本文選題：秦觀 + 散文�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文主要通過史料的整理鉤輯,對秦觀散文的文學(xué)性做了較為合理的闡述,同時也對秦觀散文在文學(xué)史上的地位進(jìn)行了簡單的探討。秦觀身處文化繁榮、政治開明的宋朝,他的出生、仕途、閱歷、交友等影響了他的思想,使他的思想復(fù)雜紛繁。這些思想讓他能夠在得意時更加進(jìn)取,在失意時能迅速調(diào)整心態(tài),同時這些思想作用于他的文學(xué)創(chuàng)作中,也使得他的文學(xué)作品內(nèi)容豐富、思想深刻。歷代對于秦觀散文的態(tài)度和研究大概是這樣一種狀況：北宋時期,秦觀散文是深受人們的喜愛和贊賞的；南宋時期,更是大量刊刻其文,認(rèn)為秦觀散文能夠自成一家；到了元朝,他的文章逐漸被詞作所掩蓋,人們往往只關(guān)注他的詞而忽視了他的文章；明朝時期,茅坤的《唐宋八大家文鈔》的出現(xiàn),使得人們對于唐宋散文的認(rèn)識僅停留在“韓、柳、歐、蘇、王、曾”的身上,提及唐宋散文就是韓、柳、歐、蘇,連對王安石、曾鞏、蘇洵、蘇轍的關(guān)注也不夠,秦觀的散文就更不必說了。特別是袁宏道評秦文時說：“文字亦爽健,未免酸腐”。他認(rèn)為秦文雖然在文字方面比較爽朗矯健,但是內(nèi)容上卻過于酸腐,有濃烈的書生氣,不值一讀。作為當(dāng)時的文壇領(lǐng)袖,這種說法完全是對秦觀散文的一種誤解,使得當(dāng)時文人也輕視秦文,這不免使人遺憾。建國以后的文學(xué)史,對于秦觀散文也較少提及,這對讀者和研究者來說都是一種損失。好在徐培均和周易敢兩位老先生對于秦文都非常重視,他們畢其一生都在致力于秦觀散文的研究。徐培均先生編撰的《秦少游年譜長編》、《淮海集箋注》,周易敢先生編撰的《秦觀集編年校注》、《秦觀資料匯編》為研究者們提供了豐富資料的同時,也使得人們對于秦觀散文開始重視起來。其實,秦觀的散文雖然是“襲漢唐遺風(fēng)”,師法東坡,但是在文學(xué)藝術(shù)性上還是具有獨(dú)到之處的。他的文章“結(jié)構(gòu)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)、章法井然、文采絢爛、說理深刻、鋪陳排比、氣勢恢宏、比喻生動、形象豐滿、引經(jīng)據(jù)典、說理透辟”,不失為優(yōu)秀的散文。
[Abstract]:This article mainly through the historical data collation hook collection, has made the more reasonable elaboration to Qin Guan prose literariness, also has carried on the simple discussion to the Qin Guan prose in the literary history position. Qin Guan was in the prosperous and politically enlightened Song Dynasty. His birth, career, experience and making friends influenced his thoughts and complicated his thoughts. These thoughts enable him to be more enterprising when he is pleased and to adjust his mind quickly when he is frustrated. At the same time, these thoughts act on his literary creation and make his literary works rich in content and profound in thought. The attitude and research of Qin Guan prose in the past dynasties are as follows: during the Northern Song Dynasty, Qin Guan prose was deeply loved and appreciated by people; By the Yuan Dynasty, his writings were gradually covered up by ci, and people tended to focus on his words but ignored his articles. In the Ming Dynasty, Mao Kun's "eight Family Notes of Tang and Song dynasties" appeared. So that people's understanding of the prose of Tang and Song Dynasty only stays on the body of "Han, Liu, ou, Su, Wang, Zeng". It is mentioned that the prose of Tang and Song dynasties is Han, Liu, ou, Su. Even the attention to Wang Anshi, Zeng Gong, Su Xun and Su Zhi is not enough. Qin Guan's prose, let alone say. Yuan Hongdao, in particular, commented on Qin Wen: "the text is also refreshing, sour rot." He believed that Qin Wen, although relatively lively in the text, but the content is too sour, strong bookish, not worth reading. As a literary leader at that time, it was a misunderstanding of Qin Guan's prose, which made the literati despise Qin Wen, which was regrettable. The history of literature after the founding of the people's Republic of China was seldom mentioned in Qin Guan's prose, which was a loss to readers and researchers. Fortunately, Xu Peijun and Zhou Yi-dang both attached great importance to Qin Wen. They devoted their whole life to the study of Qin Guan's prose. Mr. Xu Peijun compiled "Qin Shaoyou chronological Chronicle", "Huaihai Collection Notes", "Zhou Yi Gan" Qin Guan Collection "," Qin Guan data compilation "provided researchers with abundant information at the same time. It also makes people begin to attach importance to Qin Guan prose. In fact, although Qin Guan's prose is a "legacy of Han and Tang dynasties", it is unique in literature and art. His article, "rigorous structure, well-organized, brilliant literary, profound reasoning, pretensions, grandeur, vivid metaphor, full image, citing classics, reasoning thoroughly", can be regarded as excellent prose.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：I207.62

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 吳禮丹;秦觀的人才為學(xué)觀[J];巢湖學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

2 劉紅紅;;超越與執(zhí)著——張耒與秦觀貶謫心態(tài)之比較[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年05期

3 郝赤;;關(guān)于章法技巧[J];渤海大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年06期

4 劉海清;秦觀性格論[J];中南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2000年01期

5 田泳錦;;秦觀記人散文藝術(shù)特色探析[J];小說評論;2013年S1期

6 朱德才;秦少游的“復(fù)雅歸宗”[J];文史哲;1987年01期

，

本文編號：1818901