刪改古詩的行為,本文給予一定的批判。認為其行為既不能體現(xiàn)魏源之大膽的取舍氣魄,又無助于提升古詩的思想內涵及藝術美,毫不可取。產生有一個半世紀的《詩比興箋》,接受過程卻頗為曲折。其蘊含之價值主要體現(xiàn)在能夠繼承漢儒以比興為美刺的說詩傳統(tǒng),注重“以詩為諫”。缺陷與不足同樣突出,表現(xiàn)在不合理的刪改詩作、注釋的瑕疵、著書不嚴謹?shù)确矫妗４送?篇末之附錄,乃因岳麓書社版《詩比興箋》在撰寫之時及出版過程中產生了一些疏漏,附錄于此為之勘正。
[Abstract]:The compilation of poetry anthology was very active in the Ming and Qing dynasties. As one of them, the copyright dispute existed for a long time, and it was only in recent years that it was clarified by Wei Yuan. As the only anthology of ancient poetry which reflects Wei Yuan's poetic concept, "Shi Bi Xing Ji" is a popular poem of the Han, Wei and Tang dynasties, which is recognized by the world and annotated. Compared with other poetry anthology, although the number of poetry selection is small, but quite characteristic. In this paper, the author thinks that Poems by the person is especially concerned about the moral character of the selected poets. This standard of poetry selection is closely related to Wei Yuan's thought of respecting the king and attaching importance to the moral cultivation of literary creators and his own strong patriotism. The notes, which share half of the selected ancient poems, show Wei Yuan's understanding of the poet's aspirations. There are four methods of explaining poems: the types of objects, the historical poems, the poems with poems and the poems with literature. In the process of using the method, there are some wrong views, such as taking poetry as the history, or thinking that the objects in the poem are all figurative, and that even the supplementary meeting should be paid more attention to. After that, this paper criticizes Wei Yuan's behavior of deliberately expunging ancient poems. It is not desirable to think that his behavior can neither reflect Wei Yuan's bold choice nor help to promote the ideological connotation and artistic beauty of ancient poetry. For a century and a half, the process of acceptance was rather tortuous. Its value is mainly reflected in inheriting the tradition of saying poems with Bi Xing as a thorn in Han Confucianism, and paying attention to "taking poems as remonstrations". The defects and shortcomings are also prominent, such as unreasonable deletion of poetry, defects of annotation, unrigorous writing and so on. In addition, the appendix at the end of the article is due to some omissions in the writing and publishing process of Yuelu Book.
【學位授予單位】：江西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I207.22

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 唐飛鳳;黃建軍;;從《詩比興箋》看魏源的人格之美[J];邵陽學院學報(社會科學版);2016年03期

2 唐飛鳳;黃建軍;;魏源《詩比興箋》稿本與刻本之比較[J];邵陽學院學報(社會科學版);2015年05期

3 黃建軍;;論魏源《詩比興箋》的詩學闡釋范式[J];求索;2015年07期

4 王輝斌;;陳沆與樂府詩比興箋釋[J];貴州師范大學學報(社會科學版);2014年05期

5 曾鳳凰;;《詩比興箋》對《漢鐃歌句解》的繼承與批判[J];重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版);2014年09期

6 張建偉;盛寅;;《詩比興箋》陶淵明詩注評議[J];天中學刊;2014年01期

7 馬玉;;《詩比興箋》與古典詩學的近代轉型[J];淮南師范學院學報;2014年01期

8 吳懷東;馬玉;;魏源詩學思想與湖湘地域文化——以《詩古微》、《詩比興箋》為論述中心[J];安徽農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2013年01期

9 吳懷東;馬玉;;《詩比興箋》詩學思想與嘉、道之際學術思潮[J];皖西學院學報;2012年06期

10 楊明;;言志與緣情辨[J];上海師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年01期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 李程;朱彝尊《明詩綜》研究[D];華中師范大學;2014年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 翟惠;《清詩別裁集》研究[D];蘇州大學;2011年

2 陳海霞;《明詩別裁集》研究[D];江西師范大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2140088