本文選題：戴鈞衡 + 文化堅守�。� 參考：《安徽師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：桐城派作為一個散文流派,能在林林總總的文學(xué)流派中脫穎而出,傳衍不衰,綿延長達(dá)兩百年,主盟清代文壇,成為當(dāng)時最大的散文流派,這主要基于桐城派門人秉承文派宗旨,發(fā)展桐城古文,不斷提高文章與文論水準(zhǔn)等為門派傳承所作出的不懈努力。十九世紀(jì)上半葉,時局動蕩不安、戰(zhàn)亂頻繁,而此時桐城派文壇盟主的地位已然有所撼動,桐城派文人如何振興門派,挽狂瀾于既倒,扶大廈之將傾,成為他們尤為關(guān)注與思考的。本文將以桐城派文人戴鈞衡為研究主體,截取其文化活動中的重要節(jié)點(diǎn),試圖闡釋其對文化的堅守與傳承行為。文章分為四個部分。第一章主要介紹戴鈞衡所處的時代背景,分析桐城派在傳承過程中的困境。第二章重點(diǎn)介紹了方東樹與戴鈞衡之間的師生關(guān)系。第一部分從主客觀視角出發(fā),分析戴鈞衡拜方東樹為師的原因;第二部分則以戴鈞衡拜方東樹為師為界,通過比較戴鈞衡前后期詩歌集在詩歌類型、風(fēng)格、手法上的差異性,著重表現(xiàn)其師方東樹詩學(xué)專著《昭昧詹言》對戴鈞衡詩歌創(chuàng)作的影響,進(jìn)一步探尋出其在現(xiàn)實(shí)環(huán)境之下所做出的調(diào)整與適變。第三章主要從整理鄉(xiāng)邦文集入手,以戴名世為典型事例。這主要基于戴名世本人的爭議性,桐城派文人因“南山集案”對戴名世忌憚不已,而戴鈞衡竭盡所能整理其文集,這樣的行為無疑帶有一定的深層意味。后又將戴名世與戴鈞衡的古文特色進(jìn)行評點(diǎn),歸納出戴鈞衡古文的藝術(shù)特色。第四章以戴鈞衡與桐鄉(xiāng)書院為研究對象。本章先是對桐鄉(xiāng)書院的創(chuàng)辦過程進(jìn)行概述,其次主要論述戴鈞衡創(chuàng)辦桐鄉(xiāng)書院的原因,再次通過考證其為書院建設(shè)所制定的具體舉措,從而探究教育之于文化傳承的深刻意義。結(jié)語部分是對戴鈞衡拜師訪學(xué)、整理鄉(xiāng)邦文集、興學(xué)講學(xué)等文化活動的小結(jié),明晰時代低潮之下的文人心態(tài),闡釋文化活動的內(nèi)在關(guān)聯(lián),突顯其現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,從而升華主題,引出對傳統(tǒng)文化的思考,點(diǎn)明傳統(tǒng)文化與現(xiàn)實(shí)社會兩者之間存在的矛盾,進(jìn)而探究文人為實(shí)現(xiàn)文化的傳承在社會的大背景之下,如何能體現(xiàn)個人的價值,完成文化與社會的交融和對接。
[Abstract]:As a school of prose, the Tongcheng school is able to stand out in the general literary genres of Lin and Lin, and spread and evolve for up to two hundred years. The literary circle of the Qing Dynasty in the Qing Dynasty has become the largest school of prose at that time. This is mainly based on the development of the literary tenet, the development of the ancient prose of Tongcheng, and the continuous improvement of the article and the level of literary theory for the inheritance of the school. Unremitting efforts in the first half of the nineteenth Century, the current situation was turbulent and the war was frequent. At this time, the status of the Tongcheng School of liberal arts allies had been shaken, and how the Tongcheng scholars were able to rejuvenate the factions, to save the mountains and to help the edifice of the mansion, to be particularly concerned and thinking. This article will take the Tongcheng school scholar Dai Junheng as the research subject and intercept it. The important node in cultural activities tries to explain its adherence to culture and its inheritance. The article is divided into four parts. The first chapter mainly introduces the background of Dai Junheng's times and analyzes the plight of the Tongcheng school in the process of inheritance. The second chapter focuses on the relationship between the teacher and the students between Fang Dongshu and Dai Junheng. The first part is from the perspective of subjective and objective views. On the basis of the analysis of the reason for Dai Jun Heng to worship the East tree as a teacher, the second part, taking Dai Jun Heng's East tree as the division, compares the poetic types, styles and techniques of the poems of Jun Heng in the earlier period, and emphasizes the influence of his master Fang Dongshu poetic monograph on the creation of Dai Junheng's poetry. In the third chapter, the third chapter is mainly based on the collation of the village state anthology, which is based on Dai Mingshi as a typical example. This is mainly based on the controversial nature of Dai Mingshi. The Tongcheng pat literati are unscruple about Dai Ming in the case of "the case of Nanshan collection". Deep meaning. Then, then the characteristics of Dai Mingshi and Dai Junheng's ancient prose are evaluated, and the artistic features of Dai Jun Heng are summed up. The fourth chapter takes Dai Jun Heng and Tongxiang academy as the research object. This chapter first summarizes the establishment process of Tongxiang academy, secondly mainly discusses the reasons of Dai Junheng's establishment of Tongxiang academy, and again through textual research The conclusion is to explore the profound significance of education for cultural heritage. The concluding part is a summary of the cultural activities such as Dai Jun's visits, the collation of the rural state anthology, the learning of learning and other cultural activities, the clarity of the literati's mentality under the low tide of the times, the interpretation of the intrinsic relevance of cultural activities, and the significance of the cultural activities, thus the sublimation of the theme. It leads to the reflection on the traditional culture and points out the contradiction between the traditional culture and the real society, and then explores how the literati can reflect the individual value and complete the integration and docking of culture and society in order to realize the cultural heritage in the great background of the society.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I206.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉德州;;戴鈞衡之學(xué)術(shù)淵源及其《書傳補(bǔ)商》之特色[J];孔子研究;2015年06期

