本文選題：詩(shī)歌批評(píng) + 批評(píng)家　； 參考：《南方文壇》2017年06期

【摘要】：正我對(duì)漢語(yǔ)新詩(shī)的整體狀況有一個(gè)私人的判斷,即這一百年來(lái),中國(guó)并不缺少好詩(shī)人甚至大詩(shī)人,但真正足以與這種狀況相匹配的大批評(píng)家,則似乎一個(gè)也無(wú)。如今的詩(shī)歌批評(píng)家中最優(yōu)秀的幾位,固然可以稱得上勤勉稱職,卻并無(wú)足夠的機(jī)緣與能力走在更遙遠(yuǎn)的前頭,為向未來(lái)敞開(kāi)的可能性提供必要的想象,也無(wú)法撬動(dòng)業(yè)已建立的經(jīng)典格局和評(píng)判秩序,重新為漢語(yǔ)詩(shī)"立法"。即便水準(zhǔn)勉強(qiáng)相稱,他們?cè)谂c這個(gè)時(shí)代最好詩(shī)人的持續(xù)"角力"中,無(wú)論是贊賞還是譏諷,
[Abstract]:I have a personal judgment on the overall situation of Chinese new poetry, that is, there has been no shortage of good poets or even great poets in China over the past 100 years, but there seems to be none of the great critics who are really good enough to match this situation.The best of today's critics of poetry, though worthy of diligence, do not have the opportunity and ability to move further ahead of them, and to provide the necessary imagination for the possibilities open to the future.Nor can the established classical pattern and judgment order be able to re-legislate for Chinese poetry.Even if the standards were barely matched, they were, in their constant "struggle" with the best poets of their time, either appreciative or sarcastic,
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：I207.25

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙t，

本文編號(hào)：1741365