發(fā)布時間：2018-04-22 10:20

  本文選題：順著說 + 倒著說��； 參考：《人文雜志》2017年11期

【摘要】：在民族文化復興的當代語境中,知識界確有必要深刻反思百余年來西學援引的種種后遺癥,確有必要甄別"順著說""倒著說""接著說"在文化立場、價值導向以及方法范式上的根本不同。不同于"倒著說"建立在各種西學"后見之明"的理論預設上,"順著說"是按照中國文學思想的本然脈絡和固有方法研究批評史的。兩者在文化立場、價值導向以及方式方法上有著根本的不同。
[Abstract]:In the contemporary context of the revival of national culture, it is really necessary for the intellectual circles to reflect deeply on the various sequelae cited by Western studies over the past hundred years, and to distinguish between "following the saying" and "saying the opposite" and then saying "from the cultural standpoint". There are fundamental differences in value orientation and methodological paradigm. Different from the theoretical presupposition of "inverted theory", which is based on various western studies, it is based on the original context and inherent method of Chinese literary thought to study the history of criticism. There are fundamental differences in cultural standpoint, value orientation and method between the two.
【作者單位】： 曲阜師范大學孔子文化研究院;首都師范大學文學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重點項目“儒家早期文學價值觀研究”(16AZW001)
【分類號】：I206.2
，

本文編號：1786796