2 郭青林;;方東樹“詩文一理”說與其詩歌體用論[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年06期

3 李楊武;;淺讀《皖桐香山戴氏宗譜》[J];廣東技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年01期

4 張曉婧;;清代桐城桐鄉(xiāng)書院的管理特色[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期

5 石珂;;桐城末學(xué)的群體構(gòu)成與唐宋古文接受[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年06期

6 石雷;;明清詩文研究的觀念、方法和格局漫談[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);2011年03期

7 楊懷志;;曾國藩與桐城文人[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

8 胡建次;;清代詩學(xué)理論批評視野中的詩氣論[J];北方論叢;2009年02期

9 曾光光;;戴名世與桐城派關(guān)系辨析[J];安徽史學(xué);2008年05期

10 劉麗娟;周君閑;;桐城派教育心理學(xué)思想初探[J];當(dāng)代教育論壇(學(xué)科教育研究);2007年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王啟芳;晚清桐城詩派研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

2 張曉婧;清代安徽書院研究[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2014年

3 陳春華;清代書院與桐城文派的傳衍[D];蘇州大學(xué);2013年

4 陳曉紅;方東樹詩學(xué)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 王元冬;清代前期文化政策研究[D];青島大學(xué);2013年

2 占文倩;明清桐城地方宗族的祖先記憶與族譜編纂[D];江西師范大學(xué);2013年

3 佟欣;論戴名世的古文理論及創(chuàng)作[D];齊齊哈爾大學(xué);2013年

4 田豐;方東樹的學(xué)術(shù)與古文創(chuàng)作[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

5 司雯;戴鈞衡：桐城派盛衰之際的現(xiàn)實(shí)文人[D];安徽大學(xué);2010年

6 王艷輝;曾國藩與道咸同年間傳統(tǒng)文化的嬗變[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1860382